Central Sensitization and Clinical Parameters in Chronic Neck Pain

March 4, 2026 updated by: Süreyya DAMAR ÖRENLER, Turkoglu Dr. Kemal Beyazit State Hospital

Correlation of Central Sensitization With Pain, Pain Catastrophizing, Disability, Sleep Quality, and Jaw Function in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study

This study is a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study that assesses the correlations among central sensitization, pain, psychosocial factors, and temporomandibular function in patients with chronic neck pain. It underscores the importance of the biopsychosocial model in clinical practice and aims to improve understanding of central mechanisms in treatment planning. treatment planning.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic neck pain is a widespread health issue globally that negatively impacts quality of life. In some patients, pain cannot be explained solely by tissue damage; increased sensitivity of the central nervous system (central sensitization) may contribute to the persistence of pain.

The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between the level of central sensitization and the following parameters in individuals with chronic neck pain:

  • Pain intensity
  • Pressure pain threshold
  • Pain catastrophizing level
  • Neck-related disability
  • Sleep quality
  • Jaw function

The study has a retrospective, cross-sectional design. Records of patients previously evaluated in the clinic will be analyzed. No new interventions will be conducted on participants. The study is observational in nature.

This research aims to:

  • Enhance understanding of the clinical significance of central sensitization in chronic neck pain
  • Contribute to the development of multidisciplinary treatment strategies
  • Support the management of patients through more personalized treatment plans.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kahramanmaraş, Turkey (Türkiye), 46000
        • Türkoğlu Dr. Kemal Beyazıt State Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population includes patients living in Kahramanmaraş who have chronic neck pain. The sample consists of these patients who visited our clinic with this issue, received a diagnosis of chronic neck pain from a specialist, and agreed to take part in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients aged 18-60 years

Patients with neck pain lasting at least 3 months.

Patients with a pain intensity of 4 or higher on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Patients with a Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) score greater than 30.

Patients with a Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) score greater than 30.

Patients who have not received physiotherapy or manual therapy in the past 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Individuals with a history of neck or spinal surgery.

Patients with a history of whiplash injury or fracture.

Individuals with unstable neurological findings.

Presence of cervical pathology such as herniation or nerve root compression.

Regular use of analgesic or anti-inflammatory medications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)
Time Frame: At baseline (single time-point assessment)
Central sensitization was assessed using the CSI, a tool applicable in cases of chronic pain. The CSI has two parts. Part A evaluates symptoms and is scored from 0 to 100; higher scores reflect greater central sensitization. A score of 30 or higher suggests the presence of central sensitization. Part B asks if the individual has ever been diagnosed with any central sensitization syndromes.
At baseline (single time-point assessment)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: At baseline
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is commonly employed in clinical practice because it is simple to use and consistent. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where "0" indicates no pain and "10" signifies the worst possible pain. Patients are informed that pain severity increases from 0 to 10 and are asked to mark the number that best reflects their pain level.
At baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: At baseline (single time-point assessment)
Pain catastrophizing was measured with the PCS. This 13-item self-report questionnaire includes three subscales: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Higher scores indicate more pain and greater functional impairment, with a total score above 30 signifying a clinically significant level of pain catastrophizing.
At baseline (single time-point assessment)
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: At baseline (single time-point assessment)

Participants' neck disability levels were evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

The scale includes 10 items that address neck pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, driving, sleep, and recreational activities.

Each item is scored from 0 to 5. The total score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater disability.

Disability levels are classified as follows:

0-4: No disability

5-14: Mild disability

15-24: Moderate disability

25-34: Severe disability

35 and above: Complete disability

At baseline (single time-point assessment)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: At baseline (single time-point assessment)

Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI was created by Buysse et al. in 1989. The scale's validity and reliability in Turkish were tested by Agargün et al. in 1996.

The questionnaire features 24 items related to both nighttime and daytime sleep. Nineteen items are self-rated, while five are answered by a bed partner or roommate. The five partner-rated items and the question asking whether the person has a sleep partner or roommate are not included in the scoring.

Responses are rated on a 0-3 scale:

0 = Not during the past month

  1. = Less than once a week
  2. = Once or twice a week
  3. = Three or more times a week

Eighteen of the 24 items are scored, resulting in a total score from 0 to 21. A score of 5 or below indicates good sleep quality, while a score above 5 suggests poor sleep quality.

At baseline (single time-point assessment)
Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20)
Time Frame: At baseline

The Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 (JFLS-20) will be used to assess the level of temporomandibular joint function in individuals. The JFLS-20 is a questionnaire designed to measure disability in people with temporomandibular disorders.

Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no limitation and 10 indicates severe limitation. The total score ranges from 0 to 200, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. The JFLS-20 is a valid and reliable tool for clinical use.

At baseline
Assessment of Pressure Pain Threshold
Time Frame: At baseline
Pressure pain sensitivity will be assessed using a digital pressure pain threshold (PPT) algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA). Measurements will be taken bilaterally from the upper trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, masseter, and temporalis muscles.
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Aysenur TUNCER, PT,PhD, Independent researcher

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • No publications yet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data from this study will be available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. The shared data will include anonymized clinical and questionnaire results used in this study.

Requests can be directed to the corresponding author, Dr. Süreyya Damar-Örenler (email: fztsureyya88@otmail.com). Data sharing will adhere to applicable ethical and privacy regulations.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Start Date: 2026-06-01

End Date: 2031-06-01

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared with researchers who submit a reasonable request describing the planned analyses and agree to use the data for research purposes only. A data use agreement may be required.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Subscribe