A Feasibility Study on an Advanced Rehabilitative Prototype of KNEE-LOCOBOT on Knee Osteoarthritis Patients

April 13, 2026 updated by: Ong Poo Lee, Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Problem: Total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries are increasing due to ageing populations. Current rehabilitation has a gap - patients do unsupervised exercises at home for 2-3 weeks between hospital discharge and outpatient appointments, leading to poor compliance and complications.

Current Issues: 25% of patients don't achieve meaningful functional improvement for 6+ months, and 20% still have significant limitations after 2 years.

Proposed Solution: Deploy a robot-aided device for intensive, self-paced home rehabilitation exercises to help patients return to near-normal function within 1 month.

Goals: Improve early functional recovery, increase exercise compliance, reduce costs, and enhance long-term quality of life for knee osteoarthritis patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Total knee replacement (TKR) has proven to be an effective treatment modality for end-stage kneeosteoarthritis (OA), relieving pain and improving patients' functional abilities. With an ageing and increasingly obese population, the number of people with end-stage osteoarthritis requiring TKR is expected to rise. In North America for example, conservative estimates suggest that the incidence rate of TKR is expected to increaseby 429 procedures/100,000 to 725/100,000 by 2050, a 143% projected increase in TKR volume. In 2019, more than 2,000 TKR surgeries were performed in Singapore General Hospital, and over800 TKR surgeries in Tan Tock Seng Hospital. With population aging and increasingly affluent lifestyle trends,these numbers expected to rise. Post-surgical rehabilitation contributes significantly to successful outcomes following knee replacement surgery. A systematic review reported patients receiving physiotherapy exercises had improved physical function and pain up to 6 months.

Current post-operative TKR care in TTSH includes a 4-day inpatient hospitalization stay with daily rehabilitation including early mobilization surgery day itself. Patients undergoing immediate inpatient post-TKR rehabilitation in TTSH had shorter inpatient stays and a higher discharge rate home. However, rehabilitation is far from complete, as immediate post-TKR rehabilitation phase has to be followed up by post-discharge exercises. Currently, TTSH outpatient TKR patients undergo 5 outpatient physiotherapy sessions over a 3 month period and machines include inpatient Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) and outpatient Motomed. As yet, no robotic aided devices have been employed for this population of patients. The transition from hospital to home has given rise to rehabilitation service gap whereby patients are mostly doing unsupervised self-directed exercises at home setting. Patient progress, exercises intensity and technique will be not supervised and corrected until they consult physiotherapist at outpatient clinic with could take up to 2-3 weeks later. Our local experience shows that there is a high level of poor post-operative exercise compliance, predisposing patients to complications of weakness, knee stiffness, scarring and pain, resulting in reduced long term function post-TKR. In fact, it has been demonstrated that 25% of patients fail to achieve minimum clinically important improvement in function for 6 or more months after TKR and 20% of them still report moderate to severe activity limitations 2 years after TKR. Several rehabilitation methods and modalities are available for patients received TKR, however optimal rehabilitation strategy and protocols have yet to be determined. Studies had demonstrated that continuous passive motion (CPM) and inpatient rehabilitation programme may not provide additional benefit to the patient or healthcare system. Rather, early rehabilitation, telerehabilitation, outpatient therapy and consistent, high intensity, high velocity exercise, maybe the vital components for successful rehabilitation for patient with TKR. For example, telerehabilitation has been reported to result in a statistically significant improvement in pain in addition to probable gains of functional mobility improvement in people following.

Our project aims to achieve early return in function to as near as normal, for patients within 1 month of knee OA through the deployment of robot-aided prototype device. This device will provide early self-paced intensive rehabilitation exercises on these group of patients at home with the long-term aim of minimizing future disability and better quality of life. Other secondary objectives of our study include improving exercise compliance, and rehabilitation cost saving among knee OA patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore
        • Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 21-80 years old,
  • Diagnosed to have knee osteoarthritis by clinician
  • Ability to understand and give consent
  • Premorbid Functional Ambulation Category of 6
  • Knee flexion ROM of at least 100 degrees
  • Ability to sit continuously for 60 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of co-existing neurological impairments causing lower limb weakness (e.g. stroke)
  • Medical conditions incompatible with research participation: uncontrolled medical illnesses (hypertension or diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, bronchial asthma, severe /untreated depression, agitation, end stage renal/liver/heart/lung failure, unresolved cancers.
  • Anticipated life expectancy of < 6 months
  • Local factors potentially worsened by intensive robot-aided arm therapy and computer-based training: recent limb fracture, knee pain VAS >4/10, fixed knee flexion contracture >10-degree, keen flexion range of motion <100 degree
  • Any musculoskeletal condition that may limit continuous exercise duration of 30minutes
  • Pregnant women
  • Recent knee operation within past 3 month

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Knee Locobot
Participant receive 4 weekly knee locobot training on the affected leg
During the session, participants will use the Knee-LOCOBOT machine for 45 minutes in clinic (including 5-10 mins of warm up and cool down).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change in quadricep strength from baseline to 1 month (unit: KgF)
Time Frame: 1 month
Mean change in quadriceps strength from baseline to 1 month using the dynamometer. There is no minimum or maximum value for quadriceps strength as it differs from person to person. A higher score mean a better outcome.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Oxford Knee Score from Baseline to 1 Month
Time Frame: 1 month
Mean change in Oxford Knee Score from baseline to 1 month, measured in Oxford Knee Score points using the validated Oxford Knee Score questionnaire. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 48. A higher score mean a better outcome.
1 month
Mean Change in Knee Society Score from Baseline to 1 Month
Time Frame: 1 month
Mean change in Knee Society Score from baseline to 1 month, measured in Knee Society Scal using the standardized Knee Society Score assessment (including knee and function subscales). For knee score, the grading scale is as such: A score of 80-100 indicates excellent, 70-79 is good, 60-69 is fair, and a score of below 60 indicates poor. A higher score mean a better outcome. For function score, the minimum score is -20, and maximum score is 100. A higher score mean a better outcome.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 23, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 19, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 19, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DSRB 2024-3529

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Knee Locobot

Subscribe