CCMR Two: A Phase IIa, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of the Ability of the Combination of Metformin and Clemastine to Promote Remyelination in People With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis Already on Disease-modifying Therapy

December 21, 2023 updated by: Nicholas Cunniffe, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

The greatest unmet need for people with multiple sclerosis is an effective therapy for the progressive phase. Current treatments suppress the damage caused by the immune system but there is only a limited window in which these can work. Consequently, much of the research community is turning its attention to the process of repair, called remyelination, in which the lining of nerve cells is reformed. This protects nerves from dying and therefore can delay, prevent, or even reverse, disability progression.

It has previously been shown that stem cells are already present in the brain that can carry out this process. Clemastine, an anti-histamine drug, can instruct them to become active and has already shown a beneficial effect in a phase 2 trial. Now, more recent experiments have shown that changes take place within these stem cells as they age, which prevents them responding to drugs like clemastine, but that this can be reversed by treatment with metformin, a commonly used anti-diabetes drug.

Our goal is to establish whether the combination of metformin and clemastine can promote remyelination in people with MS. We will focus on people with relapsing MS as they will have a greater proportion of nerves healthy enough to allow remyelination to take place, which will maximise the chance of detecting an effect with a smaller sample size.

Participants will also continue treatment with a current disease-modifying MS treatment, to reduce the chance of developing new areas of damage, allowing the trial to focus on the repair process. The treatment duration will be 24 weeks, but given the established safety of the proposed medications, we are able to limit the number of visits to the trial centre to ensure participation is not overly burdensome.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

23 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is willing and able to give written informed consent for participation in the trial;
  • Male or female, aged between 25 and 50 years (inclusive) at time of signing informed consent form (ICF);
  • Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis as per the McDonald 2017 criteria (Thompson et al., 2018), including an MRI brain satisfying the McDonald 2017 criteria;
  • VEP P100 latency in at least one eye of ≥118 ms;
  • Kurtzke EDSS 0.0-6.0;
  • At the time of screening being treated with a stable dose for at least 6 months of a category 1 multiple sclerosis DMT or for at least 2 years with a category 2 DMT;
  • Able (in the Investigator's opinion) and willing to comply with all trial requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female participants who are pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the trial;
  • Female participants of child-bearing potential whom are unwilling or unable to use one highly effective method of contraception during the trial (as outlined in section 11.11). For the purpose of this document, a woman is considered of childbearing potential, i.e. fertile, following menarche and until post-menopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilisation methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause;
  • Male participants who are unwilling or unable to use contraception during and for 3 months after the trial;
  • Participants whom have received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 4 weeks before the screening assessment or is currently enrolled in an interventional investigational trial;
  • Retinal nerve layer thickness on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) <70 μm in the qualifying eye;
  • A clinical episode of optic neuritis in the qualifying eye within the 2 years preceding screening;
  • Any unlicensed treatment of multiple sclerosis;
  • Any concomitant use of oxybutynin, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), hypnotics or high-dose opiates at screening;
  • Significant renal impairment (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2);
  • Screening liver function (alanine aminotransferase, ALT) value greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal;
  • Known hypersensitivity to metformin or clemastine (or other arylalkylamine antihistamines) or any of the excipients of these products;
  • People taking medication for Diabetes Mellitus at screening;
  • People with a diagnosis of epilepsy;
  • People with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption;
  • Concurrent use of 4-aminopyridine or fampridine;
  • Known contraindication(s) to MRI scanning procedures;
  • History of prostatic hypertrophy;
  • History of major ophthalmologic disease or concomitant ophthalmologic disorders including glaucoma, macular degeneration, and severe myopia (>-7 Diopters);
  • History of stenosing peptic ulcer or pyloroduodenal ulceration;
  • History of significant cardiac conduction block or decompensated heart failure;
  • History of acute porphyria;
  • People with a history of alcohol or other recreational drug misuse within the 6 months preceding screening;
  • People unable to avoid alcohol drinks for the course of the trial;
  • Vitamin B12 deficiency as defined as B12 levels of < 150 pg/ml measured at screening;
  • Any other significant disease, disability or investigation result which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participant at risk, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Research arm: metformin and clemastine

Metformin hydrochloride 500 mg prolonged release (SR) tablet for oral administration.

Clemastine hydrogen fumarate 1.34 mg tablet for oral administration.

Placebo Comparator: Control arm: placebos for both metformin + clemastine
Placebo tablets to match both metformin and clemastine tablets.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the change in the P100 latency of the full-field visual evoked potential (VEP) between baseline and week 26 for each affected eye of participants
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The change in MF-VEP latency, between baseline and week 26, for those eyes with delayed latency at baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26
The change in lesional MTR, between baseline and week 26, for the lesions stratified by location
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26
Adverse events and withdrawals attributable to metformin and/or clemastine
Time Frame: Baseline to week 28
Baseline to week 28
The change in lesional MTR between baseline and week 26, for the lesions stratified by tissue-specific cohort baseline lesional MTR values
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The change, between baseline and week 26, in the N75 and N145 latencies of the full-field VEP
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26
The change in full field VEP amplitude, between baseline and week 26, for those eyes with delayed latency at baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26
The change in MF-VEP amplitude, between baseline and week 26, for those eyes with delayed latency at baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26
The change in the number of letters read (and the corresponding LogMAR score) on the Sloan 100%, 2.5% and 1.25% acuity charts, between baseline and week 28
Time Frame: Baseline to week 28
Baseline to week 28
The change in colour vision between baseline and week 28
Time Frame: Baseline to week 28
Baseline to week 28
The change in visual fields between baseline and week 28
Time Frame: Baseline to week 28
Baseline to week 28
The change in saccadic latency parameters in the step, antisaccade and Wheeless tasks between screening and week 28
Time Frame: Screening to week 28
Screening to week 28
The change in retinal nerve fibre layer thickness between screening and week 28
Time Frame: Screening to week 28
Screening to week 28
The change in MRI T2 lesion load between baseline and week 26
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26
The change in EDSS between screening and week 26
Time Frame: Screening to week 26
Screening to week 26
The change in MTR of lesional subcomponents and lesional voxels, stratified by location, between baseline and week 26
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26
The change in lesional MTR between baseline and week 26, for different lesion types
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26
The change between baseline and week 26 measured by different MRI biomarkers of remyelination
Time Frame: Baseline to week 26
Baseline to week 26

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nick Cunniffe, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & University of Cambridge

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Metformin and clemastine in combination

3
Subscribe