Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Forbedring af resultater for ældre voksne, der gennemgår strålebehandling

21. september 2026 opdateret af: Kavita Dharmarajan, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Forbedring af resultater for ældre voksne, der gennemgår strålebehandling: Prospektiv kohorteundersøgelse

The purpose of this study is to improve healthcare received by people ≥ 65 years who are receiving radiation therapy (RT). The study will primarily examine patients ability to complete RT, changes in a patients' daily function and self-reported toxicities. To collect this information, study participants will be asked to complete surveys and physical and cognitive function assessments at five different timepoints in their treatment: before RT, End of RT, and at 1, 3, and 6 months follow up visits. Findings of this study will help radiation oncologists make more informed decisions for future patients receiving RT.

Studieoversigt

Status

Aktiv, ikke rekrutterende

Betingelser

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

150

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Forenede Stater
    • New York
      • New York, New York, Forenede Stater, 10029
        • One Gustave L Levy Place

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

65 år og ældre (Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

All participants presenting to Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Downtown, and Mount Sinai West who meet eligibility criteria will be given the option of participating. The hospitals serve distinct regions of New York City with diverse sociodemographic characteristics. All have RT services for ambulatory and hospitalized patients.

The total number of study enrollments at Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Downtown, and Mount Sinai West twill be approximately 225 over 36 months.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must be ≥ 65 years
  • Patient must have pathologically confirmed cancer
  • Patient must have the ability to provide informed consent, or have a legally authorized representative (LAR) present to provide informed consent on the participant's behalf
  • Must be radiation oncology patient at Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Downtown, or Mount Sinai West.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There is no exclusion criteria

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Observationsmodeller: COHORT
  • Tidsperspektiver: PROSPECTIVE

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Older Adults in Radiation Therapy

Older Adults who are receiving Radiation Therapy.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Completion of Radiation Treatment
Tidsramme: at end of RT, average of 10 days

The number of patients who have completed their radiation therapy (RT).
at end of RT, average of 10 days
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-30) Score Pre-RT
Tidsramme: pre-RT, time 0

EORTC-QLQ-30 Score consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions:

  • Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent).
  • Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
  • Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

All domain scores are calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.
pre-RT, time 0
EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at Post-RT
Tidsramme: at end of RT, average of 10 days

EORTC-QLQ-30 Score consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions:

  • Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent).
  • Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
  • Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

All domain scores are calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.
at end of RT, average of 10 days
EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 1 month follow-up
Tidsramme: at 1 month follow-up

EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 1 month follow up. EORTC-QLQ-30 Score consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions:

  • Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent).
  • Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
  • Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

All domain scores are calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.
at 1 month follow-up
EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 3 months follow up
Tidsramme: at 3 months follow-up

EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 3 months follow up. EORTC-QLQ-30 Score consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions:

  • Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent).
  • Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
  • Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

All domain scores are calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.
at 3 months follow-up
EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 6 months follow up
Tidsramme: at 6 months follow-up

EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 6 months follow up. EORTC-QLQ-30 Score consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions:

  • Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent).
  • Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
  • Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

All domain scores are calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.
at 6 months follow-up

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Short Physical Performance Battery Score at Pre-RT
Tidsramme: pre-RT, time 0

Physical performance pre-RT, measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a 10-minute provider-administered test of balance, 4-meter walk, and chair stands, which predicts disability and mortality in older adults and cancer patients. Each of the 3 tests are scored from 0-4 and summed for a total scale range of 0-12, with higher scores indicating better physical function.
pre-RT, time 0
Short Physical Performance Battery Score at at 1 month follow-up
Tidsramme: at 1 month follow-up

Physical performance at 1 month follow-up, measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a 10-minute provider-administered test of balance, 4-meter walk, and chair stands, which predicts disability and mortality in older adults and cancer patients. Each of the 3 tests are scored from 0-4 and summed for a total scale range of 0-12, with higher scores indicating better physical function.
at 1 month follow-up
Short Physical Performance Battery Score at 3 months follow-up
Tidsramme: at 3 months follow-up

Physical performance at 3 month follow-up, measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a 10-minute provider-administered test of balance, 4-meter walk, and chair stands, which predicts disability and mortality in older adults and cancer patients. Each of the 3 tests are scored from 0-4 and summed for a total scale range of 0-12, with higher scores indicating better physical function.
at 3 months follow-up
Short Physical Performance Battery Score at 6 months follow-up
Tidsramme: at 6 months follow-up

Physical performance at 6 months follow-up, measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a 10-minute provider-administered test of balance, 4-meter walk, and chair stands, which predicts disability and mortality in older adults and cancer patients. Each of the 3 tests are scored from 0-4 and summed for a total scale range of 0-12, with higher scores indicating better physical function.
at 6 months follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Score at Post-RT
Tidsramme: at end of RT, average of 10 days

Patient reported toxicity outcomes as measured using the PRO-CTCAE scale at post-RT. The PRO-CTCAE is a 5-minute survey, integrating patient perspectives into clinicians' reporting of treatment toxicity. It is validated for use in medical and radiation oncology and has revealed clinician underreporting of toxicity severity in older patients. The survey is scored on a 0-5-point scale, where higher outcomes indicate worse health outcomes.
at end of RT, average of 10 days
PRO-CTCAE Score at 1 month follow-up
Tidsramme: at 1 month follow-up

Patient reported toxicity outcomes as measured using the PRO-CTCAE scale at 1 month follow-up. The PRO-CTCAE is a 5-minute survey, integrating patient perspectives into clinicians' reporting of treatment toxicity. It is validated for use in medical and radiation oncology and has revealed clinician underreporting of toxicity severity in older patients. The survey is scored on a 0-5-point scale, where higher outcomes indicate worse health outcomes.
at 1 month follow-up
PRO-CTCAE Score at 3 months follow-up
Tidsramme: at 3 months follow-up

Patient reported toxicity outcomes as measured using the PRO-CTCAE scale at 3 months follow-up. The PRO-CTCAE is a 5-minute survey, integrating patient perspectives into clinicians' reporting of treatment toxicity. It is validated for use in medical and radiation oncology and has revealed clinician underreporting of toxicity severity in older patients. The survey is scored on a 0-5-point scale, where higher outcomes indicate worse health outcomes.
at 3 months follow-up
PRO-CTCAE Score at 6 months follow-up
Tidsramme: at 6 months follow-up

Patient reported toxicity outcomes as measured using the PRO-CTCAE scale at 6 months follow-up. The PRO-CTCAE is a 5-minute survey, integrating patient perspectives into clinicians' reporting of treatment toxicity. It is validated for use in medical and radiation oncology and has revealed clinician underreporting of toxicity severity in older patients. The survey is scored on a 0-5-point scale, where higher outcomes indicate worse health outcomes.
at 6 months follow-up

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Samarbejdspartnere

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Kavita Dharmarajan, MD, MSc, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

9. november 2022

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

31. december 2028

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

31. december 2028

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

31. januar 2023

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

31. januar 2023

Først opslået (Faktiske)

9. februar 2023

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

24. september 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

21. september 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. juli 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • GCO 19-2371
  • 1K76AG068516-01A1 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

IPD-planbeskrivelse

There is no plan to share IPD data.

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner