Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Implementation of Evidence Based Practices for Colonoscopy: The Strategies to Improve Colonoscopy Study (STIC)

6. januar 2017 opdateret af: Rebecca Lobb, Washington University School of Medicine

Understanding Variability in Success of Quality Improvement for Colonoscopy

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of physician education about evidence based practices for colonoscopy alone, versus physician education plus a multi-component staff implementation strategy to improve adequacy of bowel preparation. Additionally the investigators will examine implementation factors that influence adoption of the evidence based practices.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Over 14 million colonoscopies are performed annually in the U.S. About 25% of patients that undergo colonoscopy have inadequate bowel preparation, an impediment to identifying cancer and pre-cancerous growths. The adenoma miss rate for patients with inadequate bowel preparation can be as high as 48%. The primary goal of the Strategies to Improve Colonoscopy (STIC) study is to conduct formative research on a multi-component implementation strategy to increase staff adoption of evidence-based practices (i.e. split-dosing of the medication, low-literacy materials, teach-back) for educating patients and improving the adequacy of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Investigators will compare the effect of physician education about evidence based practices for colonoscopy alone, versus education plus a staff implementation toolkit to improve quality of colonoscopy (i.e. adequacy of bowel preparation). Physicians in both study groups will receive education on the evidence-based practices. Staff who work for physicians in the initial intervention group will receive a multi-component implementation strategy for the evidence-based practices, consisting of staff education, a supply of low-literacy patient education materials for split-dosing the medication of their choice, poster and pocket-card with teach-back prompts, a consultation to integrate materials and teach-back into workflow, and a website with additional training and patient materials. The initial intervention period will be followed by a replication study where the delayed intervention group will receive the intervention.

Investigators will compare change in colonoscopy quality outcomes from before to after implementation of interventions for the two study groups: a) overall; and for b) Medicaid versus other insurance using administrative and medical record data with interrupted time series analysis. Investigators will also examine factors that influence adoption of the evidence based practices using structured physician, staff and patient surveys.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

46184

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physicians who perform colonoscopies at 6 participating endoscopy centers
  • Staff who work for participating physicians and provide education for bowel preparation before colonoscopy
  • Patients who had an outpatient colonoscopy at a participating endoscopy center during study period

Exclusion Criteria:

- none

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Initial Intervention
Staff will receive the intervention during the initial intervention period.
Staff will receive a multi-component implementation strategy for evidence based practices (EBPs) for colonoscopy, including split-dosing of bowel preparation, low literacy education materials for patients, and teach-back procedure. The implementation strategy includes a supply of low-literacy patient education materials for split-dosing the medication of their choice, poster and pocket-card with teach-back prompts, consultation to integrate materials and teach-back into workflow and a website with additional training and patient materials.
Eksperimentel: Delayed Intervention
Staff will receive the intervention during the replication study.
Staff will receive a multi-component implementation strategy for evidence based practices (EBPs) for colonoscopy, including split-dosing of bowel preparation, low literacy education materials for patients, and teach-back procedure. The implementation strategy includes a supply of low-literacy patient education materials for split-dosing the medication of their choice, poster and pocket-card with teach-back prompts, consultation to integrate materials and teach-back into workflow and a website with additional training and patient materials.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
Percent of patients with adequate of bowel preparation as indicated by a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score > 6 or an Aronchick scale score of fair or better.
Tidsramme: 5 month intervention period
5 month intervention period

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Adoption of Evidence Based Practices
Tidsramme: At baseline and after 5 month intervention period
Staff report of how frequently they use the EBPs and toolkit. 5 point likert scale from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always).
At baseline and after 5 month intervention period

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Rebecca Lobb, ScD, MPH, Washington University School of Medicine

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. maj 2013

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. maj 2016

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. december 2016

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

15. marts 2016

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

23. marts 2016

Først opslået (Skøn)

30. marts 2016

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)

10. januar 2017

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

6. januar 2017

Sidst verificeret

1. januar 2017

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 201401089
  • R21CA184282 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Staff multi-component implementation strategy

3
Abonner