Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Comparison of 26G and 30G Needles for Masseter Trigger Point Injections in Patients With Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MASS-NEEDLE)

3 novembre 2026 aggiornato da: Ceylan Guzel, Medipol University

Comparison of Two Needle Gauges (26G and 30G) for Masseter Muscle Trigger Point Injection in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Split-Face Controlled Trial

This randomized split-face study aims to compare the effects of 26G and 30G needles used for masseter trigger point injections with lidocaine in patients with myofascial pain syndrome. Both needle sizes are routinely used in clinical practice. Pain reduction from baseline to day 14 will be compared between the two sides of the face. Secondary outcomes include pain reduction at day 7, procedural pain, injection-site tenderness at 48 hours, bruising, and patient preference. The split-face design allows both needle sizes to be evaluated in the same patient, minimizing individual differences.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Both 26G and 30G needles were routinely used for masseter trigger point injection in our clinic. Comparing these gauges under otherwise standardized conditions may help clarify whether needle selection affects short-term pain reduction, procedural pain, and patient preference. A randomized split-face design permits this comparison within the same patient, reducing the influence of differences between individuals.

The primary objective of this study was to compare the within-patient reduction in palpation-evoked masseter pain between sides treated with 26G and 30G needles from baseline to day 14 following lidocaine injection. Secondary objectives were to compare pain reduction at day 7, overall procedural pain, injection-site tenderness at 48 hours, ecchymosis, and patient preference.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

40

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults aged 18-65 years.

Bilateral masseter myofascial pain persisting for at least 8 weeks.

Baseline palpation-evoked pain score of ≥6 on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on each side.

Presence of at least one active myofascial trigger point within a palpable taut band in each masseter muscle, reproducing the patient's familiar pain.

Diagnosis established according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD).

No previous treatment for masseter myofascial pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant temporomandibular joint arthralgia.

Known allergy to local anesthetics.

Pregnancy or lactation.

Active infection, open lesion, or malignancy at the injection site.

Bleeding diathesis or use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications.

Inability to cooperate with study procedures.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Bilateral Masseter Trigger Point Injection 26 G

All participants received bilateral masseter trigger point injections in a single session. A 26-gauge (26G) needle was randomly assigned to one masseter muscle and a 30-gauge (30G) needle to the contralateral masseter muscle using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Each masseter received 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor using a standardized injection technique. The right masseter was injected first in all participants. Participants and the outcome assessor were blinded to needle-gauge allocation, whereas the injecting clinician was not blinded.

A 26-gauge (0.45 × 13 mm) needle was used for masseter trigger point injection. A total of 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor was administered using a standardized injection technique.

Sperimentale: Bilateral Masseter Trigger Point Injection 30 G

All participants received bilateral masseter trigger point injections in a single session. A 26-gauge (26G) needle was randomly assigned to one masseter muscle and a 30-gauge (30G) needle to the contralateral masseter muscle using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Each masseter received 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor using a standardized injection technique. The right masseter was injected first in all participants. Participants and the outcome assessor were blinded to needle-gauge allocation, whereas the injecting clinician was not blinded.

A 30-gauge (0.45 × 13 mm) needle was used for masseter trigger point injection. A total of 0.3 mL of 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor was administered using a standardized injection technique.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Between-Needle Difference in Palpation-Evoked Masseter Pain Reduction From Baseline to Day 14
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Day 14 (14 days after injection)

Palpation-evoked masseter pain was assessed separately on each side using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). At baseline and day 14, pain was recorded at the most painful trigger point identified during each assessment. Pain reduction was calculated as baseline NRS minus day 14 NRS for each side. The primary outcome was the within-participant difference in pain reduction between the 30G and 26G needle interventions (30G minus 26G). Positive values indicated greater pain reduction with 30G.

Baseline and Day 14 (14 days after injection)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Between-Needle Difference in Palpation-Evoked Masseter Pain Reduction at Day 7
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Day 7

Palpation-evoked masseter pain was assessed separately on each side using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Pain reduction was calculated as baseline NRS minus day 7 NRS for each side. The within-participant difference in pain reduction between the 30G and 26G needle interventions was calculated as 30G minus 26G. Positive values indicated greater pain reduction with 30G.

Baseline and Day 7

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Overall Procedural Pain During Masseter Trigger Point Injection
Lasso di tempo: Day 0 (within 60 seconds after each injection)

Overall procedural pain was assessed separately for the 26G and 30G needle interventions using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants rated the entire injection procedure, including skin penetration, intramuscular needle manipulation, and lidocaine administration. Pain was recorded within 60 seconds after each injection. Within-participant pain scores were compared between needle gauges.

Day 0 (within 60 seconds after each injection)

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

20 novembre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 gennaio 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 febbraio 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

3 novembre 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

3 novembre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

9 novembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

9 novembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

3 novembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 novembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • E-10840098-50.04-5377

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .