Local Radiotherapy for Urinary Bladder Cancer in Patients Not Eligible for Curative Treatment (LORUP)

May 20, 2026 updated by: Karin Soderkvist, Umeå University

Local Radiotherapy for Urinary Bladder Cancer in Patients Not Eligible for Curative Treatment; a Prospective Randomized Phase III Trial.

The goal of this clinical trial is to improve the quality of life and prolong survival in bladder cancer patients unfit for curative treatment. The trial will compare the survival and symptoms of patients randomized to either local radiotherapy in addition to standard of care or standard of care alone.

Using modern radiotherapy techniques, including hypofractionation and image-guided treatment adaptation, the aim is to deliver a well-tolerated, time-efficient, and effective treatment strategy for these patients.

The trial collaborates with two ongoing exploratory biomarker studies collecting and analyzing potential biomarkers in urothelial bladder cancer. The hope is to provide biomarkers for prognosis and treatment response which is essential to ensure bladder cancer patients individualized treatment in the future, like those with breast and prostate cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Around 700 individuals in Sweden are diagnosed each year with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and a similar number die annually from the disease (SVF RCC 2023). With a median age at diagnosis approaching 76 years (Swedish National Quality Registry for Urothelial Carcinoma), the incidence is expected to rise as the population ages.

Due to advanced age and comorbidity, many patients are not eligible for the demanding multimodal treatments used with curative intent. Recently introduced systemic therapies for palliation, such as antibody-drug conjugates and immunotherapy, also require a WHO performance status <2 and regular hospital-based administration. Consequently, up to 30% of patients receive no tumor-directed therapy at diagnosis (Swedish National Quality Registry for Urothelial Carcinoma).

Without treatment, MIBC often progresses rapidly, with a median overall survival of approximately 12 months in this cohort. Symptom burden is substantial, commonly involving pain, bleeding, and urinary tract obstruction, which frequently require repeated hospital admissions late in the disease trajectory.

Radiation therapy (RT) is an established curative modality in bladder cancer and is well documented for symptom palliation. In other malignancies, such as prostate cancer, limited radiation doses have been shown to prolong survival and reduce the development of distressing symptoms. Although some studies indicate similar benefits in bladder cancer, a clear survival effect has not been demonstrated, representing an important knowledge gap in the management of a common cancer type.

The LORUP project builds on existing translational research infrastructures to address this gap. Its aim is to develop a treatment strategy for MIBC patients unfit for curative therapy, focused on improving quality of life by reducing symptom burden and potentially prolonging survival, while maintaining a low treatment burden and minimal side effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

248

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Västerbotten County
      • Umeå, Västerbotten County, Sweden, 90185
        • Recruiting
        • Norrlands University Hosital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Oral and written consent
  2. Histologically confirmed MIBC with urothelial component
  3. Male or female participants ≥ 18 years old
  4. Deemed not to benefit from curative treatment at a multidisciplinary tumour conference (MDT) or having declined curative treatment of their own accord.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical Fragility Scale score ≥8
  2. Previous pelvic RT with significant overlap
  3. Visceral or bone metastases on CT scan
  4. Multiple (>3) lymph node metastases with a measurement of >2 cm on CT scan
  5. Planed for systemic treatment at the time of inclusion.
  6. Local RT to the bladder indicated for the palliation of symptoms at the time of inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A - RT and SoC
Local hypo fractionated adaptive radiotherapy to the bladder, 7 Gy in 3 fractions delivered every other day (eod) prescribed in addition to standard of care.

Patients randomized to the radiotherapy (RT) arm will receive external beam radiotherapy to the whole urinary bladder as well as Standard of Care.

Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy will be delivered using an adaptive treatment strategy, permitting either:

  • Plan-of-the-day (PoD) adaptive radiotherapy using a predefined library of plans, or
  • Online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) with daily re-contouring and re-optimisation to the anatomy of the day.

The choice of adaptive strategy (PoD vs oART) and imaging modality (CBCT- or MR-based) is at institutional discretion, provided all protocol-specified target coverage objectives and organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints are met.

The prescribed dose is 21 Gy in 3 fractions of 7 Gy, delivered every other day.

Active Comparator: Arm B - SoC
Standard of care. All applicable palliative treatments, such as local RT, TURB, systemic anti-tumour treatments or other interventions/treatments applicable according to treating physician are allowed.
All applicable palliative treatments associated with the Standard of Care, such as local RT, TURB, systemic anti-tumour treatments or other interventions/treatments applicable according to treating physician are allowed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause assessed up to a minimum of 36 months
From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause assessed up to a minimum of 36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease specific Survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of death by MIBC assessed up to a minimum of 36 months
From date of randomization until the date of death by MIBC assessed up to a minimum of 36 months
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to a minimum of 36 months
Any symptoms associated with tumor progression, including but not restricted to the AESI of the study.
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to a minimum of 36 months
Radiological progression-free survival
Time Frame: Time from randomization to the date of the first documented radiological progression or death, whichever comes first, assessed up to a minimum of 36 months
Defined as; 1. new lesion as compared to baseline and/or 2) increase of longest tumour diameter by 20% as assessed by local investigator.
Time from randomization to the date of the first documented radiological progression or death, whichever comes first, assessed up to a minimum of 36 months
Start of systemic anti-tumour treatment
Time Frame: Time from randomization to start of systemic anti-tumour treatment assessed up to a minimum of 36 months
Start of any systemic anti-tumour treatment, such as immunotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, chemotherapy or antibody-conjugates
Time from randomization to start of systemic anti-tumour treatment assessed up to a minimum of 36 months
Health related quality of life, HRQoL
Time Frame: Collected every fourth month throughout follow-up from randomization to 36 months of follow-up or until death of any cause, which ever comes first
Global HRQoL will be evaluated with the EORTC QLQ C15 PAL questionnaire (C15 PAL). Patients' responses to the QLQ questions will be scored and converted to a numeric scale 1-4, where 1=none and 4=very much, using the standard algorithms provided by EORTC
Collected every fourth month throughout follow-up from randomization to 36 months of follow-up or until death of any cause, which ever comes first
Patient reported outcome, PRO
Time Frame: Collected at every follow up (month 1, 2 and thereafter every 4th month from randomization) until last follow-up visit at 36 months or until death of any cause, which ever comes first

PRO will be evaluated using a study specific self-assessment questionnaire (PRO_GI-GU) based on the functional scale for urinary problems in patients without urostomy from EORTC QLQ - BLM30 (question 31-37) by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the functional scale for bowel bothers from the Prostate Cancer Symptom Scale (PCSS) question 21-35,50 (ver. 1, 2013) © Fransson & Widmark, Umeå, Sweden.

The patients' responses are converted to a numeric 0-10 scale, where 0 = none and 10 = very much, using the standard algorithms provided by EORTC and Fransson & Widmark(PMID:33444529).

Collected at every follow up (month 1, 2 and thereafter every 4th month from randomization) until last follow-up visit at 36 months or until death of any cause, which ever comes first
Early adverse events /late adverse event
Time Frame: Collected at every follow up (month 1, 2 and thereafter every 4th month from randomization) until last follow-up visit at 36 months or until death of any cause, which ever comes first
Differences between the arms in severity and frequency of reported early (within 90 days of EoRT) and late adverse events (after three months of EoRT) according to specified modules from CTCAE v5.0)
Collected at every follow up (month 1, 2 and thereafter every 4th month from randomization) until last follow-up visit at 36 months or until death of any cause, which ever comes first
Adverse event of special interest, AESI:
Time Frame: Collected throughout follow-up for a minimum of 36 months or until death of any cause, which ever comes first

Differences between the arms in reporting of symptoms associated with tumour progression, specifically:

Palliative RT Blood transfusion Surgical intervention due to local progression (TURB) Hospitalisation due to bladder tumour Urinary catheter placement (urinary, suprapubic, or nephrostomy)

Collected throughout follow-up for a minimum of 36 months or until death of any cause, which ever comes first

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exploratory: blood and tissue biomarkers
Time Frame: Collected at baseline, 4-week and 8 weeks of follow-up from randomization
The correlation of treatment (RT) outcome and blood and tissue biomarkers
Collected at baseline, 4-week and 8 weeks of follow-up from randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karin Söderkvist, MD, PhD, Umeå University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2032

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study collects sensitive health information and no compliant, consented mechanism for sharing individual-level data has been established for this randomized controlled trial.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer (BC)

Clinical Trials on Local hypo fractionated adaptive radiotherapy and Standard of Care

Subscribe