Neuromodulation-Induced Cortical Prehabilitation in High Grade Glioma Near the Motor Pathway: Cortical Plasticity Assessed by Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nTMS)

March 11, 2026 updated by: Pier Paolo Berti, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige

Neuromodulation-Induced-Cortical-Prehabilitation In High Grade Glioma Close To The Motor Pathway: Analysis Of The Cortical Brain Plasticity Through Navigated Transacranial Magnetic Stimulation

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether Neuromodulation-Induced-Cortical-Prehabilitation (NICP)-using physical therapy (constraint-induced movement training, CIM) alone or combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)-can promote motor-cortex neuroplasticity before surgery in adults with high-grade gliomas near the motor pathway. It will also learn about the feasibility and safety of these prehabilitation strategies around the time of surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does CIM (with or without rTMS) produce measurable motor-cortex plasticity from baseline to pre-surgery as assessed by neuronavigated TMS (nTMS)?
  2. Does adding rTMS to CIM lead to greater neuroplastic changes than CIM alone?
  3. What clinical, radiological, and neurophysiological outcomes are observed after surgery in participants who receive prehabilitation compared with controls?

Researchers will compare standard care (control) vs CIM-based physical therapy vs CIM plus rTMS to see if these approaches induce preoperative neuroplastic changes that may support better surgical outcomes. Participants will:

  1. Be randomized to one of three groups: control, CIM physical therapy, or CIM + rTMS• Undergo nTMS motor mapping and excitability testing at baseline (T0) and the day before surgery (T1)
  2. Undergo planned tumor surgery (according to standard methods of care) and complete postoperative clinical, imaging, and neurophysiological follow-up assessments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background. The Neuromodulation-Induced-Cortical-Prehabilitation (NICP) is a groundbreaking idea to promote plastic brain changes and, theoretically, to increase the Extent of Resection in brain gliomas improving the surgical outcomes. Moreover, given the infiltrative nature of brain gliomas, NICP could be consistently worthwhile for the patient's clinical outcome, reducing the likelihood of premeditated neurologic sequelae and/or the time-to-recovery during the post-surgical rehabilitation.

Hypothesis, Research Need. Up to date only small case series have analysed NICP-induced neuroplasticity, complicating data interpretation. Our study aims to thoroughly measure through neuronavigated Transcranial-Magnetic-Stimulation (nTMS) the plastic brain changes of Physical Therapy (in particular Constraint-Induced-Movements - CIM), repetitive-TMS (rTMS) and the combination of these two techniques in high-grade gliomas (HGGs) close to the motor pathway before surgery to improve surgical outcomes for the benefit of the patient.

Methodology. This is a multi-center, prospective, randomized pilot trial. The patients are randomized in 3 groups (A. Control Group, B. Physical Therapy Group, C. Physical Therapy+rTMS Group; randomization 1:2:2). The participants undergo motor cortex analysis through nTMS at the baseline - T0 - and the day before surgery - T1. Postoperative clinical, radiological and neurophyisiological outcomes are also gathered.

Patient Enrolment:

  • Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano, Italy
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) di Verona, Italy

Data analysis:

  • Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano, Italy
  • Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMEC, University of Trento, Italy
  • Department of Neurorehabilitation, Hospital of Vipiteno, SABES-ASDAA), Vipiteno, Italy

Analysis Tools:

  1. Measurement of neuroplasticity with TMS(Nextim NBS System 5 in Bolzano/EbNeruo STM9000 in Verona). Cortical changes in motor representations will be addressed with:a) nTMS mapping of the motor cortex representations (MEP amplitude and waveforms) on individual anatomical imagesb)
  2. Single-pulse indexes of motor cortical excitability:

    • Cortical Silent Period
    • Recruitment Curve
    • Resting Motor Threshold (and intehemispheric ratio)
  3. Dual-pulse measures of cortical excitability:

    • Short-latency intracortical inhibition/facilitation
    • Short-latency afferent inhibition

Expected Outcomes. The investigators don't expect any variation in cortical neuroplasticity between T0 and T1 in group A. On the contrary, The investigators expect a variation in group B, in group C and in group B vs. C.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-80
  2. Suspect of High Grade Glioma in MRI
  3. Any case of cortical/subcortical HGG radiologically close to Motor Pathway and, thus, where intraoperative monitoring assistance is usually required
  4. Preservation of motor function (at least ≥ 3 according to Medical Research Council classification)
  5. Signed informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Refusal to Study participation
  2. Multifocal/Bilateral Disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control (no NICP)
Physical Therapy Group
Experimental: Physical Therapy Group: patients who undergo only physical therapy
Physical Therapy protocol for the 10 days preceding surgery: 6h/day Constraint Induced Movement - CIM (immobilization of the ipsilesional hand - unaffected side) + 1h twice a day of fine motor skills focused exercises (e.g. 9-hole peg test) on the controlateral hand (affected side)
Physical Therapy protocol for the 10 days preceding surgery: 6h/day Constraint Induced Movement - CIM (immobilization of the ipsilesional hand - unaffected side) + 1h twice a day of fine motor skills focused exercises (e.g. 9-hole peg test) on the controlateral hand (affected side)
Experimental: Combined Therapy Group: patients who undergo physical therapy + rTMS
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation protocol for the 10 days preceding surgery: This will be done following standard protocols mediated from the protocols for motor and language function in stroke, i.e, daily sessions of 1Hz rTMS for 20 minutes applied to the contralesional hemisphere. • Physical Therapy protocol for the 10 days preceding surgery: 6h/day Constraint Induced Movement - CIM (immobilization of the ipsilesional hand - unaffected side) + 1h twice a day of fine motor skills focused exercises (e.g. 9-hole peg test) on the controlateral hand (affected side)
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation protocol for the 10 days preceding surgery: This will be done following standard protocols mediated from the protocols for motor and language function in stroke, i.e, daily sessions of 1Hz rTMS for 20 minutes applied to the contralesional hemisphere. • Physical Therapy protocol for the 10 days preceding surgery: 6h/day Constraint Induced Movement - CIM (immobilization of the ipsilesional hand - unaffected side) + 1h twice a day of fine motor skills focused exercises (e.g. 9-hole peg test) on the controlateral hand (affected side)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of neuroplasticity with nTMS
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the date of surgery, assessed up to 15 days
Cortical changes in motor representations will be addressed with Neuronavigated TMS mapping of the motor representations (MEP amplitude and waveforms) of the cortical surface of the peri-Rolandic region on individual anatomical images (Nextim NBS System 5 in Bolzano/EbNeruo STM9000 in Verona). We will consider as primary outcome variable the extension of the cortical surface from which MEPs can be obtained by neuronavigated TMS on the affected hemisphere during the procedure of neuronavigation. This index will be calculated quantitatively as surface area, on the flattened cortical surface, and on the "density" of MEP amplitude on such surface. In addition, we will carry out a quantitative analysis of how many excitable points are present in different cortical regions, by applying the cortical atlas by Glasser et al. (2016) to the patient's brain. In this way we will also be able to quantify the extension of excitable points to the premotor or even non-motor cortical regions.
From the date of randomization until the date of surgery, assessed up to 15 days
Measurement of neuroplasticity with TMS
Time Frame: From the date of randomization until the date of surgery, assessed up to 15 days
  1. Single-pulse indexes of motor cortical excitability (unit of measure milli Volt - mV):

    • Cortical Silent Period (CSP)
    • Recruitment (input-output) Curve (RC)
    • Resting Motor Threshold (rMT) and intehemispheric rMT ratio (rMT ratio)
  2. Dual-pulse measures of cortical excitability (Adimensional; they are MEP-derived ratios . MEP amplitudes are measured in mV).):

    • Short-latency intracortical inhibition/facilitation (SICI and SICF)
    • Short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI)
From the date of randomization until the date of surgery, assessed up to 15 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of neuroplasticity with TMS (after surgery)
Time Frame: At 1 month and 3 months after surgery

Cortical changes in motor representations will be addressed with:

Neuronavigated TMS mapping of the motor representations (MEP amplitude and waveforms) of the cortical surface of the peri-Rolandic region on individual anatomical images (Nextim NBS System 5 in Bolzano/EbNeruo STM9000 in Verona)

At 1 month and 3 months after surgery
Measurement of neuroplasticity with TMS
Time Frame: At 1 month and 3 months after surgery
  1. Single-pulse indexes of motor cortical excitability (measured in mV):

    Cortical Silent Period (CSP) Recruitment (input-output) Curve (RC) Resting Motor Threshold (rMT) and intehemispheric rMT ratio (rMT ratio)

  2. Dual-pulse measures of cortical excitability (Adimensional; they are MEP-derived ratios - MEP amplitudes are measured in mV):

Short-latency intracortical inhibition/facilitation (SICI and SICF) Short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI)

At 1 month and 3 months after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiological outcome
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
Initial Tumor Volume (ITV), Gross Total vs Subtotal Resection (GTR vs STR), Residual Tumor Volume (RTV) These volumes will be measured in mL.
From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
Clinical Outcome
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
Muscular Strenght Evaluation according to Medical Research Council (1-5)
From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
Clinical Outcome
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
Apraxia Network evaluation: 10-ideomotor apraxia task (score from 0 to 20)
From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
Clinical Outcome
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
9-hole peg test (seconds)
From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
Clinical Outcome
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
Function scale for upper limb: ARAT, Action Research Arm Test (score 0-57)
From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
Clinical Outcome
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery
Function scale for upper limb: FM-UE, Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity scale (score 0-66)
From date of randomization until 3 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pier Paolo Berti, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA) - L. Boehler street n5 Bolzano, BZ, Italy 39100

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Boccuni L,Roca-Ventura A,Buloz-Osorio E,Leno-Colorado D,Delgado-Gallén S,Cabello-Toscano M,Perellón-Alfonso R,Villalba-Martínez G,Martínez-Ricarte F,Martín-Fernández J,Buxeda-Rodriguez M,Conesa-Bertrán G,Illueca-Moreno M,Lladó-Carbó E,Perla Y Perla C,Garrido C,Pariente JC,Laredo C,Muñoz-Moreno E,Bargalló N,Trompetto C,Marinelli L,Bartrés-Faz D,Abellaneda-Pérez K,Pascual-Leone A,Tormos-Muñoz JM
  • Gulrandhe P,Acharya S,Patel M,Shukla S,Kumar S
  • Sheng R,Chen C,Chen H,Yu P
  • de Almeida CC,Neville IS,Hayashi CY,Gomes Dos Santos A,Brunoni AR,Teixeira MJ,Paiva WS
  • Hamer RP,Yeo TT
  • Cargnelutti E,Ius T,Skrap M,Tomasino B

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified IPD necessary to reproduce the primary and secondary analyses, including variables used in the statistical models (baseline characteristics, key covariates, endpoints, and safety outcomes), together with the data dictionary and statistical code. Data not required for the planned analyses and variables posing an increased re-identification risk will not be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access will be provided to qualified researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal. Approved requestors will be granted access to de-identified IPD underlying the published results, the data dictionary/codebook, and the statistical analysis code. Requests should be sent by email to the study sponsor/principal investigator and will be reviewed by a data access committee (or the study team). Access will be provided after signing a data use agreement and only for the purpose approved in the proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioma

Clinical Trials on Physical Therapy

Subscribe