- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07550478
Impact of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Adult Oncology Outpatients
Impact of Pharmacist-Led Medication Reconciliation, Counseling and Follow-Up on Medication Adherence, Medication Errors and Medication-related Hospitalization in Adult Oncology Outpatients
Background and Rationale: Cancer patients receiving outpatient therapy often manage complex medication regimens that include anticancer agents, supportive care medications, and treatments for chronic comorbidities. This polypharmacy greatly increases the risk of medication discrepancies, potential drug-drug interactions, and unintentional errors. Moreover, because most oncology care is delivered in outpatient settings, patients are primarily responsible for self-administering their medications, making adherence a key determinant of treatment success and patient safety (Lindenmeyer et al., 2022; Alshehri et al., 2024). Medication errors and poor adherence among oncology patients are widely recognized global concerns. Research indicates that nearly half of cancer patients experience at least one medication discrepancy during transitions of care, and nonadherence to oral anticancer therapies can exceed 40%. Such issues can result in reduced treatment efficacy, increased toxicity, avoidable hospitalizations, higher healthcare costs, and poorer quality of life (Weingart et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2021). Pharmacists, as essential members of the multidisciplinary oncology team, are uniquely positioned to address these medication-related challenges. Their pharmacotherapy expertise and patient-education roles enable them to detect discrepancies, optimize medication use, and enhance patient understanding of treatment regimens. Evidence from various healthcare settings shows that pharmacist-led interventions such as medication reconciliation, individualized counseling, and structured follow-up can improve medication safety and adherence (de Clercq et al., 2021; Boeni et al., 2022). Despite strong evidence supporting each of these interventions individually, few studies have examined the combined effect of pharmacist-led reconciliation, counseling, and follow-up in outpatient oncology practice. Adult cancer patients face additional challenges, including complex dosing schedules, emotional distress, and financial burdens, all of which can impair medication adherence. An integrated pharmacist led program may create a continuous safety net that detects medication discrepancies early, reinforces correct use, and sustains adherence throughout treatment (Gellad et al., 2022; ISPOR Report, 2023). Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive pharmacist-led program encompassing medication reconciliation, individualized counseling, and systematic follow-up on enhancing medication adherence and reducing medication errors among adult outpatient cancer patients. Demonstrating the effectiveness of this integrated care model may provide strong evidence to support the routine inclusion of pharmacists in outpatient oncology services to improve patient outcomes and medication safety (Alshehri et al., 2024; Boeni et al., 2022).
Study Hypothesis: Adult oncology outpatients are frequently prescribed complex medication regimens upon leaving the hospital. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate whether a comprehensive pharmacist-led outpatient program improves medication adherence and reduces medication errors among this population.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• Adult medical oncology outpatient at NCI, Cairo University with different diagnoses.
- Receiving ≥5 medication
Exclusion criteria:
- Cognitive impairment,
- Palliative care
- Language barriers
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: PH-LED
Pharmacist led intervention
|
Medication Reconciliation, Counseling and Follow-Up
|
|
Active Comparator: ST- CARE
Standard care
|
Counselling
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
medication adherence
Time Frame: at baseline and after ONE MONTH
|
• To measure medication adherence score in both groups using the Morisky (MMAS-8) scale at baseline and after one month to assess improvement in adherence after the pharmacist-led intervention compared to usual care where 8 = High adherence, 6 to <8 = Medium adherence ,<6 = Low adherence |
at baseline and after ONE MONTH
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Detection of medication errors
Time Frame: Number of medication errors within ONE MONTH from baseline
|
• To identify and detect the number of medication errors in both groups
|
Number of medication errors within ONE MONTH from baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- References: Alshehri, M., Althumairi, A., Alharbi, K., & Alharbi, F. (2024). The impact of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation on patient safety outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Legal Medicine, 27(2), 87-95. Boeni, F., Spinatsch, M., Suter, K., Hersberger, K. E., & Arnet, I. (2022). Effectiveness of pharmacist-led counseling on medication adherence in cancer outpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, 28(5), 1123-1134. de Clercq, L., Van Camp, Y., De Winter, S., & Simoens, S. (2021). Pharmacist-led medication review and reconciliation in oncology: A scoping review. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 43(4), 929-940. Gellad, W. F., Zhao, X., Thorpe, C. T., & Donohue, J. M. (2022). Pharmacist interventions to improve medication use and safety in oncology outpatients. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1147. Hasen G, Negeso B. Patients Satisfaction with Pharmaceutical Care and Associated Factors in the Southwestern Ethiopia. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Sep 21;15:2155-2163. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S332489. PMID: 34584408; PMCID: PMC8464365 ISPOR Report. (2023). Pharmacist-led interventions to improve medication adherence in cancer patients: A systematic review. Value in Health, 26(Suppl 1), S123-S131. Joy AM, UP N, Chand S, Shetty JK, George SM, Chacko CS, Joel JJ. Role of clinical pharmacist in the medication adherence behaviour of cancer patients: An interventional study. Le Pharmacien Hospitalier et Clinicien. 2021; 56:291-297. Lindenmeyer, A., Oliveira, T., Santos, R., & Mendes, E. (2022). Medication discrepancies among oncology patients: The importance of pharmacist involvement. Journal of Hospital Pharmacy Services, 9(3), 55-63. Patel, J., Wong, A., & Clark, C. (2021). Medication errors and patient outcomes in ambulatory oncology. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 78(14), 1275-1282. Weingart, S. N., Brown, E., Bach, P. B., Engelhardt, K. E., Johnson, S
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HOSPITAL2601-511-149-206
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.