- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07487857
Intensive Somatosensory Camp for Manual Function and Participation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (CAMPUSENS)
Intensive Somatosensory Camp for Manual Function and Participation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: a Randomnized Controlled Trial
This study will evaluate whether an intensive day camp that combines somatosensory and motor training for the affected upper limb improves hand function and participation in children with unilateral cerebral palsy more than an intensive motor-only camp of equal duration and intensity. Children aged 5 to 15 years with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels I-III will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups. The experimental group will receive an 8-day, 40-hour camp including structured tactile, proprioceptive and vestibular stimulation integrated into meaningful functional tasks for the upper limb. The control group will receive an 8-day, 40-hour camp focused exclusively on intensive motor training without specific somatosensory stimulation.
The primary outcome is the change in spontaneous bimanual performance of the affected hand, measured with the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA). Secondary outcomes include measures of unilateral upper limb function, somatosensory function, hand grip strength, gross motor function, balance, trunk control, participation in daily activities and objective upper limb activity measured with wrist-worn accelerometers. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at follow-up visits approximately 2 and 3 months after the camp.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Unilateral cerebral palsy is a common cause of motor disability in childhood and is frequently associated with somatosensory impairments of the affected upper limb, such as reduced tactile discrimination, impaired proprioception and difficulties with object recognition by touch. These sensory deficits contribute to learned non-use of the affected hand and limited spontaneous bimanual performance in daily activities, even when basic motor abilities are present. Intensive upper limb therapies, such as constraint-induced movement therapy and bimanual training, have shown positive effects on hand function, but most programs focus primarily on motor components and do not systematically target somatosensory function.
This randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial will compare two parallel intensive day-camp interventions for children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Both groups will receive 40 hours of therapy over 8 consecutive days (5 hours per day) in a group-based camp format. The experimental group will participate in a structured somatosensory-motor program that integrates tactile, proprioceptive and vestibular stimulation within play-based, goal-oriented upper limb activities and functional workshops. Daily sessions include sensory activation (e.g., tactile massage, exploration of different textures), intensive tactile discrimination and haptic tasks (e.g., object recognition without vision, graded textures, vibration), and integration of somatosensory input into functional tasks and postural control activities (e.g., balance exercises on unstable surfaces, tasks with light weights).
The control group will receive an intensive motor-focused camp with the same total dose, schedule and therapist supervision. Activities will target active range of motion, strength, coordination, and functional use of the affected upper limb through standard manual tasks (such as reaching, grasping, building with blocks, threading, and fine motor games) and gross motor upper limb exercises and circuits, without structured somatosensory stimulation.
The primary objective is to determine whether the somatosensory-motor camp produces greater improvements in spontaneous bimanual performance of the affected hand, assessed by the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), compared with the motor-only camp. Secondary objectives include examining changes in unilateral upper limb movement quality (e.g., Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function), detailed somatosensory function (e.g., standardized assessments of tactile perception, two-point discrimination, proprioception and stereognosis), grip strength, gross motor function and balance, trunk control, participation and goal attainment, as well as objective upper limb activity recorded by wrist accelerometry in and outside the camp setting. Assessments will be conducted at baseline (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1, after 8 days) and at follow-up visits approximately 2 and 3 months after the camp.
The study is designed as a minimal-risk pediatric rehabilitation trial and follows ethical and data protection regulations. Randomization will be centralized, and outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Rocío Palomo Carrión PhD
- Phone Number: +34 926051821
- Email: rocio.palomo@uclm.es
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of spastic CP
- aged between 5 and 15 years of age
- able to follow simple verbal instructions and complete all the necessary tests according to their ages
- MACS level I-III
Exclusion Criteria:
- uncontrolled epilepsy episodes in the 6 months prior to the start of the study
- botulinum toxin in the last 6 months
- orthopedic or neurological surgery in the 12 months prior to the start of the study or scheduled during the intervention development period
- visual or cognitive disabilities that interfere with treatment
- unable to actively participate in the activities
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental: Somatosensory-Motor Intensive Camp
8-day intensive day camp (40 hours total, 5 hours/day) for children with unilateral cerebral palsy.
Combines structured somatosensory training (tactile discrimination, texture exploration, vibration stimulation, proprioception, vestibular input) integrated within functional upper limb motor tasks, play-based workshops, and balance activities targeting bimanual hand function and participation.
|
Structured 8-day intensive rehabilitation camp (40 hours total, 5 hours/day) focused exclusively on upper limb motor training for children with unilateral cerebral palsy.
Includes active range of motion exercises, grip strength training, fine motor coordination tasks (grasping, threading, block manipulation), reaching/coordination circuits without structured somatosensory stimulation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Active Comparator: Motor Camp
8-day intensive day camp (40 hours total, 5 hours/day) focused exclusively on upper limb motor training for children with unilateral cerebral palsy.
Includes active range of motion exercises, strength training, coordination circuits, grasping/manipulation tasks, and fine motor activities without structured somatosensory stimulation
|
Structured 8-day intensive rehabilitation camp (40 hours total, 5 hours/day) for children with unilateral cerebral palsy.
Integrates somatosensory stimulation (tactile massage, texture discrimination, vibration therapy, proprioceptive exercises, vestibular/balance activities) within functional upper limb motor tasks, play-based workshops, and bimanual activities targeting spontaneous hand use and participation in daily activities.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
Change in spontaneous bimanual hand use of the affected upper limb in children with unilateral cerebral palsy, measured by the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA).
The AHA is a video-based, criterion-referenced measure of how effectively a child with a unilateral hand impairment spontaneously uses their affected hand during bimanual play activities.
Scores range from 0-100 (higher scores indicate better bimanual performance).
|
Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function Version 2 (MA-2)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
Quality of unilateral upper limb movement (range of motion, accuracy, dexterity, fluency) in children with unilateral cerebral palsy, measured by video analysis using MA-2 standardized criteria.
|
Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
|
Somatosensory Function (SWM, 2PD, Stereognosis)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at one month (T2)
|
Tactile discrimination and somatosensory function of the affected hand measured by Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments (SWM) for touch threshold, two-point discrimination (static/dynamic), localization, double simultaneous stimulation, and stereognosis (object recognition by touch).
|
Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at one month (T2)
|
|
Hand Grip Strength (Jamar Dynamometer)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at one month (T2)
|
Maximum cylindrical grip strength (kg) of affected and non-affected hands, measured in standardized sitting position with 3 trials per hand using Jamar hydraulic dynamometer.
|
Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at one month (T2)
|
|
Upper Limb Activity (Wrist Accelerometry)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), during daily life in camps days, immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at one month (T2)
|
Objective measurement of spontaneous upper limb movement quantity and intensity using wrist-worn accelerometers on both wrists during AHA assessment and daily life outside camp.
|
Baseline (T0), during daily life in camps days, immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at one month (T2)
|
|
Participation (COPM, PEM-CY)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
Family-identified functional priorities and participation in daily activities measured by Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) performance/satisfaction scores and Participation Environmental Measure-Children and Youth (PEM-CY) frequency/involvement dimensions in school, home and community.
|
Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
|
GMFM-66 (Gross Motor Function Measure-66 Item Set)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
It is a validated observational instrument that assesses changes in gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy from 5 months to 16 years of age.
It consists of 66 items grouped into five dimensions (supine/rolled over, sitting, crawling/kneeling, standing/walking).
Scoring is expressed as a percentage (0-100).
The Item Set groups the items according to age and the corresponding GMFCS level, thus shortening the assessment and eliminating the need to examine all 66 items of the original GMFM-66.
The score is then calculated using the GMAE software.
|
Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
|
Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
This is a modified version of the Berg Balance Scale for school-aged children (4-15 years) with mild-to-moderate motor disabilities.
It assesses 14 functional static/dynamic balance tasks (sitting, standing, reaching, turning).
Each item is scored from 0-4 (maximum total 56).
It will be used up to age 8 in this study.
|
Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
|
Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS-S)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
It is used to measure trunk control during functional activities in a seated position.
It provides a structured and quantitative assessment of how a person controls their trunk both statically and in motion, including balance, selective trunk movements, and dynamic reach beyond the base of support.
It is validated for individuals with neuromotor impairment aged 5 to 19 years.
|
Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days), follow-up at 1 month (T2)
|
|
Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days)
|
This is an online questionnaire completed by parents and/or the child that assesses the perception of hand use during different bimanual activities.
It has two versions: the mini-CHEQ for children aged 3-8 years and the CHEQ for children aged 6-18 years.
The questionnaire is completed by parents for children under 13 years of age.
For children over 13 years of age, both parents and children complete it.
It takes 20-30 minutes to complete.
|
Baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1, 8 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CAMPUSENS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, Diplegic | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy With Spasticity | Transcranial Magnetic StimilationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesRecruiting
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyCanada
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Unilateral Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
University of California, San FranciscoNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) | Infant | Cerebral Palsy InfantileUnited States
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesNot yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyPakistan
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | EEG | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Action ObservationItaly
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisUniversity of Siena, ItalyRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Motor Imagery | CP (Cerebral Palsy) | Action ObservationItaly
-
University of LahoreCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy | Balance | Gross Motor FunctionsPakistan
Clinical Trials on Motor-Only Intensive Camp
-
MedStar National Rehabilitation NetworkGeorgetown University; University of Wisconsin, Madison; Medstar Health Research... and other collaboratorsUnknownStroke | Cerebrovascular Disorders | Brain Ischemia | Cerebral Infarction | Brain InfarctionUnited States
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedStroke | Rehabilitation | Motor FunctionKorea, Republic of
-
Seoul National University HospitalSeoul Metropolitan GovernmentCompletedAlzheimer DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di ModenaAzienda Unita Sanitaria Locale Reggio Emilia; University of Modena and Reggio... and other collaboratorsCompletedAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisItaly
-
Annemie SpoorenUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven; University of Aarhus; University Hospital... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSpinal Cord InjuriesNetherlands, Belgium
-
National Taiwan University HospitalRecruiting
-
Sara Shahid SallesWings for LifeTerminatedSpinal Cord Injuries | Tetraplegia, Unspecified, Incomplete, ChronicUnited States
-
University of KentuckyTerminatedStroke | HemiparesisUnited States
-
University of KentuckyTerminatedStrokeUnited States
-
Universidad Autonoma de MadridUnknown