Facilitating Autism Diagnosis in Shorter Timeframes by PCCs (FAST-ASD)

March 4, 2026 updated by: Carol Weitzman, Boston Children's Hospital

Impact and Effectiveness of Training Primary Care Clinicians to Diagnose Autism in Children 18-36 Months by Primary Care Clinicians: A Multisite Study

This study is looking at time to diagnostic resolution for children ages 18-36 months with concern of ASD. The main purpose of this research study is to see if the time between when a child aged 18-36 months fails an autism screen or a clinician raises concern and is evaluated is shorter in the primary care practices where the clinicians have been trained to conduct diagnostic evaluations. The training includes use of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale-2, which is validated for use in children 2 and older. The investigators also want to learn more about whether primary care clinicians can accurately evaluate and diagnose young children ages 18-36 months of age with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will conduct a multisite hybrid 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized clinical trial to determine if training Primary Care Clinicians (PCCs) to diagnose autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in young children is an effective strategy for decreasing time from a result indicative of increased likelihood of autism, as determined from a visit in primary care, to diagnostic resolution defined as either making or excluding a diagnosis of autism. The investigators will also assess diagnostic concordance between PCCs and autism experts and facilitators and barriers to implementation of this model. Through pediatric clinics, the investigators will be training primary care clinicians (PCCs) to diagnose ASD as part of an established training program, and will assess their diagnostic accuracy by prospectively enrolling patients at the time of their referral for a confirmatory evaluation by a DBP and comparing their CARS scores and certainty ratings. PCCs will be surveyed about their experiences and feedback about training.

There are 3 cohorts of participants in this study:

Group 1 are primary care clinicians, and will be consented into the study and asked to perform the following activities: complete ASD diagnostic training, either in the immediate intervention or delayed intervention group; continue conducting ASD screening per standard of care; refer patients requiring diagnostic confirmation to one of the study sites, including evaluation on diagnostic accuracy.

Group 2 are staff at a primary care practice where one or more clinician are taking part in the training. They will be given the option to participate in surveys and/or focus groups asking about the impact of this autism assessment training on their practices and workflows.

Group 3 are the parents/legally authorized representatives of patients (age 18-36 months) with a flagged result on an autism screener, distributed per standard of care by their pediatrician/PCC's office. They will be contacted by study staff and verbally consented into the study. They will be asked to complete monthly telephone surveys, for up to 8 months. A subset (referred to as Group 3B) will be referred by their PCCs for confirmatory evaluation at one of the clinical study sites. They will be asked to provide written consent for sharing of their evaluation and relevant information from their medical record.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria is at the practice level:

  • Are physicians or nurse practitioners.

    -- Currently screen children for ASD at 18 and 24 months using a standard measure

  • Willing to have practice randomized and willing to defer PCC training if they are randomized to the control group.

    • Will obtain permission from parents of children 18-36 months with a positive autism screen or clinician concern for research staff to contact them
    • Will attend all training courses, complete all requirements of training, and complete questionnaires that are designed to assess the educational intervention.
    • Will keep a record of all diagnostic evaluations they complete over the study period including those children not referred for diagnostic concordance evaluation if they are randomized to the intervention group

Exclusion Criteria:

- Are not screening children for ASD and standard intervals of 18 and 24 months using a standard meaure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Immediate training in Autism Diagnostic Evaluations
Practices in this group will include Primary Care Clinicians who receive immediate training in a 6-session educational program designed to teach them to diagnose autism in children 18-36 months who are at high risk for ASD.
The intervention is being trained in a 6-session curriculum designed to teach primary care clinicians to conduct autism diagnostic evaluations.
No Intervention: Deferred Training; control Group
Practices in this group will include Primary Care Clinicians who will deferred training receive similar training to the PCCs in the intervention group after data collection is complete.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ASD Screen to Diagnostic Resolution
Time Frame: From time of study enrollment after a positive ASD screen or clinician concern to diagnostic resolution or 8 months have elapsed.
Mean time to diagnostic resolution between intervention and control sites. Time to diagnostic resolution is defined as the time from the first positive screen for autism in the practice or clinician concern raised until an evaluation is completed in which the child is either diagnosed with autism or the evaluation concludes that the child does not have autism.
From time of study enrollment after a positive ASD screen or clinician concern to diagnostic resolution or 8 months have elapsed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Concordance
Time Frame: At time of evaluations by the Developmental Behavioral Pediatrician within 3 months after the Primary Care Clinician has completed a diagnostic evaluation
Agreement between Primary Care Clinician evaluation versus Developmental Behavioral Pediatrician evaluation (diagnostic concordance) on the CARS-2 (Childhood Autism Rating Scale- 2nd Edition, Standard Version), a 15 item well recognized measure used to help identify and assess the severity of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children. Clinician Confidence in Diagnostic Assessment will be rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1= Not at all sure of diagnostic conclusion to 5=Highly certain of diagnostic conclusion.
At time of evaluations by the Developmental Behavioral Pediatrician within 3 months after the Primary Care Clinician has completed a diagnostic evaluation
Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Primary Care Diagnostic Evaluations for Autism
Time Frame: After subject enrollment is completed until month 31 of the study
Descriptive statistical (means, SD or median, IQR for non-parametric data) summaries of responses to the Acceptability of Intervention Measure ( 4 item measure with scale of 1-5 with higher scores indicating endorsement of acceptability)
After subject enrollment is completed until month 31 of the study
Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Primary Care Diagnostic Evaluations for Autism
Time Frame: After subject enrollment is completed until month 31 of the study
Descriptive statistical (means, SD or median, IQR for non-parametric data) summaries of responses to the Intervention Appropriateness Measure ( 4 item measure with scale of 1-5 with higher scores indicating endorsement of intervention appropriateness)
After subject enrollment is completed until month 31 of the study
Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Primary Care Diagnostic Evaluations for Autism
Time Frame: After subject recruitment is complete until month 31 of the study
Descriptive statistical (means, SD or median, IQR for non-parametric data) summaries of responses to the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (4 item measure with scale of 1-5, with higher scores indicating endorsement of feasibility)
After subject recruitment is complete until month 31 of the study
Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Primary Care Diagnostic Evaluations for Autism
Time Frame: After subject enrollment is completed until month 31 of the study
Qualitative analysis of interviews of selected key informants including of PCCs, nurses, practice administrators and parents of children who were evaluated by PCCs in the primary care practice.
After subject enrollment is completed until month 31 of the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

This will be discussed with Autism Research Consortium Steering Committee

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Educational training to conduct ASD diagnostic evaluations

Subscribe