- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT00223808
Assisted Movement Neuro-rehabilitation: VA Multi-site Clinical Trial
3 janvier 2014 mis à jour par: US Department of Veterans Affairs
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a lower-dose and higher-dose therapy program for persons recovering from a recent stroke using mechanically-assisted upper limb movement with a device called MIME.
A control group receives additional occupational therapy without the use of MIME.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
This study continues our investigation of the optimal timing, intensity, and duration of robot-assisted training to improve motor performance in patients with hemiplegia following stroke.
These hypotheses will be tested: 1) subjects receiving robot-assisted upper limb therapy with MIME in the initial phase of recovery from stroke experience greater functional gains than a control group receiving additional conventional therapy of equal intensity and duration, 2) robot-assisted therapy results in a dose-dependent response, and 3) robot-assisted therapy promotes greater control of movement, greater recovery of strength, and greater reduction of co-contraction than the control intervention.
Research Plan - A multi-site clinical trial is in progress at the Houston VA Medical Center (VAMC), the VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System (GLAHCS), the VA Palo Alto Rehabilitation Research and Development Center (RR&DC), and the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System (CTVHCS).
CTVHCS serves as the coordinating site.
The RR&DC provides training and technical assistance for the other sites.
Methods - Subjects with hemiparesis due to a stroke are randomly assigned to 3 groups.
Group 1 receives 1 hour/day of robot-assisted upper limb therapy in addition to usual physical and occupational therapy.
Group 2 receives a total of 2 hours/day of robot-assisted therapy.
Group 3 receives 1 hour/day of additional upper limb therapy that includes exposure to, but no manipulation by the robot.
Outcome measures include assessment of strength, motor control, functional status, and patient satisfaction at intake, discharge, 6 and 12 months.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
71
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
California
-
Palo Alto, California, États-Unis, 94304-1290
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System
-
West Los Angeles, California, États-Unis, 90073
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, États-Unis, 77030
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)
-
Temple, Texas, États-Unis, 76504
- Central Texas Veterans Health Care System
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
21 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Non
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Over 21 years of age, weakness due to a recent stroke or other brain injury, and receiving rehabilitation. Subjects are inpatients at one of the participating VA hospitals.
Exclusion Criteria:
Unable to follow instructions; medically unstable.
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Double
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
---|---|
Expérimental: Robot-Low
low-dose mechanically-assisted upper limb therapy
|
1 hour/day of robot-assisted upper limb exercise therapy in addition to usual physical and occupational therapy
|
Expérimental: Robot-High
high-dose mechanically-assisted upper limb therapy
|
2 hours/day of robot-assisted therapy in addition to usual physical and occupational therapy
|
Comparateur actif: Control
additional traditional therapy
|
1 hour/day of additional upper limb therapy that includes exposure to, but no manipulation by the robot
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
---|---|---|
Fugl-Meyer Score Change Immediately Following Study Intervention.
Délai: After study intervention (on completion of the maximum planned number of sessions for their group or discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, whichever came first) compared to baseline at study enrollment between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.
|
Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score.
The FMA evaluates motor function, sensation, balance, and joint function in hemiplegic patients and provides a cumulative numerical score.
It is widely used to evaluate changes in function over time in clinical care and therapeutic trials following stroke.
Five domains can be assessed, including motor function (upper and lower limbs); sensory function; balance; joint range of motion; and joint pain.
Items within each domain are scored on a 3-point ordinal scale: 0 = cannot perform; 1 = performs partially; and 2 = performs fully.
Subscales can be administered without the using the full test.
For the upper limb motor function subscale used in this clinical trial, 33 items were evaluated, each rated on a 3-point scale (0-2), then summed for a maximum possible score of 66.
A greater increase in the score represents a greater improvement in upper limb motor function.
|
After study intervention (on completion of the maximum planned number of sessions for their group or discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, whichever came first) compared to baseline at study enrollment between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.
|
Fugl-Meyer Score Change at 6 Months
Délai: FMA at 6 months from study enrollment compared to baseline FMA performed prior to study intervention, which began between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.
|
Change in Fugl-Meyer score at 6-months from study enrollment compared to baseline.
Maximum score = 66.
|
FMA at 6 months from study enrollment compared to baseline FMA performed prior to study intervention, which began between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
---|---|---|
Change in FIM Score Immediately Following Study Intervention.
Délai: After study intervention (on completion of the maximum planned number of sessions for each group or discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, whichever came first) compared to baseline at study enrollment between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.
|
Change in the upper limb portion of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was assessed to determine treatment impact on independence in activities of daily living (ADL).
The FIM indicates the level of disability based on how much assistance is required for an individual to carry out ADL.
It can be used to assess13 motor and 5 cognitive tasks, each rated on a 7 point ordinal scale (0 = total assistance or complete dependence; 7 = complete independence in the task).
Tasks include For this study, a subset of 9 tasks involving the upper limbs was used (maximum score = 63).
A greater change represents a greater improvement in independence carrying out tasks requiring functional use of the upper limbs.
|
After study intervention (on completion of the maximum planned number of sessions for each group or discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, whichever came first) compared to baseline at study enrollment between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.
|
Change in FIM Score at 6-months
Délai: Change in FIM score at 6-months from study enrollment compared to baseline FIM prior to study intervention, which began between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.
|
Change in FIM score at 6-months from study enrollment compared to baseline. Maximum score = 63 . |
Change in FIM score at 6-months from study enrollment compared to baseline FIM prior to study intervention, which began between 7 and 21 days post-stroke.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Charles Burgar, MD, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
1 janvier 2002
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
1 juillet 2008
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
1 juillet 2008
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
14 septembre 2005
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
14 septembre 2005
Première publication (Estimation)
22 septembre 2005
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)
17 février 2014
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
3 janvier 2014
Dernière vérification
1 janvier 2014
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- B2695-I
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .
Essais cliniques sur Robot-Low
-
University of MichiganNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Brown University; Pennington Biomedical... et autres collaborateursRecrutement
-
Young 1oveUniversity of OxfordRecrutementLié à la grossesse | Comportement, SantéBostwana
-
Anumana, Inc.Mayo ClinicPas encore de recrutementFraction d'éjection ventriculaireÉtats-Unis
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamPas encore de recrutementDiabète de type 2 | Handicap physique
-
Cook Research IncorporatedComplétéAnévrismes de l'aorte abdominale | Anévrismes iliaques | Anévrismes aortoiliaquesÉtats-Unis, Canada
-
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityComplété
-
Université de SherbrookeQuebec Pain Research NetworkComplété
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreActif, ne recrute pasSéquelles d'AVC | HémiparésieÉtats-Unis
-
DePuy InternationalComplétéArthroplastie, Remplacement, GenouIrlande
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesUniversity of Southern CaliforniaComplété