Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Extension Block Pinning vs Conservative Treatment for Mallet Finger Fractures (PO-EBPT)

23. april 2026 opdateret af: Kemal Arda Çöl, Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Pin Orthosis Extension Block Pinning Versus Conservative Treatment for Doyle Type 4B Mallet Fractures

Mallet finger fractures are injuries affecting the tip of the finger and can be treated either with splinting or surgery. However, there is no clear agreement on which treatment provides better outcomes for certain types of these fractures.

In this study, patients with mallet finger fractures were randomly assigned to receive either surgical treatment using a pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique or conservative treatment with splint immobilization. Patients were followed at regular intervals, and outcomes such as finger movement, function, bone healing, and complications were evaluated over time.

The purpose of this study is to compare these two treatment approaches and determine which one leads to better clinical and functional outcomes.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Mallet finger fractures, particularly those involving a significant portion of the distal interphalangeal joint articular surface, present a therapeutic challenge, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy. Both conservative management with splinting and various surgical techniques have been described in the literature.

This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique and conventional conservative treatment in patients with mallet finger fractures. Patients were randomly assigned to either surgical or conservative treatment groups and followed at regular intervals.

Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed throughout the follow-up period to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of both treatment approaches."

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

62

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Sultangazi
      • Istanbul, Sultangazi, Tyrkiet (Türkiye), 34265
        • Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Acute mallet fracture (≤ 3 weeks from injury)
  • Fracture fragment involving 20-50% of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint articular surface

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open fractures
  • Chronic mallet fractures (> 3 weeks from injury)
  • Fracture fragment involving more than 50% of the DIP joint articular surface
  • Open physes
  • Inability to complete 12-month follow-up

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Surgical Treatment (PO-EBPT)
Participants in this group underwent surgical treatment using the pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique.
The pin-orthosis extension-block pinning technique was performed under appropriate anesthesia. A Kirschner wire was used to block extension at the distal interphalangeal joint and stabilize the fracture fragment, followed by immobilization with an orthosis. The fixation was maintained for a defined period, and patients were followed according to the study protocol.
Aktiv komparator: Conservative Treatment (Splinting)
Participants in this group received conservative treatment with splint immobilization of the distal interphalangeal joint.
Conservative treatment consisted of continuous splint immobilization of the distal interphalangeal joint in extension. Patients were instructed to maintain uninterrupted splint use for the recommended duration with regular follow-up visits to monitor compliance and clinical progress.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Distal Interphalangeal Joint Extension Lag
Tidsramme: 12 months
Degree of extension lag at the distal interphalangeal joint measured using a goniometer.
12 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Distal Interphalangeal Joint Range of Motion
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months (assessed at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months)
Range of motion of the distal interphalangeal joint measured in degrees.
Up to 12 months (assessed at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months)
Functional Outcome According to Crawford Criteria
Tidsramme: 12 months
Functional outcome assessed using the Crawford classification system.
12 months
Fracture Union
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months (assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months)
Radiographic evidence of fracture healing assessed during follow-up.
Up to 12 months (assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months)
Complication Rate
Tidsramme: Up to 12 months
Incidence of treatment-related complications observed during the study period.
Up to 12 months

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Kemal A Col, Doctor, Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

13. januar 2022

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

15. oktober 2024

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

15. oktober 2024

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

23. april 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

23. april 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

30. april 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

30. april 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

23. april 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. april 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy and institutional data protection policies.

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Mallet Finger Fracture

Abonner