Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Ruxolitinib in Patients With Breast Cancer

3 janvier 2017 mis à jour par: Nancy Lin, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Phase II Study of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) in Patients With PSTAT3+ Breast Cancer

Ruxolitinib is a drug which blocks the Janus tyrosine Kinase (JAK) signaling pathway. It is thought that this pathway might be important in certain types of breast cancer, and that blocking this pathway might lead to anti-cancer effects. This study is testing the effects of ruxolitinib in patients with breast cancer.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Résilié

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Objectives:

Primary

  • The primary objective of this two-stage, phase II study is to estimate the objective response rate to ruxolitinib in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced breast cancer which is pStat3+ and which has progressed on at least one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease, and/or has recurred within 12 months of completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy.

Secondary

  • To describe the toxicity profile
  • To evaluate clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD >/= 24 weeks)
  • To estimate progression-free and overall survival

Exploratory

  • To explore whether baseline hs-CRP level higher than the group median is associated with objective response
  • To explore whether baseline IL-6 level higher than the group median is associated with objective response
  • To describe hs-CRP level over time, and to describe the proportion of patients with a) hs-CRP > 3mg/L at baseline, on treatment, and at time of progression, and b) hs-CRP > 1mg/L at baseline, on treatment, and at time of progression
  • To describe IL-6 level over time, and to describe the proportion of patients with IL-6 level above the upper limit of normal at baseline, on treatment, and at time of progression
  • To describe pStat3 status by IHC in baseline metastatic biopsies
  • To describe pStat3 status by IHC in on-study biopsies
  • To describe pStat3 status by IHC in the time of progression biopsy samples
  • To characterize archival and metastatic biopsy samples using triple immunofluorescence for CD44, CD24, and pStat3
  • To characterize archival and metastatic biopsy samples using a previously characterized pStat3 gene signature
  • To characterize circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for CD44, CD24, and pStat3 at baseline and time of progression

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

21

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02215
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
      • Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed invasive breast cancer
  • Must have known ER, PR and HER2 status
  • Either, Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer or
  • Inflammatory Breast Cancer with any ER, PR HER2 status
  • Availability of archival tissue specimen suitable for pStat3 testing
  • Life expectancy of greater than 3 months
  • Measurable disease by RECIST
  • At least one prior chemotherapy regimen for treatment of metastatic breast cancer and/or recurrence within 12 months of completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy or
  • For patients with inflammatory breast cancer but no distant metastases, progression through standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy is required

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Active brain metastases
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to ruxolitinib
  • Clinically significant malabsorption syndrome
  • Concurrent use of medications/substances that are strong inhibitors of CY3A4
  • No uncontrolled intercurrent illness

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Ruxolitinib-Cohort A
Patients received Ruxolitinib 25 mg twice daily for up to 12 cycles (cycle duration=28 days) until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients enrolled sequentially into two possible cohorts based on pStat3+ expression score by central testing: Cohort A - moderate to high positive status defined as a score of >/=5 by central testing or Cohort B - low positive status defined as a score of 3-4. Each cohort was evaluated with a 2 stage design. Cohort B only opened if 2 objective responses were observed in 1st stage Cohort A patients (n=21).
Autres noms:
  • Jakafi
  • OICS018424
Expérimental: Ruxolitinib-Cohort B
Patients received Ruxolitinib 25 mg twice daily for up to 12 cycles (cycle duration=28 days) until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients enrolled sequentially into two possible cohorts based on pStat3+ expression score by central testing: Cohort A - moderate to high positive status defined as a score of >/=5 by central testing or Cohort B - low positive status defined as a score of 3-4. Each cohort was evaluated with a 2 stage design. Cohort B only opened if 2 objective responses were observed in 1st stage Cohort A patients (n=21).
Autres noms:
  • Jakafi
  • OICS018424

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Objective Response Rate
Délai: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 12 cycles. Treatment duration was a median of 2 cycles range (1-5).
The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST 1.1 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 12 cycles. Treatment duration was a median of 2 cycles range (1-5).

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Clinical Benefit Rate
Délai: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 12 cycles. Treatment duration was a median of 2 cycles range (1-5).
Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was defined as achieving complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) for 24 weeks or longer based on RECIST 1.1 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.1 for target lesions: CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions (smallest sum LD reference), new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Stable disease (SD) is defined as any condition not meeting the above criteria. SD needed to be a minimum 24 weeks in duration.
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity up to 12 cycles. Treatment duration was a median of 2 cycles range (1-5).
Overall Survival
Délai: In long-term follow-up, patients were followed for survival every 4 months for up to 2 years. Median follow-up in this study cohort was 4.5 months (range 0.6-21.9).
Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive and estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods.
In long-term follow-up, patients were followed for survival every 4 months for up to 2 years. Median follow-up in this study cohort was 4.5 months (range 0.6-21.9).
Progression-Free Survival
Délai: Disease was evaluated radiologically every 8 weeks on treatment through 12 cycles and in long-term follow-up every 4 months for up to 2 years. Median follow-up in this study cohort was 4.5 months (range 0.6-21.9).
Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) or death. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or equivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Disease was evaluated radiologically every 8 weeks on treatment through 12 cycles and in long-term follow-up every 4 months for up to 2 years. Median follow-up in this study cohort was 4.5 months (range 0.6-21.9).

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 juin 2012

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juin 2015

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 juin 2016

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

20 mars 2012

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

22 mars 2012

Première publication (Estimation)

26 mars 2012

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

23 février 2017

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

3 janvier 2017

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2017

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 12-024

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Cancer du sein

Essais cliniques sur Ruxolitinib

3
S'abonner