Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Psychological Stress and Support Needs of Volunteer First Responders After Smartphone-based Cardiac Arrest Alerts (BRAVE)

21. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Mark Pitsch, University Hospital, Aachen

Burden and Resilience After Volunteer Engagement in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a serious emergency. In many areas, trained volunteers are alerted by a smartphone app to help before emergency services arrive. While this can save lives, these situations can also be emotionally stressful for the volunteers. This study looks at how these experiences affect volunteer first responders and how they cope with them. It also examines whether a structured follow-up conversation after an event can help reduce stress.

People who respond to a cardiac arrest alert can take part in the study. Participants will answer short questionnaires about their well-being about four weeks and ten weeks after the event. Some participants will also be offered a guided conversation to talk about their experience, while others will not.

The researchers will compare both groups to see if the conversation helps reduce stress over time. The study will also explore which factors may increase or reduce emotional burden.

Participants can stop answering the questionnaires at any time. If signs of increased stress are identified, support options are available. With consent, the study team may contact participants to offer further information and help connect them with support services.

The results of this study may help improve support for volunteer first responders in the future.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major cause of mortality worldwide. Early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders is a key determinant of survival. To improve response times, many regions have implemented smartphone-based alerting systems that notify nearby volunteer first responders of suspected cardiac arrest events.

While these systems have demonstrated clinical benefits, the psychological impact on volunteer responders is not yet fully understood. Responding to OHCA incidents may involve exposure to emotionally challenging situations, including unsuccessful resuscitation attempts or distressing scene conditions. At the same time, engagement in such life-saving efforts may also be associated with positive psychological effects, such as a sense of meaning or competence. A better understanding of both burden and resilience factors is needed to optimize support strategies for this population.

The BRAVE study (Burden and Resilience After Volunteer Engagement) is designed to investigate the psychological impact of smartphone-based OHCA alerts on volunteer first responders and to evaluate whether a structured post-event debriefing intervention can improve psychological outcomes.

Participants are recruited via the Corhelper smartphone application, which is routinely used to alert volunteer responders. After completing a routine post-event questionnaire, responders may indicate their interest in being contacted about study participation. Only individuals who provide explicit consent will be contacted by the study team and receive detailed study information.

The study follows a randomized controlled design. Participants are prospectively assigned to either an intervention group receiving a structured debriefing conversation or a control group without this intervention. The allocation ratio is approximately 1:2 due to resource constraints related to the delivery of the intervention.

The structured debriefing consists of a guided conversation conducted by a physician member of the study team, with the option to involve trained personnel from the psychosocial support (PSU) team. The conversation focuses on the reconstruction of the event, clarification of medical and situational aspects, and the individual processing of the experience. The intervention aims to support participants in understanding and coping with the event.

Psychological outcomes are assessed using standardized questionnaires at approximately four weeks (T1) and ten weeks (T2) after the event. Symptoms of post-traumatic stress are measured using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Personality traits are additionally assessed using the Big Five Inventory (BFI).

Exploratory analyses will additionally assess potential correlations between post-traumatic stress symptoms and individual or event-related factors. These may include prior medical background, previous resuscitation experience, pre-existing personal stress, personality traits measured by the BFI, time to arrival at the scene, resuscitation outcome, and the number of first responders present.

To ensure participant safety, a structured support pathway is implemented. Signs of increased psychological distress are identified based on questionnaire results and/or clinical impression during personal interactions. If indicated, participants may receive additional support, including further conversations with the study team, involvement of the PSU team, or referral to specialized mental health services in cooperation with the Alexianer Center for Mental Health. In the case of questionnaire-based assessments, participants may be contacted proactively by the study team if they have previously consented to such contact.

The study aims to generate evidence on the psychological effects of first responder systems and to evaluate the potential benefit of structured debriefing interventions. The results are expected to inform the development of targeted support strategies for volunteer first responders and contribute to the sustainable implementation of smartphone-based alerting systems.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

75

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

    • North Rhine-Westphalia
      • Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Deutschland, 52068
        • Aachen Institute for Rescue Management and Public Safety (ARS), RWTH Aachen University Hospital
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteer first responders alerted through the "Corhelper" smartphone application
  • Sufficient German language skills to understand the study information and to participate in the debriefing conversation and questionnaires
  • Written informed consent for study participation
  • Actual arrival at the scene with direct exposure to the resuscitation situation (e.g., visual contact with the patient or active participation in resuscitation measures)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below 18 years
  • Anticipated severe post-traumatic stress symptoms during the course of the study, in order to avoid possible retraumatization
  • Already enrolled in the study following a different Corhelper alert event

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Kein Eingriff: Control (No debriefing)
Participants in this group do not receive the structured debriefing intervention. They complete the scheduled follow-up questionnaires at predefined time points without additional structured support.
Experimental: Intervention (Structured debriefing)
Participants in this group receive a structured debriefing conversation conducted by a team including physician members of the study team and trained psychosocial support (PSU) personnel. The conversation focuses on reviewing the event, clarifying medical and situational aspects, and supporting the individual processing of the experience.
The intervention consists of a structured debriefing conversation conducted by a team including physician members of the study team and trained psychosocial support (PSU) personnel. The conversation follows a semi-structured format and includes a guided reconstruction of the event, clarification of medical and situational aspects, and support in the individual processing of the experience. The aim is to facilitate understanding, reduce uncertainty, and support coping with the event.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Post-traumatic stress symptom severity measured by the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) total score
Zeitfenster: 4 weeks after the event
Post-traumatic stress symptoms are assessed using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Total scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
4 weeks after the event

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in post-traumatic stress symptom severity measured by PCL-5 total score
Zeitfenster: From 4 weeks to 10 weeks after the event
Post-traumatic stress symptoms are assessed using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Total scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Change is calculated as the difference between the 10-week and 4-week scores.
From 4 weeks to 10 weeks after the event
Difference in post-traumatic stress symptom severity between debriefing and control groups
Zeitfenster: 4 weeks and 10 weeks after the event
PCL-5 total scores and changes in PCL-5 total scores are compared between participants assigned to the structured debriefing group and participants assigned to the control group.
4 weeks and 10 weeks after the event

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Mai 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Mai 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. November 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

8. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

21. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

26. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

26. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

21. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual participant data will not be shared due to the sensitive nature of the psychological and personal data collected in this study and the risk of participant re-identification despite pseudonymization.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Psychische Gesundheit

Klinische Studien zur Structured Debriefing

Abonnieren