- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT03386539
Tacrolimus/Everolimus vs Tacrolimus/MMF chez les receveurs de transplantation cardiaque pédiatrique utilisant le score MATE (TEAMMATE)
Essai clinique randomisé multicentrique ouvert de phase III comparant l'évérolimus et le tacrolimus à faible dose au tacrolimus et au mycophénolate mofétil 6 mois après la greffe pour prévenir les complications à long terme après une greffe cardiaque pédiatrique
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, États-Unis, 35233
- Children's of Alabama
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, États-Unis, 85016
- Phoenix Children's Hospital
-
-
California
-
Loma Linda, California, États-Unis, 92354
- Loma Linda University
-
Los Angeles, California, États-Unis, 90027
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles
-
Los Angeles, California, États-Unis, 90095
- UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital
-
Palo Alto, California, États-Unis, 94304
- Stanford University
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, États-Unis, 80045
- Children's Hospital Colorado
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, États-Unis, 20010
- Children's National Medical Center
-
-
Florida
-
Gainesville, Florida, États-Unis, 32610-0297
- University of Florida Congenital Heart Center
-
Hollywood, Florida, États-Unis, 33021
- Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, États-Unis, 30322
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Emory
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, États-Unis, 60611
- Lurie Children's Hospital
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, États-Unis, 02115
- Boston Children's Hospital
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, États-Unis, 48109
- University of Michigan Medical Center
-
-
Missouri
-
St Louis, Missouri, États-Unis, 63110
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, États-Unis, 10032
- Children's Hospital of New York
-
The Bronx, New York, États-Unis, 10803
- Children's Hospital at Montefiore
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, États-Unis, 45229
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 19104
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 15224
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, États-Unis, 75235
- Children's Health Dallas University of Texas Southwestern
-
Houston, Texas, États-Unis, 77027
- Texas Children's Hospital
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, États-Unis, 84132
- Primary Children's Hospital
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, États-Unis, 98105
- Seattle Children's Hospital
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, États-Unis, 53226
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Critère d'intégration:
- Transplantation cardiaque orthotopique
- Âge < 21 ans au moment de la greffe
- Immunosuppression stable au moment de la randomisation sans contre-indication à l'évérolimus, au tacrolimus ou au mycophénolate mofétil
- Suivi planifié sur un site d'étude pendant la durée de 30 mois de l'étude.
- Sujet ou représentant légal majeur capable de donner un consentement éclairé (en général, le consentement sera demandé pour les enfants âgés de 12 ans ou plus).
Critère d'exclusion:
- Greffe de plusieurs organes (par ex. cœur-poumon ou cœur-foie).
- Hypersensibilité connue à l'évérolimus, au sirolimus, au tacrolimus ou au mycophénolate mofétil (MMF), ou aux composants des produits médicamenteux.
- Patients sous corticothérapie d'entretien dépassant une dose équivalente de prednisone 0,1 mg/kg/jour lors de la randomisation.
- Risque élevé de rejet défini comme un rejet actif, un rejet cellulaire récurrent (≥ 2 épisodes de rejet de grade 2R), un rejet récurrent (≥ 2 épisodes de tout grade) avec compromis hémodynamique, un rejet résistant aux stéroïdes ou un rejet médié par les anticorps non résolu au cours de la première 6 mois post-transplantation cardiaque
- Dysfonctionnement du greffon (FEVG < 40 % ou pression de coin > 22 mmHg ou index cardiaque < 2,2 L/min/m2)
- Stade 4 ou 5 CKD (eGFR <30 ml/min/1,73 m2)
- Protéinurie modérée ou sévère
- Infection active nécessitant une hospitalisation ou une dose de traitement thérapeutique médicale.
- Patients présentant des problèmes de cicatrisation continus, une infection de plaie cliniquement significative nécessitant un traitement continu ou une autre complication chirurgicale grave de l'avis du chercheur principal du site.
- Cholestérol sérique à jeun ≥ 300 mg/dL OU supérieur ou égal à 7,75 mmol/L, ET triglycérides à jeun ≥ 2,5 x la limite supérieure de la normale (LSN). Remarque : Dans le cas où l'un de ces seuils ou les deux sont dépassés, le patient ne peut être inclus qu'après l'initiation d'un médicament hypolipidémiant approprié, et la réduction des taux sériques de cholestérol et de triglycérides en dessous des plages d'exclusion est confirmée.
- Diabète sucré non contrôlé.
- Diagnostic du trouble lymphoprolifératif post-transplantation (PTLD) au cours des 6 premiers mois post-transplantation cardiaque.
- Antécédents de non-adhésion aux régimes médicaux.
- Patients traités par des médicaments qui sont de puissants inducteurs ou inhibiteurs du cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) et qui ne peuvent pas interrompre le traitement
- Patientes enceintes ou qui allaitent ou qui ont l'intention de tomber enceintes pendant la période d'étude.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Seul
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Évérolimus/tacrolimus à faible dose
Évérolimus environ 0,6 mg/m2/dose pris par voie orale toutes les 12 heures pendant 30 mois. La dose d'évérolimus sera ajustée pour atteindre une concentration minimale de 3 à 8 ng/ml. Tacrolimus 0,0125 mg/kg/dose par voie orale toutes les 12 heures pendant 30 mois. (La dose de tacrolimus sera ajustée pour atteindre une concentration minimale de 3 à 5 ng/ml jusqu'à ce que les sujets soient 1 an après la transplantation cardiaque. Après 1 an après la transplantation cardiaque, la dose de tacrolimus sera ajustée pour atteindre une concentration minimale de 2,5 à 4,5 ng/mL.) |
Comprimé d'évérolimus
Autres noms:
Gélule ou suspension liquide de tacrolimus
Autres noms:
|
|
Comparateur actif: Tacrolimus/Mycophénolate mofétil
Tacrolimus 0,05 mg/kg/dose par voie orale toutes les 12 heures pendant 30 mois. (La dose de tacrolimus sera ajustée pour atteindre une concentration minimale de 7 à 10 ng/ml jusqu'à ce que les sujets soient 1 an après la transplantation cardiaque. Après 1 an après la transplantation cardiaque, la dose de tacrolimus sera ajustée pour atteindre une concentration minimale de 5 à 8 ng/mL.) Mycophénolate mofétil 600 mg/m2/dose par voie orale toutes les 12 heures pendant 30 mois. |
Gélule ou suspension liquide de tacrolimus
Autres noms:
Capsule ou suspension liquide de mycophénolate mofétil
Autres noms:
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
EFFICACY: MATE-3 Score
Délai: 30 months post-randomization
|
MATE-3 is a validated score ranging from 0 to 12.
The score adds together each subscore so that it represents the cumulative burden of three major adverse transplant events: Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), and Biopsy-proven Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR).
Complete details of the score can be found in the study protocol.
A higher score represents a worse outcome.
|
30 months post-randomization
|
|
SAFETY: MATE-6 Score
Délai: 30 months post-randomization
|
MATE-6 is a validated score ranging from 0 to 24.
The score adds together each subscore so that it represents the cumulative burden of all six major adverse transplant events: Coronary Artery Vasculopathy (CAV), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Biopsy-proven Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR), pathologic diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR), Infection, and Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD).
Complete details of the score can be found in the study protocol.
A higher score represents a worse outcome.
|
30 months post-randomization
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy: Overall Patient Survival
Délai: Up to 30 months post-randomization
|
Number of participants who experienced death from any cause
|
Up to 30 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: Overall Allograft Survival
Délai: Up to 30 months post-randomization
|
Number of participants who experienced death or heart re-transplantation
|
Up to 30 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: Change in Kidney Function
Délai: 0 to 6 months, 0 to 12 months, 0 to 30 months post-randomization
|
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the modified Schwartz equation.
A positive number indicates improved kidney function, a negative number indicates worsened kidney function.
|
0 to 6 months, 0 to 12 months, 0 to 30 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: Freedom From CKD Event
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) a chronic kidney disease MATE.
A chronic kidney disease MATE was defined as an eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73
m^2 during follow-up or worsening by at least one MATE score if < 60 ml/min/1.73
m^2 at baseline.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Efficacy: Freedom From CAV Event
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) during follow up as graded by the angiography core laboratory.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Efficacy: Freedom From BP-ACR Event
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) biopsy-proven Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR) MATE event during follow-up.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Efficacy: Freedom From Composite Failure
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) the composite of death, graft loss, 2R/3R acute cellular rejection or rejection with hemodynamic compromise.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Efficacy: EuroQOL EQ-5D Y (Youth Version)
Délai: 30 months post-randomization
|
The EuroQOL EQ-5D Y uses a visual-analog scale and asks the participant to mark an X on the line to show how good or bad your is health TODAY.
The scale ranges from 0 to 100.
|
30 months post-randomization
|
|
Safety: Freedom From AMR
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) a pathologic diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) MATE Event.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Safety: Freedom From Infection
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) a serious infection MATE during follow-up.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Safety: Freedom From PTLD
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) a Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) MATE event during follow-up.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Safety: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Adverse events reported throughout the study.
Adverse events are classified by CTCAE classification.
Serious adverse events include CTCAE classes 3, 4, and 5.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Safety: Freedom From Major Transplant Events (Composite)
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) any MATE event, this includes chronic kidney disease, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, acute cellular rejection, antibody mediated rejection, serious infection, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Safety: Freedom From Grade 2 or Greater Severity CKD Event
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) a chronic kidney disease MATE of Grade 2 or greater (eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73
m^2 or on dialysis) or death due to chronic kidney disease.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Safety: Freedom From Grade 2 or Greater Severity CAV Event
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) a cardiac allograft vasculopathy MATE of Grade 2 or greater.
Grade 2 or greater is the same as having International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation cardiac allograft vasculopathy Grade 2 or 3 or death due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Safety: Freedom From Grade 2 or Greater Severity ACR Event
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) an acute cellular rejection MATE of Grade 2 or greater.
Grade 2 or greater is the equivalent of treated rejection with an assigned International Society of Heart & Lung Transplantation acute cellular rejection grade 2 or grade 3 or rejection with hemodynamic compromise (decreased ejection fraction, need for IV medicine to support heart, need for mechanical circulatory support) or death due to acute cellular rejection.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Safety: Freedom From Grade 2 or Greater Severity AMR Event
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) an antibody mediated rejection MATE of Grade 2 or greater.
Grade 2 or greater is the equivalent of treated rejection with an assigned International Society of Heart & Lung Transplantation antibody mediated rejection grade 2 or grade 3 or antibody mediated rejection with hemodynamic compromise (decreased ejection fraction, need for IV medicine to support heart, need for mechanical circulatory support) or death due to antibody mediated rejection.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Safety: Freedom From Grade 2 or Greater Severity Infection Event
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) a serious infection MATE of Grade 2 or greater.
Grade 2 infections require treatment with intravenous antibiotics or antivirals for 5 or more days.
Grade 3 includes treatment of sepsis, endocarditis, invasive infection, or infection leading to respiratory failure.
Grade 4 is death due to infection.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Safety: Freedom From Grade 2 or Greater Severity PTLD Event
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) a post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease MATE of Grade 2 or greater.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Efficacy: Freedom From Composite of CAV, CKD, BP-ACR, or Any CMV Infection
Délai: From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
Number of participants who are "free from" (have NOT experienced) at least one of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, chronic kidney disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate less than or equal to 60 ml/min/1.73m2,
treated acute cellular rejection, or any cytomegalovirus infection.
A higher number of participants on this measure indicates a better outcome.
|
From enrollment to 30 months after enrollment
|
|
Efficacy: Change in CKD Stage
Délai: Baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization
|
Change in chronic kidney disease stage where improvements in CKD stage can take on a negative value.
|
Baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: MATE-3 Score Where CKD Score is Calculated by Change From Baseline Visit
Délai: Baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization
|
MATE-3 is a validated score ranging from 0 to 12.
The score adds together each subscore so that it represents the cumulative burden of three major adverse transplant events: Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), and Biopsy-proven Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR).
For this version of the score, the chronic kidney disease score is replaced by the change in MATE-CKD score from baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization.
CKD change score can assume a negative value.
This modified score can range from -2 to 12.
A higher score represents a worse outcome.
|
Baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: MATE-3 Score Where CKD Score is Replaced by Change in CKD Stage
Délai: Baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization
|
MATE-3 is a validated score ranging from 0 to 12.
The score adds together each subscore so that it represents the cumulative burden of three major adverse transplant events: Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), and Biopsy-proven Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR).
For this version of the score, the chronic kidney disease score is replaced by the change in chronic kidney disease stage from the baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization.
Chronic kidney disease stage change score can assume a negative value.
This modified score can range from -2 to 12.
A higher score represents a worse outcome.
|
Baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: Composite Score Consisting of MATE CAV, MATE BP-ACR, MATE CKD Score, and Any CMV Infection.
Délai: Baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization
|
Composite score ranging from 0 to 16.
The score adds each subscore to represent the cumulative burden of three major adverse transplant events plus CMV infection.
The three major adverse transplant events are Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), and Biopsy-proven Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR).
Any CMV infection is assigned a score of 1 with additional points using the MATE infection scoring criteria.
Full details of the score can be found in the protocol.
A higher score represents a worse outcome.
|
Baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: Composite Score Consisting of MATE CAV, MATE BP-ACR, Change in CKD Stage, and Any CMV Infection.
Délai: Baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization
|
Composite score ranging from -2 to 16.
The score adds each subscore to represent the cumulative burden of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy (CAV), chronic kidney disease, and Biopsy-proven Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR).
Any CMV infection is assigned a score of 1 with additional points using the MATE infection scoring criteria.
The chronic kidney disease MATE score is replaced by change in CKD stage.
A higher score represents a worse outcome.
|
Baseline visit through 30 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: Lansky Scores
Délai: Baseline
|
Validated functional performance score, assigned by clinician assessment: Lansky score is assigned if < 16 years old at randomization.
Each score is on a 10-100 point scale and is assigned in 10-point increments (i.e. 10, 20, 30, etc.).
A higher score represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline
|
|
Efficacy: Lansky Scores
Délai: 18 months post-randomization
|
Validated functional performance score, assigned by clinician assessment: Lansky score is assigned if < 16 years old at randomization.
Each score is on a 10-100 point scale and is assigned in 10-point increments (i.e. 10, 20, 30, etc.).
A higher score represents a better outcome.
|
18 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: Lansky Scores
Délai: 30 months post-randomization
|
Validated functional performance score, assigned by clinician assessment: Lansky score is assigned if < 16 years old at randomization.
Each score is on a 10-100 point scale and is assigned in 10-point increments (i.e. 10, 20, 30, etc.).
A higher score represents a better outcome.
|
30 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: Karnofsky Scores
Délai: Baseline
|
Validated functional performance score, assigned by clinician assessment: Karnofsky score is assigned if >=16 years at randomization.
Each score is on a 10-100 point scale and is assigned in 10-point increments (i.e. 10, 20, 30, etc.).
A higher score represents a better outcome.
|
Baseline
|
|
Efficacy: Karnofsky Scores
Délai: 18 months post-randomization
|
Validated functional performance score, assigned by clinician assessment: Karnofsky score is assigned if >=16 years at randomization.
Each score is on a 10-100 point scale and is assigned in 10-point increments (i.e. 10, 20, 30, etc.).
A higher score represents a better outcome.
|
18 months post-randomization
|
|
Efficacy: Karnofsky Scores
Délai: 30 months post-randomization
|
Validated functional performance score, assigned by clinician assessment: Karnofsky score is assigned if >=16 years at randomization.
Each score is on a 10-100 point scale and is assigned in 10-point increments (i.e. 10, 20, 30, etc.).
A higher score represents a better outcome.
|
30 months post-randomization
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chaise d'étude: Christopher S Almond, MD, MPH, Stanford University
- Chaise d'étude: Kevin P Daly, MD, Boston Children's Hospital
- Chercheur principal: Lynn A Sleeper, ScD, Boston Children's Hospital
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Almond CS, Hoen H, Rossano JW, Castleberry C, Auerbach SR, Yang L, Lal AK, Everitt MD, Fenton M, Hollander SA, Pahl E, Pruitt E, Rosenthal DN, McElhinney DB, Daly KP, Desai M; Pediatric Heart Transplant Study (PHTS) Group Registry. Development and validation of a major adverse transplant event (MATE) score to predict late graft loss in pediatric heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Apr;37(4):441-450. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
- Castleberry C, Ziniel S, Almond C, Auerbach S, Hollander SA, Lal AK, Fenton M, Pahl E, Rossano JW, Everitt MD, Daly KP. Clinical practice patterns are relatively uniform between pediatric heart transplant centers: A survey-based assessment. Pediatr Transplant. 2017 Aug;21(5). doi: 10.1111/petr.13013. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
- Grimm K, Lehner A, Fernandez Rodriguez S, Orban M, Fischer M, Rosenthal LL, Jakob A, Haas NA, Dalla Pozza R, Kozlik-Feldmann R, Ulrich SM. Conversion to everolimus in pediatric heart transplant recipients is a safe treatment option with an impact on cardiac allograft vasculopathy and renal function. Clin Transplant. 2021 Mar;35(3):e14191. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14191. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
- Almond CS, Sleeper LA, Rossano JW, Bock MJ, Pahl E, Auerbach S, Lal A, Hollander SA, Miyamoto SD, Castleberry C, Lee J, Barkoff LM, Gonzales S, Klein G, Daly KP. The teammate trial: Study design and rationale tacrolimus and everolimus against tacrolimus and MMF in pediatric heart transplantation using the major adverse transplant event (MATE) score. Am Heart J. 2023 Jun;260:100-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
- Almond CS, Daly KP, Albers EL, Alejos JC, Ameduri R, Auerbach SR, Barkoff L, Barnes AP, Bock MJ, Butto A, Carlo WF, Castleberry CD, Chrisant MR, Deshpande SR, Dreyer WJ, Everitt MD, Feingold B, Gonzales S, Hollander SA, Kindel SJ, Klein GL, Lal AK, Lamour JM, Lee J, Lu M, Lytrivi ID, Miyamoto SD, Pahl E, Peng DM, Ryan TD, Singh TP, Su JA, Sutcliffe DL, Ybarra AM, Zangwill S, Rossano JW, Sleeper LA; TEAMMATE Trial Investigators. Everolimus and Low-Dose Tacrolimus After Heart Transplant in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Oct 21;334(15):1339-1348. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.14338.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Maladies urogénitales
- Processus pathologiques
- Maladies urogénitales masculines
- Maladies rénales
- Maladies urologiques
- Maladies urogénitales féminines
- Maladies urogénitales féminines et complications de la grossesse
- Maladie chronique
- Attributs de la maladie
- Insuffisance rénale
- Conditions pathologiques, signes et symptômes
- Comportement
- Comportement social
- Insuffisance rénale chronique
- Rejet, Psychologie
- Produits chimiques organiques
- Acides gras
- Lipides
- Acides, acyclique
- Acides carboxyliques
- Macrolides
- Lactones
- Sirolimus
- Caproates
- Évérolimus
- Acide mycophénolique
- Tacrolimus
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- P00025970
- PR160574 (Autre subvention/numéro de financement: U.S. Department of Defense)
- IND 127980 (Autre identifiant: Food and Drug Administration)
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .