Emergency Stroke Unit With NeuAngio-CT (ESU-ACT)

March 4, 2026 updated by: Yongjun Wang, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Effect of Emergency Stroke Unit With NeuAngio-CT Direct for Acute Ischemic Stroke and Suspected Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusion (ESU-ACT)

Rationale: Acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion (LVO) requires rapid recanalization to minimize neurological damage, as shorter onset-to-reperfusion times are strongly associated with better clinical outcomes. Conventional management workflows, which involve separate non-contrast CT or multimodal imaging assessments prior to transfer to the angiography suite, often introduce significant delays. The implementation of a "one-stop" management model using a hybrid sliding-gantry CT/DSA suite allows for immediate diagnosis and subsequent intervention in a single clinical environment, potentially streamlining the transition to treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of the one-stop hybrid suite workflow compared to standard imaging-first management in improving functional outcomes for patients with suspected LVO presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset.

Methods and Design: This study is a prospective, multicenter, matched cluster, open-label, blinded endpoint non-randomized cohort. It includes patients aged ≥18 years with a RACE score ≥4, a pre-stroke mRS score ≤1, and suspected intracranial LVO within 6 hours of onset. Hospitals in the exposure group utilize an Emergency Stroke Unit equipped with a sliding NeuAngio-CT/DSA hybrid suite, while control hospitals follow the conventional imaging workflow.

Study Outcomes: The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving functional independence at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. The primary safety outcome is the proportion of patients with all-cause mortality at 7 days or at the time of hospital discharge.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

This study employs a multicenter, matched-cluster controlled design wherein 5 to 10 hospitals equipped with Neusoft Medical's domestic sliding-gantry Angio-CT/Digital Subtraction Angiography (ACT/DSA) system, and staffed by personnel who have completed standardized operational training, will be selected as the Exposure Group, while a corresponding 5 to 10 matched hospitals lacking this integrated system will serve as the Control Group. In the Exposure Group, the protocol dictates an optimized direct-to-angiography suite workflow; upon arrival, patients undergo immediate neurological evaluation utilizing the Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) scale and stat laboratory testing before being transferred directly to the angio suite. Intra-suite imaging is then acquired via the sliding-gantry system to perform non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and CT angiography (CTA). If a large vessel occlusion (LVO) is confirmed-specifically involving the M1/M2, P1, A1, or basilar artery (BA) segments-endovascular therapy (EVT), encompassing mechanical thrombectomy, balloon angioplasty, and/or stenting, is initiated immediately on the same table. For patients without an identified LVO, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is administered in situ if clinical eligibility is met. Conversely, patients in the Control Group will adhere to standard-of-care diagnostic pathways, undergoing initial cross-sectional neuroimaging (NCCT/CTA or MRI/MRA) in a conventional Radiology Department, where IVT is administered in accordance with current guidelines; if an LVO is radiologically confirmed during this standard workflow, patients are subsequently transferred to a separate angiography suite to undergo EVT.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

It includes patients aged ≥18 years with a RACE score ≥4, a pre-stroke mRS score ≤1, and suspected intracranial LVO within 6 hours of onset. Hospitals in the exposure group utilize an Emergency Stroke Unit equipped with a sliding NeuAngio-CT/DSA hybrid suite, while control hospitals follow the conventional imaging workflow.

Description

  • Inclusion Criteria:

    1. Age ≥ 18 years;
    2. Clinically diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke;
    3. RACE score ≥ 4 points upon hospital arrival;
    4. Time from symptom onset/last known normal to hospital arrival ≤ 6 hours;
    5. Pre-stroke mRS score 0-1;
    6. Informed consent signed by the patient or their legal representative.
  • Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Hemorrhagic stroke diagnosed by cranial CT or MRI during this current episode;
    2. Uncontrolled hypertension with medication (defined as systolic blood pressure > 185 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 110 mmHg) (Note: Patients may be included if blood pressure can be successfully reduced and maintained at an acceptable level with medication);
    3. Known hereditary or acquired bleeding tendency, such as coagulation factor deficiency, or INR > 3.0 or PT > 3 times the normal range after anticoagulant therapy (Patients without a history of coagulation dysfunction or suspected coagulation dysfunction do not need to wait for laboratory results of INR or prothrombin time before enrollment);
    4. Received heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (e.g., dalteparin sodium), or thrombin inhibitors (e.g., bivalirudin, argatroban) within 24 hours with a history of coagulation disorders;
    5. Baseline laboratory values: blood glucose < 50 mg/dl (2.78 mmol/L) or > 400 mg/dl (22.20 mmol/L), hemoglobin count < 7 mmol/l (11.28 g/dl); platelet count < 50,000/μl;
    6. Patients with renal failure, defined as serum creatinine > 3.0 mg/dl (264 μmol/l) (Note: Patients undergoing dialysis can be included regardless of serum creatinine level);
    7. Cerebral embolism caused by septic emboli or bacterial endocarditis;
    8. History of stroke within the past 3 months;
    9. Seizure at stroke onset leading to diagnostic confusion and difficulty in accurate baseline RACE assessment;
    10. History of previous neuropsychiatric disorders that make accurate neurological function assessment difficult, such as dementia patients taking cholinesterase inhibitors;
    11. Diagnosis of cerebral vasculitis, brain tumor, or traumatic brain injury within the past 3 months;
    12. Major organ surgery or biopsy within 30 days;
    13. Active bleeding or recent bleeding within 30 days;
    14. History of previous intracranial stent implantation;
    15. History of severe contrast agent allergy (non-rash allergy);
    16. Patients with other contraindications to reperfusion therapy or who refuse reperfusion therapy;
    17. Life expectancy less than 180 days;
    18. Lactating women or women with positive pregnancy test on admission;
    19. Patients who refuse or cannot cooperate with follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Exposure: one-stop workflow with hybrid sliding NeuAngio-CT/DSA system
After patients arrive at the emergency room, they undergo neurological function assessments (RACE) and routine laboratory tests; eligible patients are then treated according to the one-stop workflow with hybrid sliding NeuAngio-CT/DSA system.
Control: conventional workflow with CT and DSA
After patients arrive at the emergency room, they undergo neurological function assessments (RACE, NIHSS, mRS scores) and routine laboratory tests; eligible patients are then treated according to the conventional workflow with CT and DSA.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with mRS score 0-2 at 90 days
Time Frame: at 90 days
Scores on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) range from 0 (no neurologic deficit) to 6 (death).
at 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with mRS score 0-3 at 90 days
Time Frame: at 90 days
Scores on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) range from 0 (no neurologic deficit) to 6 (death).
at 90 days
Ordinal (shift) analysis of mRS at 90 days
Time Frame: at 90 days
Scores on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) range from 0 (no neurologic deficit) to 6 (death).
at 90 days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: From date of enrollment until the date of discharge, assessed up to 3 months
From date of enrollment until the date of discharge, assessed up to 3 months
Hospitalization cost
Time Frame: From date of enrollment until the date of discharge, assessed up to 3 months
From date of enrollment until the date of discharge, assessed up to 3 months
Incidence of neurological deterioration within 24 hours after enrollment
Time Frame: within 24 hours after enrollment
within 24 hours after enrollment
Incidence of neurological deterioration at 7 days/discharge;
Time Frame: at 7 days/discharge
neurological deterioration is defined as an increase in NIHSS score of ≥4 points from baseline. Scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more severe neurological impairment and worse clinical outcomes.
at 7 days/discharge
Proportion of patients with "early efficacy (NIHSS score decrease ≥10 points, or NIHSS score 0-1)" at 7 days of hospitalization/discharge
Time Frame: at 7 days or at discharge
Scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more severe neurological impairment and worse clinical outcomes.
at 7 days or at discharge
Change in infarct volume at 24 hours (±3 hours) (median difference), assessed by central laboratory using MR T2/Flair or CT (evaluated in patients who received endovascular therapy)
Time Frame: at 24 hours (±3 hours)
at 24 hours (±3 hours)
Proportion of patients with mTICI > 2b (evaluated in patients who received endovascular therapy)
Time Frame: immediately after the intervention
immediately after the intervention
Median DPT time measurement (door-to-arterial puncture time) (evaluated in patients who received endovascular therapy)
Time Frame: door-to-arterial puncture time,recorded immediately after the intervention
door-to-arterial puncture time,recorded immediately after the intervention
Median DRT time measurement (door-to-reperfusion time) (evaluated in patients who received endovascular therapy)
Time Frame: door-to-reperfusion time,recorded immediately after the intervention
door-to-reperfusion time,recorded immediately after the intervention
Median DNT time measurement (door-to-needle time) (evaluated in patients who received IVT)
Time Frame: door-to-needle time,recorded immediately after the intervention
door-to-needle time,recorded immediately after the intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality at 7 days or at discharge
Time Frame: at 7 days or at discharge
at 7 days or at discharge
90-day all-cause mortality
Time Frame: at 90-day
at 90-day
90-day stroke-related mortality
Time Frame: at 90-day
at 90-day
Rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), evaluated according to ECASS III and Heidelberg criteria
Time Frame: at 90-day
at 90-day
Rate of serious procedural complications
Time Frame: 24 hours after endovascular therapy

Serious procedural complications including:

  • Vessel perforation
  • Arterial dissection
  • Access site complications
  • Intraprocedural death
  • Other procedure-related complications adjudicated by the Safety Committee
24 hours after endovascular therapy
Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame: at 90-day
at 90-day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zeguang Ren, Dr., Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Ischemic Stroke

Subscribe