Adaptive Gamification in Obstetric Nursing

April 17, 2026 updated by: Sergio Mies Padilla, Servicio Canario de Salud

Effectiveness of Gamification With a Narrative Adapted to the Player's Profile in Obstetric Nursing Competencies: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial Protocol

This pilot study, conducted at the University of Atlántico Medio, seeks to transform the training of future nurses through a "Precision Education" model, moving away from generic simulations to focus on learning adapted to the student's individual profile. Through a clinical trial with 38 second-year students, the research evaluates whether using Artificial Intelligence to personalize educational narratives (gamification) according to the student's personality enhances academic performance in obstetrics (pregnancy and childbirth). The ultimate goal is to demonstrate that adapting teaching to each student's psychological characteristics is not only a sustainable strategy but also produces better-prepared professionals with higher knowledge retention, directly translating into safer and higher-quality care for patients and their families.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Imagine if education were like a suit: currently, most classes are "one-size-fits-all." All students receive the same lesson in the same way, regardless of whether they are shy, bold, analytical, or emotional. But what if the investigator could tailor a suit specifically for each student's mind?

A new pilot study from the University of Atlántico Medio has set out to answer this question, exploring how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can revolutionize the way the investigators train our future healthcare professionals.

The Problem: The investigators don't All Learn the Same Way Nursing training, especially in critical areas like obstetrics (pregnancy and childbirth care), requires not only technical skill but also rapid decision-making and empathy. Traditional simulation methods often overlook the student's "personal profile," offering a generic experience that doesn't motivate everyone equally.

The Solution: Custom Stories Generated by AI have designed an innovative protocol combining psychology and technology. Instead of a standard class, the study uses educational games (gamification).

The big breakthrough is the use of Artificial Intelligence. The AI analyzes each student's personality and adapts the game's narrative to their profile.

Is the student competitive? The game might present high-stakes challenges.

Are they more reflective? The story might offer deep data for analysis.

To test if this works, a trial is being conducted with 38 second-year nursing students. They will be divided into two groups:

Those learning with the traditional (generic) game method.

Those learning with the "Precision Education" method, where AI adapts clinical pregnancy and childbirth cases to their personality.

The goal is to measure not only how much they learn ("learning gain") but also how much they enjoy and engage in the process.

Why Does This Matter for Everyone? This study isn't just about improving student grades. It is about safety and excellence in healthcare.

If the investigators demonstrate that adapting education to a student's personality creates better-prepared and more committed nurses, the investigators will be opening the door to more humane and effective healthcare. Furthermore, the use of Generative AI makes this personalization-previously impossible due to cost-a sustainable and accessible tool for medical and nursing schools.

The investigators are witnessing the shift from mass education to person-centered education, ensuring that those who care for us tomorrow have the best possible preparation today.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Las Palmas
      • Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain, 35213
        • Universidad del Atlántico Medio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Students of the bachelor's degree in nursing
  • Enrolled in the course "Reproductive Health Nursing and Sex Education
  • Active enrollment
  • Face-to-face attendance
  • Technological access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students repeating the course
  • Students with prior specialized training
  • Students with uncorrected sensory impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adapted Gamified
Participants in this arm attend four 120-minute face-to-face simulation sessions where the gamified narrative is personalized based on their profile from the Player Personality and Dynamics Scale (PPDS): Tryhard, Coacher, Esthetic, Joker, or Toxic. While maintaining identical clinical objectives and difficulty to the control group, the intervention features AI-generated adaptations in four key dimensions: 1) Narrative Tone (e.g., "Epic/Heroic" for Tryhards, "Humorous" for Jokers); 2) Visual Aesthetics (e.g., "High-fantasy/Dark" for Esthetics); 3) Feedback Style (e.g., motivational challenges vs. empathetic support); and 4) Side Missions (e.g., hidden Easter eggs or speed puzzles). Participants access these specific narrative variations via differentiated login codes corresponding to their assigned personality profile.
The Experimental Group receives a personalized experience generated by AI and adjusted to five personality profiles (PPDS scale). This adaptation transforms the learning "wrapper" by offering specific narrative tones (such as heroic, humorous, or empathetic), differentiated visual aesthetics, feedback styles adjusted to the student's motivation, and exclusive side missions (such as puzzles or speed challenges), which are accessed via specific codes according to their role.
Active Comparator: Generic Gamified
Participants in this arm attend four 120-minute face-to-face simulation sessions managed via the Wix platform. The intervention utilizes a standardized, linear narrative script generated by AI but curated to maintain a neutral, academic tone. The visual aesthetics of the digital learning environment are uniform, adhering to standard medical imagery (clean, white/blue interface). Feedback provided upon completing clinical challenges (Google Forms) is strictly informational (Correct/Incorrect plus standard explanation). No specific side missions or profile-based adaptations are included. All participants access the platform using a single, uniform login credential.
The primary distinction between the two groups lies exclusively in the adaptation of the narrative and gamification elements, given that the clinical content, learning objectives, and difficulty remain invariant to ensure academic validity. The Control Group interacts with a linear and generic narrative characterized by a neutral academic tone, standard medical aesthetics, and conventional feedback without additional missions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Learning Gain
Time Frame: On day 1 of the intervention and in the end of treatment every session
The main outcome variable will be academic performance, LG, understood to reflect new knowledge acquired on the subject under study. The degree of assimilation of the theoretical and practical concepts of pregnancy and childbirth in each of the four clinical cases will be evaluated. To this aim, an "ad hoc" questionnaire comprising 40 multi-ple-choice questions was designed by the PI, who is a certified Nurse Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynecology (Midwife) and the lecturer in charge of the class. The items were constructed to strictly align with the specific curricular contents and learning ob-jectives of the 'Reproductive Health' syllabus. To ensure external content validity prior to administration, this initial draft will be reviewed by an external panel of five experts (three academic midwives and two obstetricians). Regarding reliability, since this is a pilot study, internal consistency and item analysis will be calculated post hoc to validate the instrument for future trials.
On day 1 of the intervention and in the end of treatment every session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction with the gamification
Time Frame: At the end of treatment, at 4 weeks
The students' subjective perception of the usefulness, fun, and moti-vation generated by the activity will be evaluated using the Gameful Experience Scale (GAMEX). This validated 27-item instrument in Spanish is suitable for measuring game experience in nursing students' training. It uses Likert-type re-sponses to measure the multidimensional nature of the gamified experience in the educational context. The six dimensions include enjoyment, abstraction, creative thinking, activation, absence of negative effects, and mastery. This model demonstrated high overall reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.85. The scoring format uses a five-point Likert scale. In the proposed study, measurement will be con-ducted exclusively at the end of the intervention (Session 4) to capture the students' overall perception of the program. Prior to analysis, items with negative wording (reverse punctuation) will be recoded so that higher scores consistently reflect a more positive.
At the end of treatment, at 4 weeks
Sociodemographic variables
Time Frame: On day 1 of the intervention
Age is understood as the time that a person has lived, counting from birth to the time of the survey, measured in whole years; sex is understood as a variable that refers to the social and cultural construction that defines the roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes that a society considers appropriate, with the answer options male, female, and non-binary; and the average grade considered to mean the average grade achieved in the first year of the nursing program to monitor the differences between the groups.
On day 1 of the intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Player Profile
Time Frame: On day 1 of the intervention
The students' psychological and behavioral predisposition to game dynamics and narratives will be assessed using the PPDS in its validated Spanish version. The PPDS is a psychometrically validated instrument composed of 21 items rated on a six-point Likert scale specifically designed to identify player pro-files in the context of educational gamification based on narratives to measure the frequency of certain behaviors, where 1 means "Never" and 6 means "Always". After a student completes the questionnaire, the system does place them in a single cat-egory but generates five independent scores, one for each profile, showing which of the following profiles they align with the most: Tryhard (achievement- and com-petency-oriented); Coacher (oriented toward leadership and help); Esthetic (narra-tive and visual beauty-oriented); Joker (oriented to humor and surprise); or Toxic (a technical gamification term referring to players oriented toward testing system limits, seeking loopholes).
On day 1 of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Learning Development

Clinical Trials on Adapted Gamified

Subscribe