HemodynamIc eFfects of Lung Collapse and overdIstension During ARDS (HI-FIVE)

February 14, 2026 updated by: GRIECO DOMENICO LUCA, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

HemodynamIc eFfects of Lung Collapse and overdIstension in Patients With Moderate-to-seVEre Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: the HI-FIVE Physiologic Study

The management ARDS relies on ventilatory strategies aimed at limiting ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The setting of PEEP is still subject of debate, as randomized clinical trials comparing standardized higher versus lower PEEP strategies failed to demonstrate a clear survival advantage. Only few studies explored the hemodynamic effects of various PEEP levels depending on lung recruitability. Furthermore, the role of PEEP-mediated lung collapse and overdistention on patients' hemodynamics has yet to be elucidated. In this physiologic study, the association between EIT-measured lung collapse and overdistention and cardiac function will be explored, accounting for the individual potential for lung recruitment, partitioned respiratory mechanics and cardiac preload responsiveness. Three PEEP levels will be tested in a randomized, crossover fashion: PEEP corresponding to the crossing point between lung collapse and overdistention, PEEP associated with low lung collapse, PEEP associated with low lung overdistention.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Rome
      • Rome, Rome, Italy, 00168
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Filippo Bongiovanni, MD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Massimo Antonelli, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tommaso Rosà, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Antonio Maria Dell'Anna, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Simone Carelli, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • acute respiratory failure with onset < 1 week from a predisposing risk factor, such as pneumonia, non-pulmonary infection, trauma, transfusion, aspiration, or shock;
  • bilateral opacities on chest radiography and computed tomography or bilateral B lines and/or consolidations on lung ultrasound not fully explained by effusions, atelectasis, or nodules/masses;
  • pulmonary edema not exclusively or primarily attributable to cardiogenic pulmonary edema/fluid overload, and hypoxemia/gas exchange abnormalities not primarily attributable to atelectasis;
  • PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 200 during invasive controlled mechanical ventilation;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <18 years;
  • pregnancy;
  • signs of barotrauma or documented pneumothorax;
  • severe tachycardia (HR > 120 bpm) and severe lacticaemia (lac > 4 mmol/L)
  • pre-existing decompensated heart failure (NYHA class 3-4 and/or documented left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%);
  • contraindications to EIT placing (open chest wounds, presence of cardiac pacemaker);
  • intubation as a result of an acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disease;
  • contraindications to esophageal balloon placement (high bleeding risk, esophageal varices).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lung collapse and overdistention crossing point PEEP
Patients will undergo a decremental PEEP trial to determine the crossing-point PEEP. Secondly, three PEEP levels (low collapse PEEP, low overdistention PEEP and crossing point between lung collapse and overdistention PEEP) will be compared in a randomized order with 30-minute steps
Experimental: Low lung collapse PEEP
Patients will undergo a decremental PEEP trial to determine the crossing-point PEEP. Secondly, three PEEP levels (low collapse PEEP, low overdistention PEEP and crossing point between lung collapse and overdistention PEEP) will be compared in a randomized order with 30-minute steps
Experimental: Low lung overdistention PEEP
Patients will undergo a decremental PEEP trial to determine the crossing-point PEEP. Secondly, three PEEP levels (low collapse PEEP, low overdistention PEEP and crossing point between lung collapse and overdistention PEEP) will be compared in a randomized order with 30-minute steps

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of lung collapse on cardiac output
Time Frame: Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Evaluation of the relative contribution of lung collapse (arbitrary units) on patients' cardiac output at different PEEP levels (L/min)
Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Impact of lung collapse on pulmonary vascular resistance
Time Frame: Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Evaluation of the relative contribution of lung collapse (arbitrary units) on pulmonary vascular resistance (dyn·s/cm^5) at different PEEP levels
Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Impact of lung overdistention on cardiac output
Time Frame: Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Evaluation of the relative contribution of lung overdistention (arbitrary units) on patients' cardiac output at different PEEP levels (L/min)
Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Impact of lung overdistention on pulmonary vascular resistance
Time Frame: Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Evaluation of the relative contribution of lung overdistention (arbitrary units) on pulmonary vascular resistance (dyn·s/cm^5) at different PEEP levels
Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between potential for lung recruitment and PEEP-induced changes in cardiac output
Time Frame: Assessment at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
The effects of PEEP on cardiac output (mL/min) will be correlated through Pearson correlations with the individual potential for lung recruitment, as determined by the recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I)
Assessment at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Correlation between potential for lung recruitment and PEEP-induced changes in pulmonary vascular resistance
Time Frame: Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
The effects of PEEP on pulmonary vascular resistance (dyn·s/cm^5) will be correlated through Pearson correlations with the individual potential for lung recruitment, as determined by the recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I)
Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
PEEP-induced effects on cardiac output in cardiac preload responsive vs. nonresponsive patients
Time Frame: Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
The effects of PEEP on cardiac output (L/min) will be compared through subgroup comparisons (student t-test) in patients who are preload responsive and patients who are not (preload responsiveness assessed through pulse-pressure variation, expressed in %)
Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
PEEP-induced effects on pulmonary vascular resistance in cardiac preload responsive vs. nonresponsive patients
Time Frame: Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
The effects of PEEP on pulmonary vascular resistance (dyn·s/cm^5) will be compared through subgroup comparisons (student t-test) in patients who are preload responsive and patients who are not (preload resposnsiveness assessed through pulse-pressure variation, expressed in %)
Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Relationship between transpulmonary pressures and central venous pressure variations
Time Frame: At the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
The relationship between transpulmonary pressure variations (cmH2O) and central venous pressure variations (cmH2O) between PEEP levels will be assessed through Pearson correlations
At the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Lung hysteresis
Time Frame: At the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Lung hysteresis will be assessed at each of the tested PEEP levels and expressed as the area of the pressure-volume loop of the respiratory system obtained with a low-flow inflation/deflation maneuver from PEEP to a pressure of 30 cmH2O, in mL*cmH2O
At the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Lung aeration distribution
Time Frame: At the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Lung aeration distribution at each PEEP level tested will be assessed with electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and expressed as dorsal fraction of ventilation (% of total tidal volume)
At the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Relationship between PEEP-induced changes in lung volume and PEEP-induced changes in pulmonary vascular resistance
Time Frame: Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
The effects of PEEP on pulmonary vascular resistance (dyn·s/cm^5) will be correlated through Pearson correlations with the individual PEEP-induced changes in lung volume (mL)
Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
Relationship between PEEP-induced changes in lung volume and PEEP-induced changes in cardiac output
Time Frame: Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps
The effects of PEEP cardiac output (L/min) will be correlated through Pearson correlations with the individual PEEP-induced changes in lung volume (mL)
Assesment performed at the end of each of the three 30 minute steps

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Domenico Luca Grieco, MD, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ARDS

Clinical Trials on Change in PEEP

Subscribe