Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Open Trial Determining Antidepressant Effects of Omega-3 Supplementation During Pregnancy

26 avril 2017 mis à jour par: William Coryell
The purpose of this study is to determine if omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as a monotherapy have antidepressant effects during pregnancy. It will also provide pilot data pertaining to relationships between apparent response to omega-3 monotherapy and both plasma cytokine and erythrocyte essential fatty acid concentrations.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Pregnancy does not reduce the risk of recurrence among women who have previously experienced depressive illness and the advent of new episodes during pregnancy raises particular problems. Lingering concerns over the possible teratogenicity of medications in general leave many women reluctant to continue preexisting antidepressant prophylaxis or to accept new trials of conventional antidepressant treatment. There is also now accumulating evidence that the SSRIs have short-, and perhaps longer-term, adverse effects on the newborn.

The antidepressant effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation may offer a particularly appropriate alternative to conventional therapy for depressive episodes that occur during pregnancy. The nutritional needs of the fetus increase the likelihood of omega-3 PUFA deficits in the mother but access to adequate omega-3 PUFAs through fish intake is limited due to concerns over mercury levels. Because polyunsaturated fatty acids are dietary components essential for both fetal development and maternal health, and because their use as supplementation carries a minimal to non-existent side effect burden, women may be more likely to accept omega-3 supplementation over that of conventional antidepressants to manage depressive illness if provided sufficient evidence for effectiveness.

Data supporting the antidepressant potential of omega-3 PUFA supplementation derive first from numerous case-control studies that have associated depressive illness with lower tissue concentrations of omega-3 PUFAs and with higher ratios of omega-6 to omega-3. These findings prompted antidepressant trials of omega-3 supplementation as augmentation or as mono-therapy and many reports described significant benefits over placebo, including one that targeted pregnant women and yielded a large effect size. A number of other trials, however, failed to show clear antidepressant effects. Meta-analyses have highlighted these inconsistencies in results but have found no explanations for them in differing sample demographics, baseline depressive severity levels, PUFA dosing, or trial durations. Other sources of study outcome differences undoubtedly exist and a clear possibility is that the studies with positive results involved subjects more likely to truly benefit from omega-3 supplementation. The characteristics of such individuals are entirely unknown. Though valid predictors of antidepressant response to omega-3 PUFA supplementation would provide powerful tools for personalizing treatment no study has sought to identify them.

One feature that might characterize an individual likely to respond to omega-3 PUFA supplementation is, of course, the presence of relatively low tissue concentrations of omega-3 PUFAs and/or high ratios of omega-6 to omega-3 concentrations. The likelihood that omega-3 PUFA supplementation exerts antidepressant effects via modulation of the inflammatory cascade, and the extensive evidence that high levels of pro-inflammatory markers characterize individuals with depressive disorders, indicate that these measures too may help to select those most likely to benefit from treatment with omega-3 PUFAs.

The identification of response predictors for a specific antidepressant strategy would not only have value for the selection of acute treatment for individuals with active depression but could also be used to choose preventative strategies for individuals who are not currently depressed but who are at high risk because of a recent history of a depressive episode. Prophylaxis against depressive illness in such individuals would have special importance during pregnancy. The adverse effects of depressive illness on both maternal and newborn well-being are widely appreciated but women who develop depressive disorders during pregnancy may, for a variety of reasons, fail to report symptoms to their health care provider or, if they do, treatment response may be delayed or even absent after one or more trials.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

3

Phase

  • Première phase 1

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 50 ans (Adulte)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Femelle

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women with uncomplicated pregnancy within the 1st or 2nd trimester of pregnancy
  2. Score of 10 or greater on the nine item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. antidepressant use in preceding month
  2. use in previous 4 weeks of psychotropic medications other than hypnotics or benzodiazepines in diazepam dose-equivalents greater than or equal to 2mg/day for insomnia
  3. Fish allergy
  4. initiation of regularly scheduled course of psychotherapy within previous 2 months

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Supplementation
Subjects received Omega-3 PUFA supplementation
Subjects received 2.2g of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 1.2g docosahexaenoic daily for the duration of the study
Autres noms:
  • acide eicosapentaénoïque (EPA)
  • acide docosahexaénoïque (DHA)

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D)
Délai: Subjects were administered the HAM-D at Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies.
The HAM-D is a multiple item semi-structured clinician administered questionnaire used to assess the range, type and severity of depressive symptoms observed in patients with MDD. The HAM-D24 consists of 24 symptoms, each of which is rated from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, where 0 is none/absent. The HAMD-24 total score is calculated as the sum of the 24 individual symptom scores; the total score can range from 0 to 76. Higher HAMD-24 scores indicate more severe depression.
Subjects were administered the HAM-D at Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies.
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)
Délai: Subjects were administered the MADRS on Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies.
The MADRS is a clinician administered semi-structured scaled designed to detect changes in depressive symptoms. The scale contains 10 items and ratings are graded from 0 to 6 , with 0 representing an absence of a symptom and 6 corresponding to the most severe degree of MDD symptomology.
Subjects were administered the MADRS on Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies.
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
Délai: Subjects were asked to complete the EPDS on Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies
The EPDS is a self-administered depression screen for postpartum women. The EPDS consists of 10 questions. Responses are scored 0,, 1, 2, or 3 according to increased severity of the symptom. Items marked with an * are reversed scored. A total score of 13 or more suggests follow-up intervention is warranted.
Subjects were asked to complete the EPDS on Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies
Beck Depression Scale (BDI)
Délai: Subjects were asked to complete the BDI on Day 1 and every month thereafter through week 38 of their pregnancies
The BDI is a self-administered questionnaire developed to detect, assess, and monitor changes in depressive symptoms. It is composed of 21 items, each with 4 possible responses scored from 0 to 3 with 3 indicating a higher level of severity. For people who have been clinically diagnosed, scores from 0 to 9 represent minimal depressive symptoms, scores of 10 to 16 indicate mild depression, scores of 17 to 29 indicate moderate depression, and scores of 30 to 63 indicate severe depression.
Subjects were asked to complete the BDI on Day 1 and every month thereafter through week 38 of their pregnancies

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 mai 2011

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 février 2012

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 février 2012

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

30 mars 2017

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 mars 2017

Première publication (Réel)

5 avril 2017

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

28 avril 2017

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 avril 2017

Dernière vérification

1 avril 2017

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

Non

Description du régime IPD

The Investigator does not intend to share IPD

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Omega-3 PUFA supplementation

3
S'abonner