Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Una breve intervención de tareas cognitivas para el personal del NHS afectado por el trauma de COVID-19 (estudio GAINS-2) (GAINS-2)

30 de abril de 2026 actualizado por: P1vital Products Limited

Un ensayo controlado aleatorizado de una intervención breve de tarea cognitiva para ayudar al personal del NHS a experimentar recuerdos intrusivos de eventos traumáticos del trabajo en la pandemia de COVID-19.

El personal de atención médica de primera línea está frecuentemente expuesto a eventos traumáticos en el trabajo (por ejemplo, presenciar la muerte de pacientes), amplificados por la pandemia de COVID-19. Una proporción significativa experimenta recuerdos intrusivos de estos eventos que aparecen repentinamente en la mente: pueden interrumpir el funcionamiento y pueden contribuir al trastorno de estrés postraumático. Investigaciones anteriores han demostrado que una breve intervención conductual puede reducir la cantidad de recuerdos intrusivos después de un evento traumático. En este estudio, probaremos el efecto de una tarea de competencia de imágenes digitales, una tarea de escuchar música digital y el tratamiento habitual (TAU) para el personal del Servicio Nacional de Salud (NHS) con recuerdos intrusivos de eventos traumáticos relacionados con el trabajo de la pandemia. Probamos el efecto sobre la cantidad de recuerdos intrusivos (resultado principal) y otros síntomas clínicos (TEPT, ansiedad, depresión e insomnio), además del funcionamiento laboral, el funcionamiento general y la calidad de vida (resultados secundarios). También se explorará la viabilidad, aceptabilidad e implementación de la intervención (resultados adicionales). Reclutaremos aproximadamente a 150 miembros del personal del NHS (a través de la Sociedad de Cuidados Intensivos, las redes sociales y la publicidad directa de NHS Trusts) con recuerdos intrusivos de eventos traumáticos experimentados durante la pandemia de COVID-19.

El estudio está financiado por Wellcome Trust (223016/Z/21/Z).

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Se preparará un plan de análisis estadístico antes del primer análisis intermedio utilizando análisis bayesianos para la inferencia estadística.

P1vital Products realizará un seguimiento periódico para verificar que el estudio se lleve a cabo y que los datos se generen, documenten e informen de conformidad con el protocolo, las BPC y los requisitos reglamentarios aplicables. Los representantes de control de calidad del patrocinador pueden realizar una auditoría del estudio de conformidad con las pautas reglamentarias y los procedimientos operativos estándar pertinentes.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

122

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Oxfordshire
      • Wallingford, Oxfordshire, Reino Unido, OX10 8BA
        • P1vital Products Ltd

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

14 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Criterios de inclusión:

  • 18 años o más.
  • Capaz de leer, escribir y hablar en inglés.
  • Trabajó en un rol clínico con pacientes con COVID-19 en el NHS durante la pandemia de COVID-19.
  • Experimentó al menos un evento traumático relacionado con su trabajo clínico durante la pandemia de COVID-9 que cumplió con el criterio A del Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales, 5ª edición (DSM-5) criterios para el Trastorno de Estrés Postraumático (TEPT): "exposición a la muerte real o amenazada, lesiones graves o violencia sexual" al "experimentar directamente los eventos traumáticos" o "presenciar, en persona, los eventos tal como les ocurrieron a otros".
  • Experimentar recuerdos intrusivos de los eventos traumáticos.
  • Experimentó al menos tres recuerdos intrusivos en la semana anterior a la proyección.
  • Tener acceso a Internet.
  • Dispuesto y capaz de dar su consentimiento informado y completar los procedimientos del estudio
  • Dispuesto y capaz de ser contactado por el equipo de investigación durante el período de estudio.
  • No haber participado en un estudio previo de esta intervención de este equipo de investigación.

Criterio de exclusión:

• Tener menos de tres recuerdos intrusivos durante la semana de preparación.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Breve tarea de competencia de imágenes digitales
Acceso a una breve tarea de competencia de imágenes digitales durante 24 semanas (las primeras 4 semanas con apoyo opcional del investigador).

Primera sesión guiada por un investigador: una pista de memoria seguida de un juego de computadora con instrucciones de rotación mental.

Opción de participar en sesiones autoadministradas/guiadas después de la primera sesión.

Experimental: Breve tarea de escuchar música digital
Acceso a una breve tarea de escucha de música digital durante 24 semanas (primeras 4 semanas con apoyo opcional del investigador).

Primera sesión guiada por un investigador: Información sobre la música del compositor seguida de la escucha de música clásica.

Opción de participar en sesiones autoadministradas/guiadas después de la primera sesión.

Experimental: Tratamiento como de costumbre
Acceso a la atención de rutina que los participantes recibirían si tuvieran recuerdos intrusivos de eventos traumáticos durante 24 semanas.
Acceso a la atención de rutina que los participantes recibirían si tuvieran recuerdos intrusivos de eventos traumáticos.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Number of Intrusive Memories of Traumatic Event(s)
Periodo de tiempo: Run-in/screening week, Week 4 (all arms)
Number of intrusive memories of traumatic event(s) recorded by participants in a brief daily online diary for 7 days.
Run-in/screening week, Week 4 (all arms)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Indicador de condición del sueño (SCI)
Periodo de tiempo: Valor inicial, 4 semanas, 12 semanas y 24 semanas (todos los brazos)
Esta escala de 2 ítems mide los problemas del sueño según los criterios del DSM-5 para el trastorno de insomnio. Cada una de las respuestas a los ítems se califica de 0 a 4, y las puntuaciones de 0 a 2 indican criterios umbrales para el trastorno de insomnio. La puntuación total oscila entre 0 y 8, y una puntuación más alta indica un mejor sueño.
Valor inicial, 4 semanas, 12 semanas y 24 semanas (todos los brazos)
Number of Intrusive Memories of Traumatic Event(s)
Periodo de tiempo: Run-in/Screening week, Weeks 12 and 24 (all arms)
Number of intrusive memories of traumatic event(s) recorded by participants in a brief daily online diary for 7 days.
Run-in/Screening week, Weeks 12 and 24 (all arms)
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
This 20-item measure assesses symptoms of PTSD over the last week. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"). Scores are summed to give a total severity score (ranging 0 to 80), with greater scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Generalised Anxiety Disorder 2-item Scale (GAD-2)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
This 2-item short-form self-report measure assesses symptoms of anxiety. Items are rated for how often they have bothered the respondent over the last two weeks, from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Total score is the sum of both items and ranges from 0 to 6, with greater scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Patient Health Questionnaire 2-item Version (PHQ-2)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
This 2-item short-form self-report measure assesses symptoms of depression. Items are rated for how often they have bothered the respondent over the last two weeks, from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Total score is the sum of both items and ranges from 0 to 6, with greater scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Scale of Work Engagement and Burnout (SWEBO) - Work Engagement Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
This 19-item self-report measure assesses work engagement and burnout. The work engagement subscale consists of 10 items assessing three dimensions (vigour, attentiveness, dedication). The burnout subscale consists of 9 items assessing three dimensions (exhaustion, disengagement and inattentiveness). Respondents rate how often they have felt each descriptive in the past two weeks, from 1 (not at all) to 4 (all the time). The work engagement subscale total score is calculated as a mean of items (range 1-4), with greater scores indicating greater work engagement.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Scale of Work Engagement and Burnout (SWEBO) - Work Burnout Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
This 19-item self-report measure assesses work engagement and burnout. The work engagement subscale consists of 10 items assessing three dimensions (vigour, attentiveness, dedication). The burnout subscale consists of 9 items assessing three dimensions (exhaustion, disengagement and inattentiveness). Respondents rate how often they have felt each descriptive in the past two weeks, from 1 (not at all) to 4 (all the time). The work burnout subscale total score is calculated as a mean of items (range 1-4), with greater scores indicating greater work burnout.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Sickness Absence
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Single item assessing self-reported number of sick days taken from work in the last 4 weeks.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Intention to Leave Job
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
3 items assess participants' intention to leave their job e.g. "I think a lot about leaving the job", each rated from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). The total score ranges 3 to 15, with a lower score indicating stronger intention to leave the job.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
5-level European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L), Mobility
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
The 5-level version of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) is a brief, five-item measure for assessing general quality of life and health status. Items assess mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression each on a 5-point scale. The mobility item is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale from "I have no problems in walking about" to "I am unable to walk about".
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
5-level European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L), Self Care
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
The 5-level version of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) is a brief, five-item measure for assessing general quality of life and health status. Items assess mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression each on a 5-point scale. The self care item is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale from "I have no problems washing or dressing myself" to "I am unable to wash or dress myself".
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
5-level European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L), Usual Activities
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
The 5-level version of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) is a brief, five-item measure for assessing general quality of life and health status. Items assess mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression each on a 5-point scale. The usual activities item is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale from "I have no problems doing my usual activities" to "I am unable to do my usual activities".
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
5-level European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L), Pain / Discomfort
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
The 5-level version of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) is a brief, five-item measure for assessing general quality of life and health status. Items assess mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression each on a 5-point scale. The pain / discomfort item is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale from "I have no pain or discomfort" to "I have extreme pain or discomfort".
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
5-level European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L), Anxiety / Depression
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
The 5-level version of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) is a brief, five-item measure for assessing general quality of life and health status. Items assess mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression each on a 5-point scale. The anxiety / depression item is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale from "I am not anxious or depressed" to "I am extremely anxious or depressed".
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
5-level European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L), Overall Health
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
The 5-level version of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) is a brief measure for assessing general quality of life and health status. Respondents rate their overall health today on a visual analogue scale from 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine).
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 12-item Version (WHODAS 2.0)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
The 12-item, self-report version of the WHODAS 2.0 will be used to assess difficulties in relation to the impact of intrusive memories. Respondents rate how much difficulty they have had in each area in the past 30 days, from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme or cannot do). The overall score is calculated as a percentage of the maximum possible score (i.e., 48 points), with greater scores indicating greater impairment.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Intrusive Memory Ratings: Item 1. Approximately How Often Did Intrusive Memories of the Traumatic Event Pop Into Your Mind?
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)

This questionnaire assesses a number of intrusive memories characteristics, including frequency (Item 1: 7-point categorical response from 'never' to 'many times a day'); distress (Item 2: 0=not at all to 10=extremely); disruption to concentration (Item 3: 0=not at all to 10=extremely); interference (Item 4: how much (0=not at all to 10=extremely), and Item 4a: for how long (6-point response from '<1min' to '>60mins')); impact on work functioning (Item 5: how much (0=not at all to 10=extremely) and Item 6: in what ways (open text response)); impact on functioning in other areas of life (Item 7: how much (0=not at all to 10=extremely) and in what ways (Item 8: open text response)).

Here we present Item 1 assessing the frequency of intrusive memories on a 7-point scale from 'never' to 'many times a day'. Other items from this questionnaire are presented below.

Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Intrusive Memory Ratings: Item 4a. Duration of Interference
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24 (all arms)

This questionnaire assesses a number of intrusive memories characteristics, including frequency (Item 1: 7-point categorical response from 'never' to 'many times a day'); distress (Item 2: 0=not at all to 10=extremely); disruption to concentration (Item 3: 0=not at all to 10=extremely); interference (Item 4: how much (0=not at all to 10=extremely), and Item 4a: for how long (6-point response from '<1min' to '>60mins')); impact on work functioning (Item 5: how much (0=not at all to 10=extremely) and Item 6: in what ways (open text response)); impact on functioning in other areas of life (Item 7: how much (0=not at all to 10=extremely) and in what ways (Item 8: open text response)).

Here we present Item 4a assessing the for how long intrusive memories interfered with what participants were doing on a 7-point scale from '<1 min' to '>60 mins'. Other items from this questionnaire are presented below.

Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24 (all arms)
Intrusive Memory Ratings: Distress (Item 2), Disruption to Concentration (Item 3), Interference (Item 4), Impact on Work Functioning (Item 5), and Impact on Functioning in Other Areas of Life (Item 7)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24 (all arms)

This questionnaire assesses a number of intrusive memories characteristics, including frequency (Item 1: 7-point categorical response from 'never' to 'many times a day'); distress (Item 2: 0=not at all to 10=extremely); disruption to concentration (Item 3: 0=not at all to 10=extremely); interference (Item 4: how much (0=not at all to 10=extremely), and Item 4a: for how long (6-point response from '<1min' to '>60mins')); impact on work functioning (Item 5: how much (0=not at all to 10=extremely) and Item 6: in what ways (open text response)); impact on functioning in other areas of life (Item 7: how much (0=not at all to 10=extremely) and in what ways (Item 8: open text response)).

Here we present data for the five items scored on an 11-point scale (0=not at all to 10=extremely) assessing distress (Item 2), disruption to concentration (Item 3), interference (Item 4), impact on work functioning (Item 5), and impact on functioning in other areas of life (Item 7).

Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24 (all arms)

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Changes to Health and Work - Dichotomous Outcomes
Periodo de tiempo: 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
The 9-item questionnaire will be used to assess the occurrence and number of any new traumatic events, any additional stressful life events (e.g. relationship problems, financial problems), new treatments received, untoward medical occurrences, changes to the job, or changes to the number of hours worked per week since the last assessment. Dichotomous outcomes are presented below, and discrete outcomes with count data are presented under "Changes to health and work - discrete outcomes".
4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Changes to Health and Work - Discrete Outcomes
Periodo de tiempo: 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
The 9-item questionnaire will be used to assess the occurrence and number of any new traumatic events, any additional stressful life events (e.g. relationship problems, financial problems), new treatments received, untoward medical occurrences, changes to the job, or changes to the number of hours worked per week since the last assessment. Discrete outcomes are presented below, and dichotomous outcomes are presented under "Changes to health and work - dichotomous outcomes".
4 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks (all arms)
Feedback Questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: After 4 weeks (brief imagery-competing task and brief music listening task arms only)
A 12-item questionnaire assessing participants' experience of using the brief cognitive task. The first ten items assess how easy, helpful, distressing, burdensome and acceptable participants found the brief cognitive task, how willing they would be to use it in the future, how confident they would be in recommending it to a friend and how much they feel it could be used to support staff within the NHS, each rated from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very). The last two items ask how the brief cognitive task could be improved, and for any other comments or suggestions about the brief cogntive task, both with an open response.
After 4 weeks (brief imagery-competing task and brief music listening task arms only)
Feedback Questionnaire (Total Score)
Periodo de tiempo: After 4 weeks (brief imagery-competing task and brief music listening task arms only)
A 12-item questionnaire assessing participants' experience of using the brief cognitive task. The first ten items assess how easy, helpful, distressing, burdensome and acceptable participants found the brief cognitive task, how willing they would be to use it in the future, how confident they would be in recommending it to a friend and how much they feel it could be used to support staff within the NHS, each rated from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very); items for distress and burden are reverse scored from 0 (very) to 10 (not at all). The last two items ask how the brief cognitive task could be improved, and for any other comments or suggestions about the brief cognitive task, both with an open response. A total score of the eight categorical items is presented (range 0 - 80), with greater scores indicating more favourable feedback towards the allocated digital task.
After 4 weeks (brief imagery-competing task and brief music listening task arms only)
Optional Qualitative Interview
Periodo de tiempo: Week 4 and Week 24 (brief imagery competing task and brief music listening task arms only)
This semi-structured interview will consist of a number of questions designed to gain an in-depth understanding of participants' experience of using the brief cognitive task, including acceptability, improvement suggestions, and potential barriers/facilitators to implementation.
Week 4 and Week 24 (brief imagery competing task and brief music listening task arms only)
Weekly Work Pattern, Number of Days Worked
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
One item asses the number of days worked in the last week (both with responses from 0 to 7 days).
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
Weekly Work Pattern, Number of Night Shifts Worked
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
One item asses the number of night shifts worked in the last week (both with responses from 0 to 7).
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Week 24
Expectancy of Intervention Effect (Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire, CEQ) - Categorical Items
Periodo de tiempo: Day 0 (post-randomisation)
The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) consists of 6 items. Items 1, 2, 3, and 5 were assessed on a 9-point integer scale ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 9 ("very"). Items 4 and 6 were assessed on an 11-point scale (response range of 0-100%) and, for comparability, were converted to the same 9-point scale as other items. CEQ total score was calculated by summing all six items producing a possible total score range of 6-54; with greater scores indicating greater credibility and expectancy of intervention effect. Participants completed the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) after being informed of treatment allocation (Day 0).
Day 0 (post-randomisation)
Expectancy of Intervention Effect (Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire, CEQ) - Total Score
Periodo de tiempo: Day 0 (post-randomisation)
The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) consists of 6 items. Items 1, 2, 3, and 5 were assessed on a 9-point integer scale ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 9 ("very"). Items 4 and 6 were assessed on an 11-point scale (response range of 0-100%) and, for comparability, were converted to the same 9-point scale as other items. CEQ total score was calculated by summing all six items producing a possible total score range of 6-54; with greater scores indicating greater credibility and expectancy of intervention effect. Participants completed the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) after being informed of treatment allocation (Day 0).
Day 0 (post-randomisation)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Director de estudio: Emily Holmes, Uppsala University (UU), Sweden
  • Investigador principal: Amy Beckenstrom, P1vital Products, Wallingford

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

8 de diciembre de 2022

Finalización primaria (Actual)

30 de octubre de 2023

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

19 de marzo de 2024

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

11 de noviembre de 2022

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

11 de noviembre de 2022

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

15 de noviembre de 2022

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

27 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

30 de abril de 2026

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • P1V-GAINS-IN02

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

Una base de datos anonimizada de datos de participantes individuales, junto con un diccionario de datos, se compartirá en Open Science Framework.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Nuestro objetivo es compartir el Protocolo de estudio y el Plan de análisis estadístico cuando el último participante complete la última visita. La información de apoyo mencionada anteriormente se compartirá indefinidamente y sin fecha de finalización en la plataforma Open Science Framework (OSF). Los resultados del estudio se compartirán a través de publicaciones de acceso abierto.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Los datos de investigación anónimos estarán disponibles en el OSF de forma indefinida.

OSF es una aplicación web de código abierto de libre acceso para el público y la comunidad científica.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA
  • CÓDIGO_ANALÍTICO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir