Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Open Trial Determining Antidepressant Effects of Omega-3 Supplementation During Pregnancy

26 de abril de 2017 actualizado por: William Coryell
The purpose of this study is to determine if omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as a monotherapy have antidepressant effects during pregnancy. It will also provide pilot data pertaining to relationships between apparent response to omega-3 monotherapy and both plasma cytokine and erythrocyte essential fatty acid concentrations.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Pregnancy does not reduce the risk of recurrence among women who have previously experienced depressive illness and the advent of new episodes during pregnancy raises particular problems. Lingering concerns over the possible teratogenicity of medications in general leave many women reluctant to continue preexisting antidepressant prophylaxis or to accept new trials of conventional antidepressant treatment. There is also now accumulating evidence that the SSRIs have short-, and perhaps longer-term, adverse effects on the newborn.

The antidepressant effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation may offer a particularly appropriate alternative to conventional therapy for depressive episodes that occur during pregnancy. The nutritional needs of the fetus increase the likelihood of omega-3 PUFA deficits in the mother but access to adequate omega-3 PUFAs through fish intake is limited due to concerns over mercury levels. Because polyunsaturated fatty acids are dietary components essential for both fetal development and maternal health, and because their use as supplementation carries a minimal to non-existent side effect burden, women may be more likely to accept omega-3 supplementation over that of conventional antidepressants to manage depressive illness if provided sufficient evidence for effectiveness.

Data supporting the antidepressant potential of omega-3 PUFA supplementation derive first from numerous case-control studies that have associated depressive illness with lower tissue concentrations of omega-3 PUFAs and with higher ratios of omega-6 to omega-3. These findings prompted antidepressant trials of omega-3 supplementation as augmentation or as mono-therapy and many reports described significant benefits over placebo, including one that targeted pregnant women and yielded a large effect size. A number of other trials, however, failed to show clear antidepressant effects. Meta-analyses have highlighted these inconsistencies in results but have found no explanations for them in differing sample demographics, baseline depressive severity levels, PUFA dosing, or trial durations. Other sources of study outcome differences undoubtedly exist and a clear possibility is that the studies with positive results involved subjects more likely to truly benefit from omega-3 supplementation. The characteristics of such individuals are entirely unknown. Though valid predictors of antidepressant response to omega-3 PUFA supplementation would provide powerful tools for personalizing treatment no study has sought to identify them.

One feature that might characterize an individual likely to respond to omega-3 PUFA supplementation is, of course, the presence of relatively low tissue concentrations of omega-3 PUFAs and/or high ratios of omega-6 to omega-3 concentrations. The likelihood that omega-3 PUFA supplementation exerts antidepressant effects via modulation of the inflammatory cascade, and the extensive evidence that high levels of pro-inflammatory markers characterize individuals with depressive disorders, indicate that these measures too may help to select those most likely to benefit from treatment with omega-3 PUFAs.

The identification of response predictors for a specific antidepressant strategy would not only have value for the selection of acute treatment for individuals with active depression but could also be used to choose preventative strategies for individuals who are not currently depressed but who are at high risk because of a recent history of a depressive episode. Prophylaxis against depressive illness in such individuals would have special importance during pregnancy. The adverse effects of depressive illness on both maternal and newborn well-being are widely appreciated but women who develop depressive disorders during pregnancy may, for a variety of reasons, fail to report symptoms to their health care provider or, if they do, treatment response may be delayed or even absent after one or more trials.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

3

Fase

  • Fase temprana 1

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 50 años (Adulto)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Femenino

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women with uncomplicated pregnancy within the 1st or 2nd trimester of pregnancy
  2. Score of 10 or greater on the nine item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. antidepressant use in preceding month
  2. use in previous 4 weeks of psychotropic medications other than hypnotics or benzodiazepines in diazepam dose-equivalents greater than or equal to 2mg/day for insomnia
  3. Fish allergy
  4. initiation of regularly scheduled course of psychotherapy within previous 2 months

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Supplementation
Subjects received Omega-3 PUFA supplementation
Subjects received 2.2g of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 1.2g docosahexaenoic daily for the duration of the study
Otros nombres:
  • ácido eicosapentaenoico (EPA)
  • ácido docosahexaenoico (DHA)

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D)
Periodo de tiempo: Subjects were administered the HAM-D at Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies.
The HAM-D is a multiple item semi-structured clinician administered questionnaire used to assess the range, type and severity of depressive symptoms observed in patients with MDD. The HAM-D24 consists of 24 symptoms, each of which is rated from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, where 0 is none/absent. The HAMD-24 total score is calculated as the sum of the 24 individual symptom scores; the total score can range from 0 to 76. Higher HAMD-24 scores indicate more severe depression.
Subjects were administered the HAM-D at Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies.
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)
Periodo de tiempo: Subjects were administered the MADRS on Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies.
The MADRS is a clinician administered semi-structured scaled designed to detect changes in depressive symptoms. The scale contains 10 items and ratings are graded from 0 to 6 , with 0 representing an absence of a symptom and 6 corresponding to the most severe degree of MDD symptomology.
Subjects were administered the MADRS on Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies.
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
Periodo de tiempo: Subjects were asked to complete the EPDS on Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies
The EPDS is a self-administered depression screen for postpartum women. The EPDS consists of 10 questions. Responses are scored 0,, 1, 2, or 3 according to increased severity of the symptom. Items marked with an * are reversed scored. A total score of 13 or more suggests follow-up intervention is warranted.
Subjects were asked to complete the EPDS on Day 1 and every month thereafter until week 38 of their pregnancies
Beck Depression Scale (BDI)
Periodo de tiempo: Subjects were asked to complete the BDI on Day 1 and every month thereafter through week 38 of their pregnancies
The BDI is a self-administered questionnaire developed to detect, assess, and monitor changes in depressive symptoms. It is composed of 21 items, each with 4 possible responses scored from 0 to 3 with 3 indicating a higher level of severity. For people who have been clinically diagnosed, scores from 0 to 9 represent minimal depressive symptoms, scores of 10 to 16 indicate mild depression, scores of 17 to 29 indicate moderate depression, and scores of 30 to 63 indicate severe depression.
Subjects were asked to complete the BDI on Day 1 and every month thereafter through week 38 of their pregnancies

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2011

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de febrero de 2012

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de febrero de 2012

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

30 de marzo de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

30 de marzo de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

5 de abril de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

28 de abril de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

26 de abril de 2017

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

No

Descripción del plan IPD

The Investigator does not intend to share IPD

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Omega-3 PUFA supplementation

3
Suscribir