- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07434336
Adaptive Gamification in Obstetric Nursing
Effectiveness of Gamification With a Narrative Adapted to the Player's Profile in Obstetric Nursing Competencies: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial Protocol
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Imagine if education were like a suit: currently, most classes are "one-size-fits-all." All students receive the same lesson in the same way, regardless of whether they are shy, bold, analytical, or emotional. But what if the investigator could tailor a suit specifically for each student's mind?
A new pilot study from the University of Atlántico Medio has set out to answer this question, exploring how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can revolutionize the way the investigators train our future healthcare professionals.
The Problem: The investigators don't All Learn the Same Way Nursing training, especially in critical areas like obstetrics (pregnancy and childbirth care), requires not only technical skill but also rapid decision-making and empathy. Traditional simulation methods often overlook the student's "personal profile," offering a generic experience that doesn't motivate everyone equally.
The Solution: Custom Stories Generated by AI have designed an innovative protocol combining psychology and technology. Instead of a standard class, the study uses educational games (gamification).
The big breakthrough is the use of Artificial Intelligence. The AI analyzes each student's personality and adapts the game's narrative to their profile.
Is the student competitive? The game might present high-stakes challenges.
Are they more reflective? The story might offer deep data for analysis.
To test if this works, a trial is being conducted with 38 second-year nursing students. They will be divided into two groups:
Those learning with the traditional (generic) game method.
Those learning with the "Precision Education" method, where AI adapts clinical pregnancy and childbirth cases to their personality.
The goal is to measure not only how much they learn ("learning gain") but also how much they enjoy and engage in the process.
Why Does This Matter for Everyone? This study isn't just about improving student grades. It is about safety and excellence in healthcare.
If the investigators demonstrate that adapting education to a student's personality creates better-prepared and more committed nurses, the investigators will be opening the door to more humane and effective healthcare. Furthermore, the use of Generative AI makes this personalization-previously impossible due to cost-a sustainable and accessible tool for medical and nursing schools.
The investigators are witnessing the shift from mass education to person-centered education, ensuring that those who care for us tomorrow have the best possible preparation today.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Las Palmas
-
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain, 35213
- Universidad del Atlántico Medio
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Students of the bachelor's degree in nursing
- Enrolled in the course "Reproductive Health Nursing and Sex Education
- Active enrollment
- Face-to-face attendance
- Technological access
Exclusion Criteria:
- Students repeating the course
- Students with prior specialized training
- Students with uncorrected sensory impairment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Adapted Gamified
Participants in this arm attend four 120-minute face-to-face simulation sessions where the gamified narrative is personalized based on their profile from the Player Personality and Dynamics Scale (PPDS): Tryhard, Coacher, Esthetic, Joker, or Toxic.
While maintaining identical clinical objectives and difficulty to the control group, the intervention features AI-generated adaptations in four key dimensions: 1) Narrative Tone (e.g., "Epic/Heroic" for Tryhards, "Humorous" for Jokers); 2) Visual Aesthetics (e.g., "High-fantasy/Dark" for Esthetics); 3) Feedback Style (e.g., motivational challenges vs. empathetic support); and 4) Side Missions (e.g., hidden Easter eggs or speed puzzles).
Participants access these specific narrative variations via differentiated login codes corresponding to their assigned personality profile.
|
The Experimental Group receives a personalized experience generated by AI and adjusted to five personality profiles (PPDS scale).
This adaptation transforms the learning "wrapper" by offering specific narrative tones (such as heroic, humorous, or empathetic), differentiated visual aesthetics, feedback styles adjusted to the student's motivation, and exclusive side missions (such as puzzles or speed challenges), which are accessed via specific codes according to their role.
|
|
Active Comparator: Generic Gamified
Participants in this arm attend four 120-minute face-to-face simulation sessions managed via the Wix platform.
The intervention utilizes a standardized, linear narrative script generated by AI but curated to maintain a neutral, academic tone.
The visual aesthetics of the digital learning environment are uniform, adhering to standard medical imagery (clean, white/blue interface).
Feedback provided upon completing clinical challenges (Google Forms) is strictly informational (Correct/Incorrect plus standard explanation).
No specific side missions or profile-based adaptations are included.
All participants access the platform using a single, uniform login credential.
|
The primary distinction between the two groups lies exclusively in the adaptation of the narrative and gamification elements, given that the clinical content, learning objectives, and difficulty remain invariant to ensure academic validity.
The Control Group interacts with a linear and generic narrative characterized by a neutral academic tone, standard medical aesthetics, and conventional feedback without additional missions
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Learning Gain
Time Frame: On day 1 of the intervention and in the end of treatment every session
|
The main outcome variable will be academic performance, LG, understood to reflect new knowledge acquired on the subject under study.
The degree of assimilation of the theoretical and practical concepts of pregnancy and childbirth in each of the four clinical cases will be evaluated.
To this aim, an "ad hoc" questionnaire comprising 40 multi-ple-choice questions was designed by the PI, who is a certified Nurse Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynecology (Midwife) and the lecturer in charge of the class.
The items were constructed to strictly align with the specific curricular contents and learning ob-jectives of the 'Reproductive Health' syllabus.
To ensure external content validity prior to administration, this initial draft will be reviewed by an external panel of five experts (three academic midwives and two obstetricians).
Regarding reliability, since this is a pilot study, internal consistency and item analysis will be calculated post hoc to validate the instrument for future trials.
|
On day 1 of the intervention and in the end of treatment every session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with the gamification
Time Frame: At the end of treatment, at 4 weeks
|
The students' subjective perception of the usefulness, fun, and moti-vation generated by the activity will be evaluated using the Gameful Experience Scale (GAMEX).
This validated 27-item instrument in Spanish is suitable for measuring game experience in nursing students' training.
It uses Likert-type re-sponses to measure the multidimensional nature of the gamified experience in the educational context.
The six dimensions include enjoyment, abstraction, creative thinking, activation, absence of negative effects, and mastery.
This model demonstrated high overall reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.85.
The scoring format uses a five-point Likert scale.
In the proposed study, measurement will be con-ducted exclusively at the end of the intervention (Session 4) to capture the students' overall perception of the program.
Prior to analysis, items with negative wording (reverse punctuation) will be recoded so that higher scores consistently reflect a more positive.
|
At the end of treatment, at 4 weeks
|
|
Sociodemographic variables
Time Frame: On day 1 of the intervention
|
Age is understood as the time that a person has lived, counting from birth to the time of the survey, measured in whole years; sex is understood as a variable that refers to the social and cultural construction that defines the roles, behaviors, activities, and attributes that a society considers appropriate, with the answer options male, female, and non-binary; and the average grade considered to mean the average grade achieved in the first year of the nursing program to monitor the differences between the groups.
|
On day 1 of the intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Player Profile
Time Frame: On day 1 of the intervention
|
The students' psychological and behavioral predisposition to game dynamics and narratives will be assessed using the PPDS in its validated Spanish version.
The PPDS is a psychometrically validated instrument composed of 21 items rated on a six-point Likert scale specifically designed to identify player pro-files in the context of educational gamification based on narratives to measure the frequency of certain behaviors, where 1 means "Never" and 6 means "Always".
After a student completes the questionnaire, the system does place them in a single cat-egory but generates five independent scores, one for each profile, showing which of the following profiles they align with the most: Tryhard (achievement- and com-petency-oriented); Coacher (oriented toward leadership and help); Esthetic (narra-tive and visual beauty-oriented); Joker (oriented to humor and surprise); or Toxic (a technical gamification term referring to players oriented toward testing system limits, seeking loopholes).
|
On day 1 of the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- CI/05-022
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Learning Development
-
Mahidol UniversityUnknownLearning Development
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedMotor Learning | Training Effectiveness | Motor Skills DevelopmentTurkey
-
Uppsala UniversitySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesCompletedQuality of Life | School Attendance | Learning DevelopmentSweden
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkDanish Child Cancer FoundationTerminatedEducation | Interprofessional Education | Continuing Professional Development | Case-based LearningDenmark
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedChild Development | Learning Problem | Animal-Human BondingUnited States
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalCompleted
-
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger...Johns Hopkins UniversityCompletedChild Development | Developmental Delay | Infant Development | Language DevelopmentUnited States
-
Brightlobe LimitedRecruitingNeurodevelopmental Disorders | Autism Spectrum Disorder | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Dyslexia | Child Development | Specific Learning DisorderUnited Kingdom
-
Massachusetts General HospitalTerminatedAutism Spectrum Disorder | Autism | Nonverbal Learning DisabilityUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalDemarest Lloyd Jr. FoundationCompletedAutism Spectrum Disorder | Autism | Non-verbal Learning DisorderUnited States
Clinical Trials on Adapted Gamified
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Completed
-
Idaho State UniversityNot yet recruitingExperimental Video Games | Behavioral Assessment
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaCompletedOverweight AdolescentsUnited States
-
Lokman Hekim UniversityCompletedHealth Education | Adolescent Health | Gamification | Menstrual Hygiene | Genital Hygiene BehaviorsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Lokman Hekim UniversityCompletedBreastfeedingTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of Texas at AustinCompleted
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityNot yet recruitingNursing Education | Intramuscular Injection | Metaverse
-
Lokman Hekim UniversityCompletedGamification | Family Planning | Students | Reproductive HealthTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Baskent UniversityRecruitingNursing Education | Gamification | Patient Safety | Mixed Method Implementation StudyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Northeast Normal UniversityCompleted