Postural Control Among Children with and Without Dyslexia

September 12, 2024 updated by: National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

The Influence of Visual Information on Postural Control Among Children with and Without Dyslexia

As Chinese-speaking children with dyslexia typically have different cerebellar sign behavior from non-Chinese-speaking counterparts, this study compared the effect of visual occlusion on the static balance between dyslexic and non-dyslexic children using the Chinese language.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan
        • National Chen Kong University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants will be 80 Chinese-speaking children between 8 and 12 years of age recruited from elementary schools in Taiwan. Half of the participants will be formally identified as dyslexia by specialists in the field of special education (Table 1), based on formal psycho-educational assessments (Chinese Character Recognition Test (Huang, 2001), Chinese reading diagnostic evaluation, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 4th Edition-Chinese version.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1.Normal IQ(>85, WISC-III)
  • 2.Children with dyslexia assessed by standard tools, performed by psychological-teachers of special education

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1.Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder(ADHD)
  • 2.Neurological or psychiatric abnormalities
  • 3.Developmental coordination disorder(DCD)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Children with dyslexia
The participants were instructed to perform six 60-second trials (2 conditions × 3 trials) of maintaining an upright stance on a force plate (Kistler Type 9260A, Switzerland) under the eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions. The order of EO and EC was alternated for each participant, and half of the subjects began with the EO (or EC) condition. For both conditions, the participants stood with their feet 1 cm apart on a force plate and their arms relaxed comfortably at their sides.
Non-dyslexic children
The participants were instructed to perform six 60-second trials (2 conditions × 3 trials) of maintaining an upright stance on a force plate (Kistler Type 9260A, Switzerland) under the eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions. The order of EO and EC was alternated for each participant, and half of the subjects began with the EO (or EC) condition. For both conditions, the participants stood with their feet 1 cm apart on a force plate and their arms relaxed comfortably at their sides.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postural sway analysis
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Root mean squared sway amplitude and sample entropy along the AP and ML axes
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stabilogram diffusion analysis of central of pressure
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Trajectories of central of pressure will be analyzed with stabilogram diffusion analysis to reveal behavior mechanisms for practice-related variations in feedback and feedforward process for error corrections
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Development Disorder

Clinical Trials on Eye-opened and Eye-closed

Subscribe