- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT07717463
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block Study
Comparison of Preoperative Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Optimizing Spinal Anaesthesia in Proximal Femur Fracture Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Studieoversigt
Status
Betingelser
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Hip fractures are among the most common injuries in older adults and are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization. Spinal anesthesia is frequently used for surgical repair of proximal femur fractures because of its favorable safety profile in elderly patients. However, severe pain caused by the fracture often makes positioning for spinal anesthesia difficult, resulting in patient discomfort, prolonged procedure time, multiple needle insertion attempts, and increased procedural complexity.
Peripheral nerve blocks are increasingly used before spinal anesthesia to improve analgesia and facilitate patient positioning. The femoral nerve block (FNB) has long been established as an effective regional anesthesia technique for patients with hip fractures. More recently, the ultrasound-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block has been introduced as a motor-sparing technique targeting the articular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves that innervate the anterior hip capsule. Previous studies have demonstrated that the PENG block provides effective analgesia during positioning for spinal anesthesia and may offer superior pain relief compared with conventional techniques. However, evidence comparing the effects of PENG block and femoral nerve block on the technical performance of spinal anesthesia and perioperative hemodynamic stability remains limited.
This prospective, randomized controlled trial is designed to compare ultrasound-guided PENG block with ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block in patients undergoing surgery for proximal femur fracture under spinal anesthesia. The study will evaluate whether PENG block improves procedural conditions for spinal anesthesia compared with femoral nerve block while also assessing perioperative analgesia and hemodynamic responses.
The study hypothesis is that preoperative PENG block will provide better procedural conditions for spinal anesthesia than femoral nerve block by improving patient positioning, reducing pain during positioning, facilitating spinal needle placement, decreasing the need for supplemental analgesic or sedative medication, and contributing to greater perioperative hemodynamic stability.
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Anslået)
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Celal Kaya, MD
- Telefonnummer: 90 5435176760
- E-mail: c.kaya47@hotmail.com
Studiesteder
-
-
Beyoglu
-
Istanbul, Beyoglu, Tyrkiet (Türkiye)
- Taksim Training and Research Hospital
-
Kontakt:
- celal kaya, MD
- Telefonnummer: 90 5435176760
- E-mail: celalmadime@gmail.com
-
Kontakt:
- Guray Demir, Proffesor
- Telefonnummer: 90 5052113989
- E-mail: guraydemir@gmail.com
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 50 years or older.
- Diagnosis of proximal femoral fracture.
- Scheduled to undergo surgical repair under spinal anesthesia.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
- Able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent.
- Coagulopathy or contraindication to spinal anesthesia or peripheral nerve block.
- Local infection at the planned injection site.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics.
- Pre-existing neurological disease affecting lower extremity function or sensory assessment.
- Cognitive impairment preventing reliable study participation or outcome assessment.
- Previous lumbar spine surgery.
- Polytrauma.
- Body mass index (BMI) <18 kg/m² or >40 kg/m².
- Current anticoagulant therapy that precludes neuraxial anesthesia or peripheral nerve block according to institutional practice.
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Tredobbelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Aktiv komparator: PENG Block
Participants will receive a preoperative ultrasound-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine before spinal anesthesia for proximal femur fracture surgery.
Spinal anesthesia will subsequently be performed according to the standardized study protocol.
|
Ultrasound-guided PENG block performed before spinal anesthesia using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine to provide analgesia for patients undergoing surgery for proximal femur fracture.
Standard spinal anesthesia performed after the assigned peripheral nerve block using intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine according to the study protocol.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Femoral Nerve Block
Participants will receive a preoperative ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine before spinal anesthesia for proximal femur fracture surgery.
Spinal anesthesia will subsequently be performed according to the standardized study protocol.
|
Standard spinal anesthesia performed after the assigned peripheral nerve block using intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine according to the study protocol.
Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block performed before spinal anesthesia using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine to provide analgesia for patients undergoing surgery for proximal femur fracture.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Spinal Anesthesia Convenience Score (SACS)
Tidsramme: During spinal anesthesia procedure (immediately after patient positioning and before initiation of surgery)
|
Spinal anesthesia convenience will be assessed using the Spinal Anesthesia Convenience Score (SACS), a composite clinical score evaluating the ease of spinal anesthesia based on anatomical landmark palpation, patient cooperation, sitting position quality, pain during passive hip flexion, and pain while maintaining the sitting position.
Total scores range from 0 to 11, with higher scores indicating easier spinal anesthesia conditions.
|
During spinal anesthesia procedure (immediately after patient positioning and before initiation of surgery)
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
First-Attempt Success of Spinal Anesthesia
Tidsramme: During the spinal anesthesia procedure.
|
The proportion of participants in whom successful intrathecal access is achieved on the first needle insertion attempt.
|
During the spinal anesthesia procedure.
|
|
Number of Spinal Needle Insertion Attempts
Tidsramme: During the spinal anesthesia procedure.
|
The total number of spinal needle insertion attempts required to achieve successful spinal anesthesia.
|
During the spinal anesthesia procedure.
|
|
Duration of Spinal Anesthesia Procedure
Tidsramme: During the spinal anesthesia procedure.
|
Time from the beginning of patient positioning until completion of spinal anesthesia and return to the supine position, measured in minutes.
|
During the spinal anesthesia procedure.
|
|
Anxiety Score
Tidsramme: Before peripheral nerve block, 30 minutes after block placement, and immediately before surgical incision (after spinal anesthesia).
|
Patient anxiety will be assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no anxiety) to 10 (maximum anxiety).
Lower scores indicate less anxiety.
|
Before peripheral nerve block, 30 minutes after block placement, and immediately before surgical incision (after spinal anesthesia).
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Tidsramme: Postoperative Day 0 (before discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit [PACU])
|
Patient satisfaction with the anesthesia process will be assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (completely satisfied).
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
|
Postoperative Day 0 (before discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit [PACU])
|
|
Anesthesiologist Satisfaction
Tidsramme: Immediately after completion of spinal anesthesia.
|
The anesthesiologist's satisfaction with procedural conditions will be assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale ranging from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (completely satisfied).
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
|
Immediately after completion of spinal anesthesia.
|
|
Perioperative Hemodynamic Parameters
Tidsramme: Before peripheral nerve block; 1, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes after block placement; and 1, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia.
|
Mean arterial blood pressure will be recorded throughout the perioperative period.
|
Before peripheral nerve block; 1, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes after block placement; and 1, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia.
|
|
Incidence of Hypotension
Tidsramme: From spinal anesthesia until 30 minutes after surgery completed.
|
Hypotension is defined as a mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg.
The proportion of participants experiencing hypotension will be recorded.
|
From spinal anesthesia until 30 minutes after surgery completed.
|
|
Vasopressor Requirement
Tidsramme: From spinal anesthesia until 30 minutes after surgery completed.
|
Total intravenous ephedrine dose administered for the treatment of hypotension, measured in milligrams.
|
From spinal anesthesia until 30 minutes after surgery completed.
|
|
Additional Analgesic Medication Requirement
Tidsramme: During the spinal anesthesia procedure.
|
Total doses of intravenous fentanyl (micrograms) administered during positioning for spinal anesthesia.
|
During the spinal anesthesia procedure.
|
|
Additional Sedative Medication Requirement
Tidsramme: During the spinal anesthesia procedure.
|
Total doses of intravenous midazolam (milligrams) administered during positioning for spinal anesthesia.
|
During the spinal anesthesia procedure.
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Celal Kaya, Taksim Training and Research Hospital
Publikationer og nyttige links
Generelle publikationer
- Giron-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847.
- Messina A, La Via L, Milani A, Savi M, Calabro L, Sanfilippo F, Negri K, Castellani G, Cammarota G, Robba C, Morenghi E, Astuto M, Cecconi M. Spinal anesthesia and hypotensive events in hip fracture surgical repair in elderly patients: a meta-analysis. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022 May 8;2(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00047-6.
- Beaudoin FL, Nagdev A, Merchant RC, Becker BM. Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks in elderly patients with hip fractures. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;28(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.09.015.
- Erten E, Kara U, Simsek F, Eskin MB, Bilekli AB, Ocal N, Senkal S, Ozdemirkan I. Comparison of pericapsular nerve group block and femoral nerve block in spinal anesthesia position analgesia for proximal femoral fractures in geriatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Dec;29(12):1368-1375. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.33389.
- Lin DY, Brown B, Morrison C, Kroon HM, Jaarsma RL. Pericapsular nerve group block results in a longer analgesic effect and shorter time to discharge than femoral nerve block in patients after hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized trial. J Int Med Res. 2022 Mar;50(3):3000605221085073. doi: 10.1177/03000605221085073.
- Aygun H, Tulgar S, Yigit Y, Tasdemir A, Kurt C, Genc C, Bilgin S, Senoglu N, Koksal E. Effect of ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on pain during patient positioning for central nervous blockade in hip surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02245-3.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Anslået)
Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)
Studieafslutning (Anslået)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Nøgleord
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
- Sår og skader
- Benskader
- Brud, Knogle
- Lårbensbrud
- Hofteskader
- Hoftebrud
- Organiske kemikalier
- Anilider
- Amider
- Anilinforbindelser
- Aminer
- Anæstesi og analgesi
- Fordøjelsessystem og orale fysiologiske fænomener
- Anæstesi, ledning
- Anæstesi
- Tandlæge
- Dental fysiologiske fænomener
- Bupivacain
- Anæstesi, rygmarv
- Dental okklusion
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- E-48670771-514.99-317908988
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .
Kliniske forsøg med Hoftebrud
-
Zimmer BiometBiomet France SARLAfsluttetTotal Hip ResurfacingFrankrig
-
Ziv Medical CenterAfsluttetUoverensstemmelse i lemmerlængde | Total Hip
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephAktiv, ikke rekrutterendeErstatning, Total HipFrankrig
-
Nebojša TrajkovićAfsluttetSunde deltagere | Excentrisk træningstræning | Effekter af styrketræning | HIP -adduktionsstyrke | Styrkende øvelserSerbien
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephAfsluttetAcetabulær fraktur | Total HipFrankrig
-
Sahmyook UniversityAfsluttetHIP -funktionel begrænsning | Lumbal Spine Biomechanics | Lumbale muskelaktiveringKorea, Republikken
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliAfsluttetHip impingement syndrom | Prostetisk komplikationItalien
-
Al-Quds UniversityAfsluttetLyske Smerter | Lyskeskade | HIP -adduktionsstyrkePalæstinensisk territorium, besat
-
Restor3DAfsluttetKlinisk tilstand inkluderet i de godkendte indikationer til brug for Conformis Hip SystemForenede Stater
-
Revalesio CorporationTrukket tilbageHip Labral tåreForenede Stater
Kliniske forsøg med Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block
-
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research HospitalAfsluttetÆldre patienter | Regional anæstesi | Hoftebrud (ICD-10 72.01-72.2) | Postoperativ smertebehandling efter total hoftearthroplastikTyrkiet (Türkiye)
-
Balikesir UniversityAktiv, ikke rekrutterendeHoftebrud | Postoperativ kvalme og opkastning | Postoperative smerterTyrkiet (Türkiye)
-
Sherin RefaatAfsluttetSkulder artroskopisk kirurgiEgypten
-
Ain Shams UniversityIkke rekrutterer endnuSmertebehandling | Hoftebrud | Spinal anæstesi | Proksimal lårbensbrud
-
Sanliurfa Education and Research HospitalIkke rekrutterer endnuSleeve Gastrectomy | Ekstern skrå interkostal plan blok | Subcostal tværgående abdominis planblokTyrkiet (Türkiye)
-
Ospedale Edoardo BassiniRekrutteringRegional anæstesi morbiditet | Artropati af hofte | Opioidforbrug | Hofteartropati | Komplikation af anæstesi | Lokoregional anæstesi | Hospitalophold, opholdslængde på hospitalet fra operationstid indtil udskrivningItalien
-
Cairo UniversityUkendtPostoperativ smertebehandlingEgypten
-
Dalin Tzu Chi General HospitalFar Eastern Memorial HospitalAfsluttet
-
Zagazig UniversityAfsluttetPædiatrisk postoperativ smerteEgypten
-
Ain Shams UniversityRekrutteringHoftebrud | Postoperative smerterEgypten