- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT06842446
Algorithme systématique d'apprentissage automatique pour la détection rapide de la thrombose (DVT-SMART)
Évaluation d'une nouvelle stratégie de diagnostic pour une TVP suspectée composée de D-Dimer Point of Care, d'un modèle de prédiction basé sur l'IA et de l'échographie de compression
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of a machine learning-based algorithm and point-of-care D-dimer to laboratory D-dimer and compression ultrasound to exclude deep vein thrombosis in the under extremities in patients referred to a medical department suspected of having deep vein thrombosis. The main aim is to answer are if a machine learning algorithm and point of care D-dimer can exclude deep vein thrombosis in more patients than clinical assessment and D-dimer alone.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
All participants will follow the usual diagnostic algorithm used for patients with suspected DVT referred to Ostfold Hospital (all patients are examined by a physician, D-dimer is analyzed in all patients, ultrasound is performed by a radiologist in patients with positive D-dimer). In addition to usual care, POC D-dimer, POC ultrasound (performed by ED physicians), blood sampling for biobanking, and photographies of the under extremities will be performed. The machine learning model will be tested to see if the prediction is correct. In participants where ultrasound is performed, it will also be assessed whether the machine learning algorithm could have excluded the participant without the use of ultrasound. None of the additional procedures will have any impact on the patient diagnostics or treatment.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Waleed Ghanima, Professor
- Numéro de téléphone: 0047 69860000
- E-mail: waleed.ghanima@so-hf.no
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Hans Joakim Myklebust-Hansen, Medical Doctor
- Numéro de téléphone: 0047 97501765
- E-mail: hans.joakim.hansen@so-hf.no
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Sarpsborg, Norvège, 1714
- Recrutement
- Østfold Hospital Trust
-
Contact:
- Hans J Myklebust-Hansen, M.D.
- Numéro de téléphone: 004797501765
- E-mail: hansjoakim_mh@outlook.com
-
Sous-enquêteur:
- Hans J Myklebust-Hansen, M.D.
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients referred to the ED due to suspicion of DVT
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Ongoing use of anticoagulation for more than 72 hours
- Previous participation in the study
- Life expectancy of less than three months.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Diagnostique
- Répartition: N / A
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: All participants
All participants will be treated the same way. |
POC D-dimer will be compared to laboratory D-dimer in hospital setting and used in a machine learning model Point of care (POC) ultrasound performed by ED physicians compared to ultrasound performed by radiologist. POC ultrasound 3 point examination performed by ED physician will be compared with POC ultrasound full leg examination performed by ED physician. The DSS will be compared to the usual strategy. It will also be estimated how many participants where DVT could have been excluded without ultrasound.
Autres noms:
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety of the new strategy (POC D-dimer, ML-based prediction model, POC CUS by emergency physician)
Délai: From enrollment to the end of the primary assessment period (90 days)
|
Evaluate the safety of a new strategy consisting of POC D-dimer and an ML-based prediction model followed by CUS performed by emergency physicians by comparing the new strategy's safety with our standard care by measuring the proportion of patients in whom DVT is excluded according to the new strategy but was diagnosed with DVT by standard care or in whom DVT is diagnosed within the 90-day follow up. |
From enrollment to the end of the primary assessment period (90 days)
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluate the efficiency of the new strategy
Délai: From enrollment to the end of the primary assessment period (90 days)
|
The proportion of patients in whom DVT can be ruled out by the ML-based prediction model with POC D-dimer compared to the efficiency of Wells score and laboratory D-dimer |
From enrollment to the end of the primary assessment period (90 days)
|
|
Validate the safety and efficiency of the ML-based prediction model
Délai: From enrollment to the end of the primary assessment period (90 days)
|
Safety will be determined by the proportion of patients in whom DVT is excluded by the ML-model but diagnosed by standard care. Efficiency will be determined by the proportion of patients in whom DVT can be excluded by the ML-based model |
From enrollment to the end of the primary assessment period (90 days)
|
|
Evaluate concordance between CUS performed by emergency physicians and radiologists.
Délai: From time of enrollment until time of ultrasound examination performed by radiologist, assessed up to 48 hours.
|
Determine the proportion of false negative and false positive diagnosis of DVT in emergency physician-performed ultrasound compared with ultrasound performed by radiologists. |
From time of enrollment until time of ultrasound examination performed by radiologist, assessed up to 48 hours.
|
|
Evaluate concordance between POC D-dimers in an ED setting and laboratory D-dimers.
Délai: From enrollment to the completion of D-dimer analysis, assessed up to 24 hours.
|
Compare the two POC D-dimers with the STA-Liatest D-dimer and Siemens INNOVANCE by direct comparison of the true/false positive/negative results. |
From enrollment to the completion of D-dimer analysis, assessed up to 24 hours.
|
|
Evaluate the hypothetical time to be completed for the novel strategy compared to the standard strategy.
Délai: From time of enrollment until time of discharge from the emergency department either discharged from the hospital or hospitalized, assessed up to 24 hours.
|
Estimating the total management time defined as time from ED registration to ED discharge in patients evaluated according to the new strategy compared to standard care. |
From time of enrollment until time of discharge from the emergency department either discharged from the hospital or hospitalized, assessed up to 24 hours.
|
|
Evaluate the safety of a limited ultrasound protocol (two-point and proximal) compared to full-leg CUS performed by emergency physicians and radiologists
Délai: 90 days after enrollment.
|
Estimating the proportion of patients in whom DVT was ruled out by the limited ultrasound protocol but was diagnosed with DVT by the whole-leg ultrasound. |
90 days after enrollment.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 682139
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
The plan to share IPD with other researchers are not yet decided because it has not yet been discussed.
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .