Community Safety and Violence

March 20, 2026 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Estimating the Impact of Alternative Crisis Response Models on Community Violence

This study will describe, estimate, and explore the effectiveness of community-centered safety models (CCSMs)-including co-response, alternative response, and community violence intervention modalities-implemented across U.S. municipalities to prevent community violence among youth and young adults (YYA). Specifically, the investigators will (1) describe CCSM implementation using implementation-science methods, (2) estimate CCSMs' impacts on community-violence outcomes using quasi-experimental methods, and (3) explore operational and contextual factors associated with stronger or weaker effects.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Recruiting
        • NYU Langone Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This protocol does not involve prospective enrollment or direct interaction with individuals. The "participants" in this study are:

  1. Jurisdictions/sites (U.S. cities/counties) operating fully implemented community-centered safety models (CCSMs)-co-response, alternative response, or community violence intervention; and
  2. Community populations within those jurisdictions, represented only through secondary, de-identified or limited administrative datasets (e.g., violent deaths, nonfatal injury encounters, crime/arrest records) used for population-level analyses.

Youth and young adults (YYA; ~ages 10-34) are a focal analytic subgroup because they bear a disproportionate burden of community violence. No individuals are recruited, contacted, or intervened upon.

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Jurisdiction/Sites:

  1. Intervention modality clarity: A single, identifiable CCSM-Co-Response (CRM), Alternative Response (ARM), or Community Violence Intervention (CVI)-implemented at city/county level.
  2. Documented launch date & scope: Public or official documentation specifying program start date, catchment, operating hours, staffing, eligibility, and core activities.
  3. Observation window: ≥24 months pre-implementation and ≥12 months post-implementation of outcome data (monthly preferred; annual acceptable for fatal outcomes).
  4. Outcomes coverage: Availability of primary outcomes (fatal and nonfatal violent injury) and at least one secondary justice outcome at the jurisdiction level.
  5. Data quality: Stable geographic boundaries, consistent reporting practices, and no catastrophic breaks that preclude credible counterfactual fit.
  6. Donor comparability: Jurisdiction characteristics and data cadence compatible with a pooled augmented synthetic control design (i.e., can be matched to a synthetic control and included in permutation tests).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pilot-only or indeterminate programs: Short-lived pilots, ambiguous or multi-modality rollouts where treatment timing or content cannot be reliably defined.
  2. Severe data discontinuity: Major boundary changes, reporting suspensions, coding overhauls, or dataset gaps that undermine time-series integrity (e.g., prolonged outages during system migration) and cannot be addressed with standard remedies.
  3. Overlapping major interventions: Concurrent, poorly measured citywide initiatives (e.g., sweeping policy bundles) that coincide with the CCSM start and make identification infeasible.
  4. Insufficient pre-period: <24 months pre-implementation data for primary outcomes.
  5. Incompatible cadence/aggregation: Outcomes only available at spatial or temporal units that cannot be aligned with other sites or donors.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
U.S. Cities/Counties
Approximately 15 U.S. cities/counties (≈5 per CCSM modality) selected for evaluability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Homicide Rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 36
Measured as deaths per 100,000 (annual).
Baseline, Month 36
Firearm Homicide Rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 36
Measured as deaths per 100,000 (annual).
Baseline, Month 36
Assault-related ED & inpatient encounters (combined) rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 36
Measured as visits/admissions per 10,000 (monthly).
Baseline, Month 36
Firearm-assault-related ED & inpatient encounters (combined) rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 36
Measured as hospitalizations per 10,000 (monthly).
Baseline, Month 36
Nonfatal firearm assault rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 36
Measured as hospitalizations per 10,000 (monthly).
Baseline, Month 36

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aggravated assault arrest rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 36
Measured as arrests per 10,000 (monthly).
Baseline, Month 36
Weapons-related arrest rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 36
Measured as arrests per 10,000 (monthly).
Baseline, Month 36
Robbery arrest rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 36
Measured as arrests per 10,000 (monthly).
Baseline, Month 36
Juvenile arrest rate
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 36
Measured as arrests per 10,000 juveniles (monthly).
Baseline, Month 36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bennett Allen, PhD, NYU Langone Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 29, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 29, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 25-01382
  • R01CE003770 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Community-Centered Safety

Subscribe