Community Resiliency Collective Efficacy Intervention
Community Resiliency Collective Efficacy Intervention (CRCEI) til forebyggelse af samfundsvold - en klynge randomiseret kontrolleret undersøgelse
This study will evaluate, via a cluster-randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness of a community-centered intervention that promotes thriving and resiliency to reduce community violence.
Studieoversigt
Status
Status
Betingelser
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
This study will evaluate, via a cluster-randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness of an innovative community-centered intervention that promotes thriving and resiliency to reduce community violence. In collaboration with community partners, this study will implement a Community Resiliency Collective Efficacy Intervention (CRCEI) to engage community members in dialogue on neighborhood transformation, racial and gender equity, community leadership, and organizing for social change. Facilitating discussion and community organizing within neighborhoods about child and youth thriving is expected to increase individual and neighborhood levels of collective efficacy and reduce community violence. Using a community-partnered participatory approach, this study will use a Community Thriving Matrix tool to engage youth and adult community members in ongoing dialogue on neighborhood transformation, community leadership, and organizing for social change. This focus on envisioning and creating neighborhoods in which children and adolescents can thrive is expected to translate to increased individual and neighborhood levels of collective efficacy as well as violence reduction. Comparison neighborhoods will receive health education sessions as a control intervention. The proposed study involves diverse neighborhoods in the Pittsburgh region and collecting survey data from youth (ages 13-19 years) and adult community participants (both male and female identified). Interviews with a sub-sample of community residents and facilitators and community site leads as well as observations of intervention delivery will provide qualitative information on processes of program implementation. This study will provide the first rigorous evaluation of this community-level prevention approach.
Undersøgelsestype
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Anslået)
Tilmelding
Fase
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiesteder
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Forenede Stater, 15213
- University of Pittsburgh
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- youth age 13 years old and up (all genders)
- adults 18 years and older (all genders)
- reside in neighborhoods selected to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
-
individuals younger than 13 years old
- individuals residing outside of participating neighborhoods
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Forebyggelse
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Antal våben
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / ArmDeltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlingIntervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: Community Resiliency Collective Efficacy Intervention (CRCEI)
Community Resiliency Collective Efficacy Intervention (CRCEI) to engage community members in dialogue on thriving, community leadership, and organizing for social change (9 sessions). |
The Community Resiliency Collective Efficacy Intervention (CRCEI) will involve community members in dialogue on thriving, community leadership, and organizing for social change. Participants in the intervention condition will be asked to participate in 2 sessions of discussions about community thriving and a 7-week training program on the following topics: Building on the Strengths of Your Community, Collective Efficacy and its Effects on Violence Prevention & Community Mental Health, Non-threatening Peaceful Intervention Principles and Strategies: Part One, Non-threatening Peaceful Intervention Principles and Strategies: Part Two, Safety and Roles of Police and Community in Intervening, Active/Effective listening and non-violent communication skills, and Community Resources and Indirect Intervention. |
|
Aktiv komparator: Health Education Sessions
Comparison neighborhoods will receive health education sessions as a control intervention. (9 sessions) |
Comparison neighborhoods will receive health education sessions across a variety of community-identified health topics as a control intervention. (9 sessions) |
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in perceptions of neighborhood collective efficacy and community cohesion
Tidsramme: Change from baseline to approximately 12 months after baseline
|
Composite Measure mean score (range 1 - 5; 1 is low and 5 is best) of neighborhood-level perceptions of collective efficacy and community cohesion |
Change from baseline to approximately 12 months after baseline
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Community incidence of violence in 12 month period
Tidsramme: Change from 1 year period before baseline to approximately 12 months after baseline
|
number of incidents of violence, i.e., assaults, gun violence, referrals to child protective services, compared to control neighborhoods. |
Change from 1 year period before baseline to approximately 12 months after baseline
|
|
Community incidence of violence in 12 month period
Tidsramme: Change from 1 year period before baseline to approximately 2 years after baseline
|
number of incidents of violence, i.e., assaults, gun violence, referrals to child protective services, compared to control neighborhoods. |
Change from 1 year period before baseline to approximately 2 years after baseline
|
|
Change from baseline in collective efficacy and neighborhood social norms
Tidsramme: Change from baseline to approximately 12 months after baseline
|
Composite Collective Efficacy Measure mean score (range 1-5; 1 is lowest and 5 is best) of individual-level collective efficacy and neighborhood social norms |
Change from baseline to approximately 12 months after baseline
|
|
Number of self-reported events of violence exposure
Tidsramme: Change from baseline to approximately 12 months after baseline
|
count of individual-level events of violence exposure |
Change from baseline to approximately 12 months after baseline
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Sponsor
Samarbejdspartnere
Samarbejdspartnere
Efterforskere
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Alison Culyba, MD, PhD, MPH, University of Pittsburgh
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Studiestart
Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)
Primær færdiggørelse
Studieafslutning (Anslået)
Studieafslutning
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Først opslået
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering sendt
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- STUDY22100193
- U01CE003524-01 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
We do not plan to make a fully documented, publicly available data set on a website for download because while individual participant data are de-identified, it could be possible to discern the neighborhoods or sites from the dataset and therefore compromise the anonymity of the data. Therefore, we will make the data available only to selected researchers who apply for access. The application must document a legitimate public health use or research question for the data, and the applicant must sign a pledge to keep all data private and to make no attempt to identify individual subjects. This use of the data is consistent with the planned language of the voluntary consent for participation agreed and in accordance with IRB policy.
IPD-delingstidsramme
12 months after data collection is completed.
IPD-delingsadgangskriterier
Data sharing agreement must be completed with investigators and the University of Pittsburgh.
IPD-deling Understøttende informationstype
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .