Эта страница была переведена автоматически, точность перевода не гарантируется. Пожалуйста, обратитесь к английской версии для исходного текста.

Улучшение результатов лечения пожилых людей, проходящих лучевую терапию

21 сентября 2026 г. обновлено: Kavita Dharmarajan, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Улучшение результатов лучевой терапии у пожилых людей: проспективное когортное исследование

The purpose of this study is to improve healthcare received by people ≥ 65 years who are receiving radiation therapy (RT). The study will primarily examine patients ability to complete RT, changes in a patients' daily function and self-reported toxicities. To collect this information, study participants will be asked to complete surveys and physical and cognitive function assessments at five different timepoints in their treatment: before RT, End of RT, and at 1, 3, and 6 months follow up visits. Findings of this study will help radiation oncologists make more informed decisions for future patients receiving RT.

Обзор исследования

Статус

Активный, не рекрутирующий

Условия

Тип исследования

Наблюдательный

Регистрация (Действительный)

150

Контакты и местонахождение

В этом разделе приведены контактные данные лиц, проводящих исследование, и информация о том, где проводится это исследование.

Места учебы

Критерии участия

Исследователи ищут людей, которые соответствуют определенному описанию, называемому критериям приемлемости. Некоторыми примерами этих критериев являются общее состояние здоровья человека или предшествующее лечение.

Критерии приемлемости

Возраст, подходящий для обучения

65 лет и старше (Пожилой взрослый)

Принимает здоровых добровольцев

Нет

Полы, имеющие право на обучение

Все

Метод выборки

Невероятностная выборка

Исследуемая популяция

All participants presenting to Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Downtown, and Mount Sinai West who meet eligibility criteria will be given the option of participating. The hospitals serve distinct regions of New York City with diverse sociodemographic characteristics. All have RT services for ambulatory and hospitalized patients.

The total number of study enrollments at Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Downtown, and Mount Sinai West twill be approximately 225 over 36 months.

Описание

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must be ≥ 65 years
  • Patient must have pathologically confirmed cancer
  • Patient must have the ability to provide informed consent, or have a legally authorized representative (LAR) present to provide informed consent on the participant's behalf
  • Must be radiation oncology patient at Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai Downtown, or Mount Sinai West.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There is no exclusion criteria

Учебный план

В этом разделе представлена ​​подробная информация о плане исследования, в том числе о том, как планируется исследование и что оно измеряет.

Как устроено исследование?

Детали дизайна

  • Наблюдательные модели: COHORT
  • Временные перспективы: PROSPECTIVE

Когорты и вмешательства

Группа / когорта
Older Adults in Radiation Therapy

Older Adults who are receiving Radiation Therapy.

Что измеряет исследование?

Первичные показатели результатов

Мера результата
Мера Описание
Временное ограничение
Completion of Radiation Treatment
Временное ограничение: at end of RT, average of 10 days

The number of patients who have completed their radiation therapy (RT).
at end of RT, average of 10 days
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-30) Score Pre-RT
Временное ограничение: pre-RT, time 0

EORTC-QLQ-30 Score consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions:

  • Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent).
  • Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
  • Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

All domain scores are calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.
pre-RT, time 0
EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at Post-RT
Временное ограничение: at end of RT, average of 10 days

EORTC-QLQ-30 Score consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions:

  • Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent).
  • Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
  • Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

All domain scores are calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.
at end of RT, average of 10 days
EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 1 month follow-up
Временное ограничение: at 1 month follow-up

EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 1 month follow up. EORTC-QLQ-30 Score consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions:

  • Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent).
  • Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
  • Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

All domain scores are calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.
at 1 month follow-up
EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 3 months follow up
Временное ограничение: at 3 months follow-up

EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 3 months follow up. EORTC-QLQ-30 Score consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions:

  • Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent).
  • Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
  • Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

All domain scores are calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.
at 3 months follow-up
EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 6 months follow up
Временное ограничение: at 6 months follow-up

EORTC-QLQ-30 Score at 6 months follow up. EORTC-QLQ-30 Score consists of 30 items covered by 1 of 3 dimensions:

  • Global health status/quality of life (2 items) with scores ranging from 1 (Very Poor) to 7 (Excellent).
  • Functional scales (15 total items addressing either physical, role, emotional, cognitive, or social functioning), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
  • Symptom scales (13 total items addressing either fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, or financial impact), each item scores ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).

All domain scores are calculated as an average of item scores and transformed to 0 to 100 score range. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.
at 6 months follow-up

Вторичные показатели результатов

Мера результата
Мера Описание
Временное ограничение
Short Physical Performance Battery Score at Pre-RT
Временное ограничение: pre-RT, time 0

Physical performance pre-RT, measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a 10-minute provider-administered test of balance, 4-meter walk, and chair stands, which predicts disability and mortality in older adults and cancer patients. Each of the 3 tests are scored from 0-4 and summed for a total scale range of 0-12, with higher scores indicating better physical function.
pre-RT, time 0
Short Physical Performance Battery Score at at 1 month follow-up
Временное ограничение: at 1 month follow-up

Physical performance at 1 month follow-up, measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a 10-minute provider-administered test of balance, 4-meter walk, and chair stands, which predicts disability and mortality in older adults and cancer patients. Each of the 3 tests are scored from 0-4 and summed for a total scale range of 0-12, with higher scores indicating better physical function.
at 1 month follow-up
Short Physical Performance Battery Score at 3 months follow-up
Временное ограничение: at 3 months follow-up

Physical performance at 3 month follow-up, measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a 10-minute provider-administered test of balance, 4-meter walk, and chair stands, which predicts disability and mortality in older adults and cancer patients. Each of the 3 tests are scored from 0-4 and summed for a total scale range of 0-12, with higher scores indicating better physical function.
at 3 months follow-up
Short Physical Performance Battery Score at 6 months follow-up
Временное ограничение: at 6 months follow-up

Physical performance at 6 months follow-up, measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a 10-minute provider-administered test of balance, 4-meter walk, and chair stands, which predicts disability and mortality in older adults and cancer patients. Each of the 3 tests are scored from 0-4 and summed for a total scale range of 0-12, with higher scores indicating better physical function.
at 6 months follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Score at Post-RT
Временное ограничение: at end of RT, average of 10 days

Patient reported toxicity outcomes as measured using the PRO-CTCAE scale at post-RT. The PRO-CTCAE is a 5-minute survey, integrating patient perspectives into clinicians' reporting of treatment toxicity. It is validated for use in medical and radiation oncology and has revealed clinician underreporting of toxicity severity in older patients. The survey is scored on a 0-5-point scale, where higher outcomes indicate worse health outcomes.
at end of RT, average of 10 days
PRO-CTCAE Score at 1 month follow-up
Временное ограничение: at 1 month follow-up

Patient reported toxicity outcomes as measured using the PRO-CTCAE scale at 1 month follow-up. The PRO-CTCAE is a 5-minute survey, integrating patient perspectives into clinicians' reporting of treatment toxicity. It is validated for use in medical and radiation oncology and has revealed clinician underreporting of toxicity severity in older patients. The survey is scored on a 0-5-point scale, where higher outcomes indicate worse health outcomes.
at 1 month follow-up
PRO-CTCAE Score at 3 months follow-up
Временное ограничение: at 3 months follow-up

Patient reported toxicity outcomes as measured using the PRO-CTCAE scale at 3 months follow-up. The PRO-CTCAE is a 5-minute survey, integrating patient perspectives into clinicians' reporting of treatment toxicity. It is validated for use in medical and radiation oncology and has revealed clinician underreporting of toxicity severity in older patients. The survey is scored on a 0-5-point scale, where higher outcomes indicate worse health outcomes.
at 3 months follow-up
PRO-CTCAE Score at 6 months follow-up
Временное ограничение: at 6 months follow-up

Patient reported toxicity outcomes as measured using the PRO-CTCAE scale at 6 months follow-up. The PRO-CTCAE is a 5-minute survey, integrating patient perspectives into clinicians' reporting of treatment toxicity. It is validated for use in medical and radiation oncology and has revealed clinician underreporting of toxicity severity in older patients. The survey is scored on a 0-5-point scale, where higher outcomes indicate worse health outcomes.
at 6 months follow-up

Соавторы и исследователи

Здесь вы найдете людей и организации, участвующие в этом исследовании.

Спонсор

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Соавторы

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Следователи

  • Главный следователь: Kavita Dharmarajan, MD, MSc, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Даты записи исследования

Эти даты отслеживают ход отправки отчетов об исследованиях и сводных результатов на сайт ClinicalTrials.gov. Записи исследований и сообщаемые результаты проверяются Национальной медицинской библиотекой (NLM), чтобы убедиться, что они соответствуют определенным стандартам контроля качества, прежде чем публиковать их на общедоступном веб-сайте.

Изучение основных дат

Начало исследования (Действительный)

9 ноября 2022 г.

Первичное завершение (Оцененный)

31 декабря 2028 г.

Завершение исследования (Оцененный)

31 декабря 2028 г.

Даты регистрации исследования

Первый отправленный

31 января 2023 г.

Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества

31 января 2023 г.

Первый опубликованный (Действительный)

9 февраля 2023 г.

Обновления учебных записей

Последнее опубликованное обновление (Действительный)

24 сентября 2026 г.

Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества

21 сентября 2026 г.

Последняя проверка

1 июля 2026 г.

Дополнительная информация

Термины, связанные с этим исследованием

Дополнительные соответствующие термины MeSH

Другие идентификационные номера исследования

  • GCO 19-2371
  • 1K76AG068516-01A1 (Грант/контракт NIH США)

Планирование данных отдельных участников (IPD)

Планируете делиться данными об отдельных участниках (IPD)?

НЕТ

Описание плана IPD

There is no plan to share IPD data.

Информация о лекарствах и устройствах, исследовательские документы

Изучает лекарственный продукт, регулируемый FDA США.

Нет

Изучает продукт устройства, регулируемый Управлением по санитарному надзору за качеством пищевых продуктов и медикаментов США.

Нет

продукт, произведенный в США и экспортированный из США.

Нет

Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .

Подписаться