PCSK9 Inhibitor for Intracranial Atherosclerosis Related Acute Ischemic Stroke (PISTIAS-3)

July 14, 2026 updated by: Wei-Hai Xu, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

PCSK9 Inhibitor for Intracranial Atherosclerosis Related Acute Ischemic Stroke (PISTIAS-3): a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

This study is a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate whether early administration of PCSK9 inhibitors can effectively improve functional outcomes at 90 days in patients with ischemic stroke (AIS) associated with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), primarily assessed using the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Although intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapies have significantly improved reperfusion success rates, three critical challenges persist in clinical practice that determine prognosis: First, only a limited proportion of patients can actually receive reperfusion therapy within the therapeutic time window; Second, even with successful reperfusion, secondary injuries such as microcirculatory perfusion failure, inflammatory cascades, and thrombus reformation may still occur. Third, acute phase fluctuations, particularly early neurological deterioration and the risk of early recurrence, remain prominent, directly limiting improvements in functional outcomes. 3 Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) accounts for up to 50% of ischemic stroke etiologies in China. Its pathological chain-"plaque instability-thrombosis-microcirculatory impairment"-permeates both the acute and subacute phases, closely correlating with early recurrence and poor outcomes.Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) classically promotes the degradation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) receptors and elevates LDL-C levels, thereby driving atherosclerosis progression. More importantly, growing basic and translational research suggests that PCSK9 may not only function as a "lipid metabolism protein" but also participate in processes such as endothelial activation, inflammatory cascades, platelet reactivity, and microcirculatory dysfunction. This positions it as a potential hub connecting the "plaque-thrombus-inflammation" axis. Consequently, PCSK9 inhibitors may offer additional neurovascular protective benefits beyond lipid-lowering effects during the acute phase of acute ischemic stroke (AIS).Existing basic and clinical evidence suggests that PCSK9 inhibitors may exert a combined intervention effect on key pathological processes driving atherosclerosis during the acute phase of AIS through a dual mechanism involving both lipid-dependent and non-lipid-dependent pathways. Mechanistic studies reveal that PCSK9 inhibition simultaneously modulates inflammatory responses, endothelial activation, dysfunction, and thrombogenic tendencies. In ischemia-reperfusion models, it demonstrates neuroprotective signaling by mitigating brain injury and improving neurological function. Clinically, large randomized trials confirm its ability to rapidly enhance lipid-lowering effects beyond statins and reduce ischemic stroke risk. Further translational evidence in cerebrovascular disease indicates that in symptomatic ICAS populations, PCSK9 inhibitor plus statin-enhanced lipid-lowering therapy reduces plaque burden, alleviates stenosis, and increases plaque stability. In the acute phase of AIS, early addition of PCSK9 inhibitors correlates with reduced neurological deterioration within 7 days, decreased recurrence risk within 30 days, and improved functional outcomes at 90 days. Collectively, this evidence chain spanning mechanisms to clinical practice provides clear scientific rationale and clinical necessity for adding PCSK9 inhibitors to the treatment of ICAS-associated AIS.This study is a nationwide, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. It will enroll 1,212 patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups using a randomized allocation method: (1) Experimental group: 450 mg of Recaticimab for Injection (3 vials) administered as a single subcutaneous injection. (2) Control group: Placebo of Recaticimab for Injection 450 mg (3 vials) administered as a single subcutaneous injection. Each group will include 606 patients. Both groups will receive standard guideline-recommended treatment in addition to the study drug. Long-term efficacy was assessed through patient visits and evaluations at 0 hours, 24 hours (±2 or ±12 hours), 7 days (±2 days) or at discharge, 90 days (±7 days), and 1 year.Primary outcome measures included: Analysis based on the intention-to-treat principle using an ANCOVA model for all randomized patients with baseline HRMRI and a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcome measures included: (1) mRS score of 0-1 at 90 days (indicating good patient function); (2) Distribution of 90-day mRS scores; (3) Any stroke (including ischemic and hemorrhagic) within 90 days; (4) Ischemic stroke within 90 days; (5) Composite vascular events (including stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death) within 90 days; (6) 90-day European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) score; (7) 90-day Barthel Index (BI) score.Details are provided in the "Outcome Measures" section.The sample size is calculated based on the primary outcome and a total of 1212 participants are anticipated. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board will oversee the overall conduct of the trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1212

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Weihai Xu, MD
  • Phone Number: 86+13938912070
  • Email: xuwh@pumch.cn

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Beijing 100730
        • Contact:
          • Weihai Xu, MD
          • Phone Number: 86+13651147766
          • Email: xuwh@pumch.cn
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Weihai Xu, MD
      • Chongqing, China
        • Chongqing General Hospital
      • Shanghai, China
        • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100853
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shiwen Wu, MD
    • Guangdong
      • Meizhou, Guangdong, China
        • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Yuedong Hospital
    • Hebei
      • Cangzhou, Hebei, China
        • Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
      • Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China
        • Peking University Third Hospital Qinhuangdao Hospital
      • Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China, 050051
        • Hebei Provincial People's Hospital
      • Tangshan, Hebei, China, 063000
        • Tangshan Worker's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Baoquan Lu, MD
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
    • Hubei
      • Shiyan, Hubei, China
        • Affiliated Taihe Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China
        • Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
    • Inner Mongolia
      • Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China, 014000
        • Baotou Central Hospital
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210000
        • Nanjing First Hospital
    • Shandong
      • Jining, Shandong, China, 272000
        • Jining First People's Hospital
      • Liaocheng, Shandong, China, 252000
        • Liaocheng People's Hospital
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
      • Weifang, Shandong, China, 261000
        • Weifang People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Age 30 to 80 years, inclusive.
  2. Acute ischemic stroke with symptom onset within 72 hours before screening, diagnosed on the basis of neurological deficits and CT or MRI findings.
  3. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 4 to 25 at hospital admission.
  4. CTA, DSA, or MRA evidence that the culprit intracranial artery has atherosclerotic stenosis of 50% to 99%.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Intracranial arterial stenosis attributable to a nonatherosclerotic cause, such as arterial dissection, moyamoya disease, or systemic vasculitis.
  2. Any definite source of cardioembolism, such as atrial fibrillation, a mechanical prosthetic heart valve, left ventricular thrombus, or patent foramen ovale.
  3. Clinical and imaging findings suggesting that the index ischemic event is primarily attributable to cerebral small vessel disease.
  4. Pre-stroke disability, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 2 or higher before the index ischemic event.
  5. Extensive cerebral infarction on CT or MRI, such as an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) below 6 or an infarct volume of 70 mL or greater.
  6. Previous stent implantation in the culprit vessel or planned stent implantation in the culprit vessel within 3 months after enrollment.
  7. Any intracranial hemorrhage within 3 months before enrollment.
  8. An intracranial tumor; or a cerebral aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation judged to require interventional treatment.
  9. Severe active bleeding tendency or coagulation disorder.
  10. Severe cardiac, hepatic, renal, or other major organ dysfunction.
  11. Treatment with a PCSK9 monoclonal antibody inhibitor within 1 month before enrollment or with a PCSK9-targeting small interfering RNA therapy within 6 months before enrollment.
  12. A definite contraindication to statin therapy or a history of statin intolerance.
  13. Pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  14. Current participation in another clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Recaticimab plus standard therapy group
Recaticimab in combination with standard therapy
Recaticimab (450 mg single dose, subcutaneous injection) combined with standard therapy recommended by the AHA/ASA Guidelines for Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke 2026 and the Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke 2023.
Placebo Comparator: Recaticimab's placebo in combination with standard therapy group
Recaticimab's placebo in combination with standard therapy
The placebo and investigational ricaximab were identical in appearance, packaging, labeling, administration method, and dosing frequency, managed through a unified production and coding system. Standard treatment followed the recommendations outlined in the "AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke 2026" and the "Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke 2023."

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants with functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2, at Day 90
Time Frame: Day 90 (±7 days) after randomization
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a 7-category ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death), with lower scores indicating better functional status. This outcome is the proportion of participants with an mRS score of 0-2, representing functional independence. Participants who die before the Day 90 assessment will be assigned an mRS score of 6. The assessment will be performed by trained assessors blinded to treatment allocation.
Day 90 (±7 days) after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants with an excellent functional outcome, defined as an mRS score of 0-1, at Day 90
Time Frame: Day 90 (±7 days) after randomization
The mRS ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death), with lower scores indicating better functional status. This outcome is the proportion of participants with an mRS score of 0-1, representing an excellent functional outcome. Participants who die before the assessment will be assigned an mRS score of 6.
Day 90 (±7 days) after randomization
Distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at Day 90
Time Frame: Day 90 (±7 days) after randomization
The ordinal distribution of mRS scores across all seven categories will be assessed. The mRS ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death), with lower scores indicating better functional status. The outcome will evaluate a shift toward better functional outcomes across the full mRS distribution.
Day 90 (±7 days) after randomization
Incidence of any stroke through Day 90
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 90
Proportion of participants who experience an adjudicated stroke after randomization, including either ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke. Suspected events will be reviewed by an independent Clinical Event Committee blinded to treatment allocation.
From randomization through Day 90
Incidence of ischemic stroke through Day 90
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 90
Proportion of participants who experience an adjudicated ischemic stroke after randomization. Ischemic stroke is defined as a new focal neurological injury attributable to cerebral ischemia, supported by clinical findings and/or imaging evidence of acute cerebral infarction, and not explained by a nonischemic cause. Events will be adjudicated by an independent blinded Clinical Event Committee.
From randomization through Day 90
Incidence of composite vascular events through Day 90
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 90
Proportion of participants who experience at least one component of the composite endpoint after randomization. The composite endpoint includes any stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. Events will be adjudicated by an independent Clinical Event Committee blinded to treatment allocation.
From randomization through Day 90
Barthel Index score at Day 90
Time Frame: Day 90 (±7 days) after randomization
Activities of daily living will be assessed using the Barthel Index. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater independence in activities of daily living and better functional status.
Day 90 (±7 days) after randomization
Health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L at Day 90
Time Frame: Day 90 (±7 days) after randomization
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument. The descriptive system assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, with five levels of severity for each dimension. Overall self-rated health will also be assessed using the EQ visual analogue scale, ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Day 90 (±7 days) after randomization
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at Day 7 or hospital discharge
Time Frame: Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Neurological impairment will be assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The NIHSS ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurological impairment.
Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Change from baseline in NIHSS score at Day 7 or hospital discharge
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Change in NIHSS score will be calculated as the follow-up NIHSS score minus the baseline NIHSS score. The NIHSS ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurological impairment. A negative change indicates neurological improvement, whereas a positive change indicates neurological worsening.
From baseline to Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Proportion of participants achieving an LDL-C level below 1.4 mmol/L at Day 7 or hospital discharge
Time Frame: Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Proportion of participants whose measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration is below 1.4 mmol/L at the scheduled assessment.
Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Proportion of participants achieving an LDL-C level below 1.8 mmol/L at Day 7 or hospital discharge
Time Frame: Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Proportion of participants whose measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration is below 1.8 mmol/L at the scheduled assessment.
Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Change from baseline in LDL-C level at Day 7 or hospital discharge
Time Frame: From baseline to Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Change in LDL-C concentration will be calculated as the follow-up LDL-C value minus the baseline value and reported in mmol/L. A negative value indicates a reduction in LDL-C from baseline.
From baseline to Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in NIHSS score at 24 hours
Time Frame: From baseline to 24 hours after randomization, with an allowable assessment window of -2 to +12 hours
Change in NIHSS score will be calculated as the 24-hour NIHSS score minus the baseline NIHSS score. The NIHSS ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurological impairment. A negative change indicates neurological improvement.
From baseline to 24 hours after randomization, with an allowable assessment window of -2 to +12 hours
Cerebral infarct volume at Day 7 or hospital discharge
Time Frame: Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Cerebral infarct volume will be quantified in milliliters using follow-up CT or MRI and assessed by a blinded core imaging laboratory. Lower infarct volumes indicate less extensive ischemic brain injury.
Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Cerebral perfusion parameters at Day 7 or hospital discharge
Time Frame: Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Prespecified quantitative cerebral perfusion parameters derived from CT perfusion or MR perfusion imaging will be assessed by a blinded core imaging laboratory.
Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Serum interleukin-6 concentration at Day 7 or hospital discharge
Time Frame: Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Serum interleukin-6 concentration will be measured as a marker of systemic inflammation. Higher concentrations indicate greater inflammatory activity. Testing will be performed according to the prespecified laboratory procedures.
Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentration at Day 7 or hospital discharge
Time Frame: Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentration will be measured as a marker of systemic inflammation. Higher concentrations indicate greater inflammatory activity.
Day 7 (±2 days) after randomization or at hospital discharge, whichever occurs first
Incidence of any stroke through 1 year
Time Frame: From randomization through 1 year
Proportion of participants who experience an adjudicated ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke after randomization. Events will be reviewed by an independent Clinical Event Committee blinded to treatment allocation.
From randomization through 1 year
Incidence of ischemic stroke through 1 year
Time Frame: From randomization through 1 year
Proportion of participants who experience an adjudicated ischemic stroke after randomization. Events will be reviewed by an independent Clinical Event Committee blinded to treatment allocation.
From randomization through 1 year
Incidence of composite vascular events through 1 year
Time Frame: From randomization through 1 year
Proportion of participants who experience at least one component of the composite endpoint, defined as any stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. Events will be adjudicated by an independent blinded Clinical Event Committee.
From randomization through 1 year
Health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L at 1 year
Time Frame: At 1 year after randomization
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system, covering mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Overall self-rated health will also be assessed using the EQ visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived health.
At 1 year after randomization
Barthel Index score at 1 year
Time Frame: At 1 year after randomization
Activities of daily living will be assessed using the Barthel Index. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater independence and better functional status.
At 1 year after randomization
Incidence of moderate-to-severe symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 72 hours
Time Frame: From randomization through 72 hours after randomization
Proportion of participants with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage according to the modified Heidelberg criteria. The event must include imaging-confirmed intracranial hemorrhage, an increase of at least 4 points in the total NIHSS score compared with baseline or a previously recorded NIHSS score, and neurological deterioration that cannot be explained by a cause other than the intracranial hemorrhage. Qualifying hemorrhage types include parenchymal hematoma type 1 or 2, remote intracranial hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, or subdural hemorrhage.
From randomization through 72 hours after randomization
All-cause mortality through Day 90
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 90
Proportion of participants who die from any cause after randomization and through Day 90. Death will be recorded as an mRS score of 6.
From randomization through Day 90
Incidence of adverse events through Day 90
Time Frame: From administration of the study intervention through Day 90 after randomization
Proportion of participants who experience at least one adverse event after administration of the study intervention. Adverse events will be recorded with respect to onset, duration, severity, relationship to the study intervention, action taken, and outcome, and will be coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities.
From administration of the study intervention through Day 90 after randomization
Incidence of serious adverse events through Day 90
Time Frame: From administration of the study intervention through Day 90 after randomization
Proportion of participants who experience at least one serious adverse event. A serious adverse event is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability, causes a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or is considered an important medical event requiring intervention to prevent a serious outcome.
From administration of the study intervention through Day 90 after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe