Catheter Ablation Versus Anti-arrhythmic Drugs for Premature Ventricular Complexes (CAAD-PVC)

February 24, 2026 updated by: Saurabh Kumar, Western Sydney Local Health District

Catheter Ablation Versus Anti-arrhythmic Drugs for Premature Ventricular Complexes (CAAD-PVC): A Randomised Controlled Trial Pilot Study

Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are extra, abnormal heart beats arising from the ventricles of the heart and are the most common ventricular arrhythmia. PVCs can be treated with medication or with a procedure called catheter ablation. It is not known which provides a better cure or provides better quality of life. The purpose of this research project is to study the best way to treat PVCs by comparing the use of medication to catheter ablation to assess which approach is better at reducing symptoms and improving quality of life.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Premature ventricular complex burden of at least 10%, as determined by multiday (>24-hour) heart rhythm monitoring
  • Normal left ventricular ejection fraction
  • Aged ≥18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent or comply with study requirements including study investigations and follow-up, medical adherence, completion of intervention.
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding.
  • Life expectancy ≤ 12 months.
  • Ventricular tachycardia (VT) that is inducible lasting 10 seconds or more; spontaneously occurring lasting 30 seconds or more or not hemodynamically tolerated); or 10 or more episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (defined as more than five sequential beats, lasting no more than 10 seconds) in 24 hours during ambulatory heart rhythm recording.
  • Structural heart disease including clinically significant coronary artery, valvular disease or clinically significant myocardial replacement.
  • Known cardiac channelopathies (e.g. Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), long- or short QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome).
  • Responsible primary care or other responsible physician believes it is not appropriate to participate in the study or unable to complete the study procedures, e.g. concomitant illness, physical impairment or mental condition which could interfere with the conduct of the study including outcome assessments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Catheter ablation

Catheter ablation (CA) will be performed within 6 weeks of randomisation, following standard practices approved by international guidelines. Medication for PVCs may be halted one week or five half-lives prior to CA. Procedures will be performed under conscious sedation or general anesthesia. Vascular access will be obtained from the femoral vein and or artery and electrode catheters to the coronary sinus, right ventricle and/or the left ventricle (by transseptal puncture or retrograde aortic approach).

Ablation will be guided by a combination of standard mapping techniques, as per standard practice. Preference will be given to "activation mapping" of the PVCs (which may be stimulated by administration of intravenous isoprenaline) using a three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. If there is paucity of PVCs, then "pace-mapping" will be performed.

End point of ablation will be abolition of all PVCs (with and without isoprenaline provocation) with a 30-minute waiting period.

Catheter ablation (CA) of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) will be performed in standard fashion as approved by international guidelines. CA aims to deliver therapeutic energy to the site of origin of the PVCs, rendering the tissue there incapable of causing the arrhythmia. Ablations will be performed under sedation or GA, guided by electroanatomic mapping and cardiac imaging. End point of CA will be abolition of all PVCs (with and without isoprenaline provocation) with a 30-minute waiting period.

Occasionally, patients may experience episodes of PVC quiescence and an absence of PVCs on the day of CA. This can be a result of changes in medication, stress, hormones, electrolytes and can be unpredictable. As at least one PVC occurring during the CA is required to perform a CA, an episode of PVC quiescence on the day of the procedure that inhibits the ablation from taking place will not preclude the patient from having a repeat attempt at the CA.

Active Comparator: Medical therapy: Anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) and/or beta-adrenergic blocking agents (BB)

Medical therapy: Anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) and/or beta-adrenergic blocking agents (BB).

Patients randomised to the control arm will be managed with medical therapy alone by their usual medical practitioners. The objective of this arm is that it replicates what would constitute standard of care for patients with PVCs managed with a non-interventional approach.

Standard clinical care would usually encompass patients who have symptoms and have not previously been prescribed an AAD or BB, being commenced on an AAD and/or a BB. Choice of AAD/BB will be left to primary physician however if this is deferred to the trial team, clinical protocol would suggest sotalol 80mg twice daily - a commonly medication that has both AAD and BB properties. A lower dose may be initiated by the treating physician, as clinically indicated.

If sotalol is contraindicated, an alternative BB may be initiated using standard doses e.g. metoprolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, carvedilol.

This arm aims to replicate standard of care for patients with PVCs managed by a non-interventional approach, usually encompassing patients who have symptoms and have not previously been prescribed an AAD or BB, being commenced on an AAD and/or a BB. Choice of AAD/BB will be left to primary physician: If deferred to the trial team, clinical protocol suggests sotalol (which has both AAD and BB properties) 80mg twice daily, or a lower dose if indicated. If sotalol is contraindicated, an alternative BB may be initiated using standard doses (metoprolol, atenolol, bisoprolol). Clinicians may consider alternative AAD if BBs are contraindicated. For example, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (verapamil or diltiazem) may be initiated if patient has concurrent asthma. If coronary artery disease and structural heart disease is ruled out, flecainide (class I anti-arrhythmic agent) may be used. As with clinical practice, AAD/BB can be changed at any time depending on clinical response.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in premature ventricular complex burden
Time Frame: Comparison of premature ventricular complex burden at enrolment to premature ventricular complex burden 3 months post commencement of treatment
Change in premature ventricular complex burden as measured by multiday heart rhythm monitoring at median 3 months.
Comparison of premature ventricular complex burden at enrolment to premature ventricular complex burden 3 months post commencement of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Premature ventricular complex burden as measured by ≥24-hour heart rhythm monitoring heart at median 6 months.
Time Frame: Comparison of premature ventricular complexes burden at enrolment to premature ventricular complex burden at a median of 6 months post commencement of treatment
Overall premature ventricular complex burden as measured by ≥24-hour heart rhythm monitoring heart at median 6 months.
Comparison of premature ventricular complexes burden at enrolment to premature ventricular complex burden at a median of 6 months post commencement of treatment
Left ventricular function
Time Frame: Prior to or at enrollment and again at 6 months post commencement of treatment
Effect of treatment on left ventricular function, (including left ventricular ejection fraction percentage and global longitudinal strain), as assessed by changes in transthoracic echocardiography at baseline and 6 months.
Prior to or at enrollment and again at 6 months post commencement of treatment
Quality of Life score as measured by the Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA)
Time Frame: Quality of Life questionnaire completed at enrolment and again at 6 months post commencement of treatment
Quality of Life score as measured by questionnaire Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA)
Quality of Life questionnaire completed at enrolment and again at 6 months post commencement of treatment
Quality of Life score as measured by the 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) questionnaire
Time Frame: Quality of Life questionnaire completed at enrolment and again at 6 months post commencement of treatment
Quality of Life score as measured by the 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) questionnaire
Quality of Life questionnaire completed at enrolment and again at 6 months post commencement of treatment
Quality of Life score as measured by The Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillator Concerns (ICDC) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Quality of Life questionnaire completed at enrolment and again at 6 months post commencement of treatment
Quality of Life score as measured by The Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillator Concerns (ICDC) Questionnaire
Quality of Life questionnaire completed at enrolment and again at 6 months post commencement of treatment
Quality of Life score as measured by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale -21 Items (DASS-21) questionnaire
Time Frame: Quality of Life questionnaire completed at enrolment and again at 6 months post commencement of treatment
Quality of Life score as measured by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale -21 Items (DASS-21) questionnaire
Quality of Life questionnaire completed at enrolment and again at 6 months post commencement of treatment
Number of patients with ≥75%, ≥90%, ≥95% reduction in burden
Time Frame: Heart rhythm monitoring performed prior to/at enrollment and again at 3 months, with repeat multi-day heart rhythm monitoring at 6 and 12 months encouraged but not mandated
Number of patients with ≥75%, ≥90%, ≥95% reduction in burden as assessed on multi-day heart rhythm monitoring compared to pre-enrollment multi-day heart rhythm monitoring
Heart rhythm monitoring performed prior to/at enrollment and again at 3 months, with repeat multi-day heart rhythm monitoring at 6 and 12 months encouraged but not mandated
Adverse Events - Medical Therapy Arm
Time Frame: Assessed over the 6 months following commencement of treatment post randomization
Assessment and description of adverse events associated with the prescribed medical therapy
Assessed over the 6 months following commencement of treatment post randomization
Adverse Events - Catheter Ablation Arm
Time Frame: Assessed over the 6 months following commencement of treatment post randomization
Assessment and description of adverse events associated with the catheter ablation procedure
Assessed over the 6 months following commencement of treatment post randomization
Health service utilization
Time Frame: From commencement of treatment until 12 months post treatment
Incidence of cardiovascular hospital admissions or consultations occurring for each patient
From commencement of treatment until 12 months post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Saurabh Kumar, MBBS, PhD, Western Sydney Local Health District

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC)

Clinical Trials on Catheter ablation

Subscribe