- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT04871620
Reliability of a New Pulse Contour Technique for Diagnosing an Increase in Stroke Volume During a Fluid Challenge for Hemodynamic Optimization in Patients Scheduled for High-risk Abdominal Surgery: Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography: COMPARE Study (COMPARE)
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
In European countries, day-7 mortality rate could reach 1-5. %. Emergency conditions, American Society Assessment (ASA) and major surgery were associated with a higher risk of immediate mortality. Moreover, hemodynamic instability is well known to lead to postoperative complications and a higher risk of mortality.
Since, nearly 30 years, optimization of hemodynamic conditions, especially via an optimization of the fluid administration has been shown to improve immediate and long-term patient outcome. This strategy is currently widely accepted and recommended in medium and high-risk surgery. Therefore, optimizing cardiac output and one of its surrogate is proposed over intraoperative surgery. For assessing the cardiac output or the indexed stroke volume, esophageal Doppler and pulse contour technique have been proposed and have shown that they could improve patient outcome.
However, the reliability of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour and non-invasive techniques assessing cardiac output and its ability to detect a change in the initial value of CO have been challenged. Initially, the reliability of a technique for measuring CO has been described by using a correlation coefficient and by building Bland & Altman diagram. However, searching a correlation between two different techniques measuring the same parameter will lead to a correlation. In the same, Bland & Altman technique shows the mean difference between measurements of the same parameters; However, demonstrating a good reliability should be shown by a narrow limit of agreement with no definition of the narrowness. Indeed, a value of cardiac index (CI) = 3 l/min/m2 with a mean difference of 0 +/- 1.1 /min/m2 by Bland & Altman technique mean that the CI value could be within 1 and 5 l/min/m2 that could lead to different treatment such as fluid challenge, vasopressor or inotrope infusion.
An interesting method for comparing two techniques measuring the same parameter could be to challenge one technique versus the other one in decision-making. Applying this method to techniques measuring CO, we could search for the interest of a new technique for diagnosing an increase in CO after a fluid challenge for optimizing cardiac preload and hemodynamic status. Esophageal Doppler is classically recommended for optimizing hemodynamic patient in high-risk surgery.
A new device using pulse contour technology has been available since a few years. Therefore, the present study aims at assessing the ability of this device for diagnosing an increase in CO > 15% during patient hemodynamic optimization by fluid challenge.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Anticipato)
Contatti e Sedi
Contatto studio
- Nome: Jean Yves LEFRANT
- Email: jean.yves.lefrant@chu-nimes.fr
Luoghi di studio
-
-
-
Nimes 9, Francia, 30029
- Reclutamento
- CHU de Nimes
-
Contatto:
- Jean Yves LEFRANT, MD, PhD
- Email: jean.yves.lefrant@chu-nimes.fr
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Metodo di campionamento
Popolazione di studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patient ASA status 1-3 who were orally informed and did refuse to participate.
- Patient in whom general anesthesia with tracheal intubation were planned.
- Patient in whom an arterial catheter and a monitoring of cardiac output by esophageal Doppler were indicated for hemodynamic optimization
- Patient with cardiac sinusal mode
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient < 18-year-old
- Cardiac arrythmia
- Patient with anomaly in oro-pharyngo-esophageal tractus
- Patients with hemostasis anomaly (PT < 30%, platelets < 50 000 elements/mm3)
- Patient in whom the cardiac output monitoring or measurement was not possible by Esophageal Doppler or echography
- Patients in whom cardiac arrythmia occurred during the procedure of hemodynamic optimization.
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Modelli osservazionali: Coorte
- Prospettive temporali: Prospettiva
Coorti e interventi
Gruppo / Coorte |
Intervento / Trattamento |
---|---|
Hemodynamic optimization
Patients scheduled for intermediate and high-risk abdominal surgery were eligible to participate
|
The stroke volume will be measured before and after 15 minutes fluid challenge with crystalloids
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
---|---|---|
Ability of pulse contour for diagnosing a >15% increase in stroke volume
Lasso di tempo: 15 minutes
|
Ability of pulse contour for diagnosing a >15% increase in stroke volume
|
15 minutes
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
---|---|---|
Comparison with the ability of other techniques
Lasso di tempo: 15 minutes
|
Comparison with the ability of other techniques (Esophagial Doppler, other pulse contour techniques for diagnosing a >15% SV increase)
|
15 minutes
|
Ability for predicting a >15% SV increase
Lasso di tempo: 15 minutes
|
Ability of Esophagial Doppler and Pulse contour techniques for predicting a >15% SV increase after rapid infusion of 100ml cristalloid over one minute (mini-fluid challenge)
|
15 minutes
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Anticipato)
Completamento dello studio (Anticipato)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- LOCAL/2021/PC-01
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Chirurgia
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletatoIdoneo per Day Case SurgeryFrancia