Empowerment Training for Personal Agency Development of Primary Health Care Workers

March 29, 2026 updated by: Anuraj Shankar, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit Indonesia

Strengthening Personal Agency and Service Performance Among Primary Health Care Workers Through a Complex Empowerment Intervention

This study evaluates an Empowerment Agency Training (EAT) intervention within the SPHERES programme that aims to strengthen personal agency among workers in primary healthcare centers (Puskesmas) in Indonesia. The intervention focuses on building self-efficacy, behavioural control, leadership, and intentional decision-making through structured training, follow-up action planning, observational support, and sustainability-oriented incentives. Strengthening personal agency is expected to improve the use of data for decision-making and the delivery of priority primary health services at the Puskesmas level.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study evaluates a complex intervention in the form of an Empowerment Agency Training (EAT) implemented as an integral component of the SPHERES programme (NCT07126041) in Indonesia. The intervention is grounded in the recognition that, within digital health ecosystems, investments in technology and data systems have not consistently translated into improved service delivery due to limited individual capacity, behavioural adaptation, and organisational readiness among health workers. The EAT intervention therefore focuses on strengthening personal agency among Puskesmas staff, defined as the capacity to act intentionally, regulate behaviour, exercise leadership, and make informed decisions in complex work environments.

The EAT intervention comprises four interrelated components delivered in an integrated and adaptive manner. First, empowerment through a personal agency approach is delivered via structured training sessions aimed at strengthening self-awareness, self-efficacy, leadership, assertiveness, and mastery of the work environment. Second, participants develop behaviour-related follow-up action plans that translate personal agency concepts into concrete and achievable changes in daily work practices, including communication, task management, teamwork, and the use of health data for decision-making. Third, expert shadowing provides direct observational support to understand real-world service dynamics. Fourth, sustainability-oriented incentives, including opportunities for advanced training and locally governed financial incentives, are used to reinforce engagement and support longer-term adoption of new practices.

Within the SPHERES programme, the digitalisation of health information systems is deliberately complemented by interventions that address human and organisational factors. By embedding EAT within SPHERES, the intervention is designed to ensure that digital tools and data systems are actively interpreted, used, and translated into service improvements, rather than functioning solely as mechanisms for routine reporting.

The intervention is evaluated using a cluster randomised controlled trial design, in which Puskesmas that are already participating in the SPHERES programme are randomly assigned to receive the additional Empowerment Agency Training (EAT) intervention. The study population includes all staff working at participating Puskesmas, with total population sampling applied at the facility level to ensure comprehensive exposure to the intervention and to minimise contamination. To assess service-related outcomes, selected health service users from Puskesmas catchment areas are also included. Community-level sampling for outcome assessment uses probability-based approaches proportional to population size.

Primary outcomes include clinical data quality, including its completeness and submission timeliness, and changes in personal agency and health worker behaviour, particularly the use of health data for planning and decision-making. Additional outcomes include selected priority health service indicators at the Puskesmas level, such as coverage and quality of maternal, child, and non-communicable disease services. Outcome data are derived from validated personal agency survey instruments administered to health workers, as well as routine service data captured through digital health information systems integrated within the SPHERES platform.

The evaluation adopts a convergent mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data are collected longitudinally before and after intervention implementation to assess changes in outcomes over time. Qualitative data from in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations are collected in parallel to examine contextual factors influencing implementation, mechanisms of change, acceptability, and sustainability of the intervention. Quantitative and qualitative findings are analysed separately and integrated during interpretation to provide a comprehensive understanding of intervention effects and implementation processes.

At a broader level, this study is designed to generate evidence relevant to national health system development in Indonesia. By evaluating a complex, people-centred intervention embedded within a national digital health transformation programme, the findings are expected to inform policy decisions related to health workforce development, digital health scale-up, and the sustainable integration of system-level interventions into routine primary health care across nuanced settings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Ris HN Sitinjak, M.Sc., Pharm.
  • Phone Number: +62 +62-813-4777-9810
  • Email: rsitinjak@oucru.org

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Central Java
      • Purbalingga, Central Java, Indonesia
        • Purbalingga District Health Office
        • Contact:
    • West Nusa Tenggara
      • Gerung, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
        • Lombok Barat District Health Office
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Registered staff of the intervention clusters (PHCs), either as registered civil servant, contract workers, or honorary workers.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PHC staff who decline to provide informed consent.
  • PHC staff who will not retain their employment until the end of the observation period.
  • Participants who are not in good physical and mental condition to attend the training intervention (for the intervention arm).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Empowerment Training Arm
Health care providers in the intervention clusters (PHCs).
The intervention comprises a behavioral training program focused on personal agency and empowerment. The curriculum follows the established frameworks developed by The Self-Empowerment and Equity for Change (SEE Change) Initiative at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The training is followed by simple, practical "prescription", or action plans, for behaviour change in daily work. Implementation is supported through direct observation by facilitators (expert shadowing) and incentives, including advanced training opportunities and locally managed financial support.
No Intervention: Control Arm
Health care providers in the non-intervention clusters (PHCs).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in clinical data quality between intervention and control arms, and changes in personal agency and health worker behaviour
Time Frame: Up to 6 months

Clinical data quality is determined by proportion of data entry in the digital health information system compared to the gold standard (legacy reporting system). Other metrics being the heaping index indicating digit preference in numeric clinical data input in various services, and also the proportion of biologically implausible values.

Changes in personal agency and health worker behaviour is determined by the proportion of action derived from data-driven discussion, as well as the overall level of patient satisfaction from the care delivery.

Up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Completeness of care in maternal and neonatal care
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
  • of pregnant women with at least six timely ANC services (K1 - K6)
  • of pregnant women with complete services per ANC encounter
  • of newborn with at least three timely PNC services (Kn1 - Kn3)
  • of mothers with newborn with at least four timely PNC services (Kf1 - Kf4) Neonatal mortality rate Stillbirth rate

All indicators will be measured using the SPHERES dashboard.

Up to 6 months
Completeness of care in tuberculosis treatment
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
  • of TB suspect screened
  • of TB diagnosis from all screened suspects
  • of TB patients receiving medications
  • of TP patients being loss to follow-up
  • of TB patients with complete recovery

All indicators will be measured using the SPHERES dashboard.

Up to 6 months
Completeness of care in hypertensive treatment
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
  • of people screened for hypertension
  • of people with hypertension diagnosis
  • of hypertensive patient receiving medications
  • of hypertensive patient with controlled blood pressure

All indicators will be measured using the SPHERES dashboard.

Up to 6 months
Completeness of care in diabetes treatment
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
  • of people screened
  • of people with diabetes diagnosis
  • of diabetes patient receiving medications
  • of people with controlled HbA1c All indicators will be measured using the SPHERES dashboard.
Up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 10, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The study will not share individual participant data due to the population-level nature of the intervention and national data privacy regulations. Only aggregated and de-identified/anonymized data and codebook may be made publicly available upon publication.

All data collection, storage, and analysis procedures will comply with Indonesia's Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP), Ministry of Health guidance, and institutional ethical standards.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burnout

Clinical Trials on Empowerment Agency Training (EAT)

Subscribe