Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Punto óptimo para la monitorización del ritmo cardíaco después de un ACV (STARGATE)

15 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: Luciano A. Sposato

Ensayo piloto de STARGATE (Punto dulce para la monitorización del ritmo cardíaco después de un ACV): un ensayo controlado aleatorizado de factibilidad piloto

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of long-term vs. shorter-term heart monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation after stroke.

Patients will be implanted with a loop recorder and will have study follow-up at 3-, 6- an 12-months after implantation.

The investigators will evaluate 24 patients, between the 3 centers, in the same way the investigators plan to evaluate a larger number of participants (>1000) in a future study. This will allow us to learn if such a study is possible, identify potential implementation challenges, and develop strategies to overcome those difficulties.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder. Its name comes from the fibrillation (i.e. quivering) of the two upper chambers (atria) of the heart instead of a coordinated contraction, causing a rapid, irregular heart rate. This irregular contraction is ineffective, leading to the development clots in the heart. These clots can travel through the bloodstream until they get stuck in a brain artery. Millions of brain cells that depend on the oxygen supplied by the blocked artery die within minutes. This is known as a stroke. Strong blood thinners known as anticoagulants can lower stroke risk by 64% in AF patients when the AF is detected on an electrocardiogram (ECG) or if it lasts more than 24h on a heart monitor. Therefore, doctors use cardiac monitors to record the heartbeats of stroke patients for up to 3 years. It was historically thought, but not proven, that if AF was found in stroke patients, using anticoagulants could prevent a second stroke. However, recent information suggests that using cardiac monitors in stroke patients increases AF detection and anticoagulants prescription without a reduction in the number of new strokes. The failure to prevent a second stroke is likely the consequence of cardiac monitors sometimes detecting very short-duration AFs, which may have a low risk of stroke. If AFs last only for a few minutes or hours, anticoagulants may not be needed.

Patients with a stroke and not know atrial fibrillation will be implanted with a loop recorder and randomized in two groups (disclosure arm and non-disclosure arm). Patients will have phone follow-up visits at 3, 6 and 12 months after implantation. A quality-of-life survey will be performed at the last study visit.

This study will assess if it is possible to organize a large clinical trial comparing the use of long-term vs. shorter-term heart monitoring. The investigators will evaluate 24 patients, between the 3 centers, in the same way, the investigators plan to evaluate a larger number of participants (>1000) in a future study. This will allow us to learn if such a study is possible, identify potential implementation challenges, and develop strategies to overcome those difficulties.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Fase

  • No aplica

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

- Adult patients with cortical or subcortical, cryptogenic or non-cryptogenic acute ischemic stroke

Exclusion Criteria:

  • AF on 24-h inpatient or Holter monitoring
  • Atrial or ventricular thrombus
  • Other major-risk cardioembolic sources (e.g., mechanical valve)
  • Other indications (e.g., venous thromboembolism) or contraindications for OACs.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Prevención
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Disclosure

Group A (disclosure arm): patients and physicians will be informed about all AF episodes identified on ILR lasting for ≥6 minutes.

Patients will be implanted with a loop recorder. Patients will be given the choice of remove the loop recorder after the 12-months follow-up visit or at the end of its battery life (approximately 3 years)

A quality of life survey will be performed at the end of the follow-up period. The survey will be done over the phone or in person if the follow-up visit is in person.

Comparador activo: Non-Disclosure

Group B (non-disclosure arm): patients and physicians will be only informed about AF episodes identified on ILR lasting for ≥24h. This longer threshold is selected because of its association with increased risk of systemic embolism.

Patients will be implanted with a loop recorder. Patients will be given the choice of remove the loop recorder after the 12-months follow-up visit or at the end of its battery life (approximately 3 years)

A quality of life survey will be performed at the end of the follow-up period. The survey will be done over the phone or in person if the follow-up visit is in person.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Number of patients enrolled at in 6 months
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months

Median and interquartile range recruitment rate. We will use this rate to estimate the number of sites and enrollment duration required for a larger RCT.

6 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Screened, declined and dropouts.
Periodo de tiempo: 2 years
  1. proportion and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of stroke patients needed to screen per patient invited to participate
  2. proportion and 95% CI of patients declining participation
  3. proportion and 95% CI of dropouts at the end of follow-up.
2 years
Number of clinical endpoint events per diagnostic arm
Periodo de tiempo: 2 years

The investigators will apply standard descriptive statistics to report the number of clinical endpoint events per diagnostic arm. The primary composite efficacy endpoint to be used in larger RCT is stroke recurrence (ischemic or hemorrhagic), systemic embolism, MACE (myocardial infarction and admission for decompensated AF or heart failure), and death. The primary safety endpoint will be major bleeding (ISTH definition).These data and results from prior studies will be used to estimate the final sample size and required number of sites for the larger RCT.

2 years
Quality of life survey analysis
Periodo de tiempo: 2 years

The investigators will perform a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the results of the ILR-specific quality of life survey. The analysis will be reviewed by the team and PWLE. We will use this information to improve patients' experiences in a larger RCT

2 years
AF timing of diagnosis
Periodo de tiempo: 2 years

The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF timing of diagnosis :Time to first AF diagnosis (DD:HH)

2 years
AF burden (1)
Periodo de tiempo: 2 years

The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF burden:

Total AF burden at 3, 6, and 12 months post-ILR insertion (sum of the duration of all AF episodes, HH:MM:SS).

Characterizing these measures will allow us to choose the best AF burden definition for a larger RCT.

2 years
AF burden (2)
Periodo de tiempo: 2 years

The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF burden:

Maximum duration of the longest AF episode. Characterizing these measures will allow us to choose the best AF burden definition for a larger RCT.

2 years
AF burden (3)
Periodo de tiempo: 2 years

The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF burden:

Relative AF burden (total AF burden/net monitoring time), (4) AF Pattern (number of AF episodes and time of occurrence), (5) Other ECG monitoring findings (premature atrial complexes, interatrial block, etc.). Characterizing these measures will allow us to choose the best AF burden definition for a larger RCT.

2 years
AF burden (4)
Periodo de tiempo: 2 years

The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF burden:

AF Pattern (number of AF episodes and time of occurrence). Characterizing these measures will allow us to choose the best AF burden definition for a larger RCT.

2 years
AF burden (5)
Periodo de tiempo: 2 years

The investigators will evaluate different measures of AF burden:

Other ECG monitoring findings (premature atrial complexes, interatrial block, etc.). Characterizing these measures will allow us to choose the best AF burden definition for a larger RCT.

2 years

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Luciano A Sposato, MD, MBA, LHSC - Western University

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de noviembre de 2023

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de octubre de 2024

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de febrero de 2025

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

13 de enero de 2023

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de febrero de 2023

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

8 de febrero de 2023

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

18 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir