Efficacy and Safety Comparison Between Intensified Therapy and Conversion Therapy For Advanced HCC After Failure of First-line

March 24, 2026 updated by: Shi Ming, Sun Yat-sen University

Efficacy and Safety Comparison Between Intensified Therapy (Plus Lenvatinib) and Conversion Therapy (Regorafenib Combined With PD-(L)1 Inhibitor) For Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Failure of First-line Bevacizumab Plus Sintilimab: A Prospective, Randomized, Two-Cohort, Phase II Study

Although immunotherapy-based therapies (including targeted-immunotherapy or dual-immunotherapy protocols) have become the first-line standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there remains a lack of high-level evidence to guide the selection of second-line therapies following progression in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Additionally, direct comparative data are scarce for combination treatment modalities such as "continuation of the original first-line regimen with added agents" or "switching to agents with different mechanisms".

To address this clinical need and explore novel second-line treatment strategies for advanced HCC, we plan to conduct an exploratory clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety comparison between intensified therapy (plus lenvatinib) and conversion therapy (regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of fFirst-line bevacizumab plus sintilimab.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
        • Recruiting
        • Sun yat-sen University Cancer Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on histological or clinical diagnostic criteria;
  2. Classified as unresectable HCC following multidisciplinary assessment;
  3. Presence of at least one tumor lesion measurable according to EASL criteria;
  4. Child-Pugh liver function class A/B, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) score 0-2;
  5. Disease progression confirmed by CT/MRI and evaluated according to modified RECIST (mRECIST)/RECIST v1.1 criteria after ≥2 cycles of first-line therapy with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenous infusion, once every 3 weeks) combined with sintilimab (200 mg intravenous infusion, once every 3 weeks);
  6. Received ≥2 cycles of post-progression treatment with bevacizumab plus sintilimab, lenvatinib, or regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitors;
  7. Age ≥18 and ≤75 years;
  8. Capability to comprehend the study protocol and provide written informed consent;
  9. Laboratory parameters: hemoglobin(Hb) ≥8.5 g/dL, white blood cell (WBC) count >2000/mm³, platelet (PLT) count ≥75,000/mm³, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1500/mm³, total bilirubin ≤30 μmol/L, serum albumin ≥30 g/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), serum creatinine ≤1.5 times ULN, international normalized ratio (INR) ≤1.5, prothrombin time (PT) ≤18 seconds;
  10. Availability of complete baseline data, treatment records, and follow-up data (including imaging assessments, laboratory tests, and clinical documentation).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Life expectancy ≤2 months;
  2. Presence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, or other non-HCC malignancies;
  3. Active concurrent malignancy or severe comorbid conditions;
  4. First-line treatment with other anticancer therapies (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, or other interventions) concurrently;
  5. Pregnancy or lactation;
  6. Known hypersensitivity to study drugs;
  7. Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to enrollment;
  8. Refusal to comply with study and/or follow-up procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intensified Therapy Group
Bevacizumab, Sintilimab, Lenvatinib.
Bevacizumab, 15mg/kg, iv drip, q3w; Sintilimab, 200mg/dose, iv drip, q3w; Lenvatinib, for weight ≤60 kg, 8 mg/d, po, qd; for weight >60 kg, 12 mg/d, po, qd.
Experimental: Conversion Therapy Group
Regorafenib, PD-1 inhibitor.
Regorafenib, 160mg/d, po, qd; PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab, Camrelizumab, Tislelizumab, Toripalimab, Pembrolizumab), 200mg/dose, iv drip, q3w.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 6 months
OS is the length of time from the date of randomization until death from any cause.
6 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 6 months
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression or death due to any cause.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 6 months
ORR, as determined based on tumor response according to RECIST 1.1, is defined as the proportion of all randomized subjects whose best overall response (BOR) is either a CR or PR.
6 months
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 30 days
ORR, as determined based on tumor response according to RECIST 1.1, is defined as the proportion of all randomized subjects whose best overall response (BOR) is either a CR or PR.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SinBev+Len

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellulcar Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Intensified Therapy

Subscribe