- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT04871620
Reliability of a New Pulse Contour Technique for Diagnosing an Increase in Stroke Volume During a Fluid Challenge for Hemodynamic Optimization in Patients Scheduled for High-risk Abdominal Surgery: Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography: COMPARE Study (COMPARE)
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
In European countries, day-7 mortality rate could reach 1-5. %. Emergency conditions, American Society Assessment (ASA) and major surgery were associated with a higher risk of immediate mortality. Moreover, hemodynamic instability is well known to lead to postoperative complications and a higher risk of mortality.
Since, nearly 30 years, optimization of hemodynamic conditions, especially via an optimization of the fluid administration has been shown to improve immediate and long-term patient outcome. This strategy is currently widely accepted and recommended in medium and high-risk surgery. Therefore, optimizing cardiac output and one of its surrogate is proposed over intraoperative surgery. For assessing the cardiac output or the indexed stroke volume, esophageal Doppler and pulse contour technique have been proposed and have shown that they could improve patient outcome.
However, the reliability of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour and non-invasive techniques assessing cardiac output and its ability to detect a change in the initial value of CO have been challenged. Initially, the reliability of a technique for measuring CO has been described by using a correlation coefficient and by building Bland & Altman diagram. However, searching a correlation between two different techniques measuring the same parameter will lead to a correlation. In the same, Bland & Altman technique shows the mean difference between measurements of the same parameters; However, demonstrating a good reliability should be shown by a narrow limit of agreement with no definition of the narrowness. Indeed, a value of cardiac index (CI) = 3 l/min/m2 with a mean difference of 0 +/- 1.1 /min/m2 by Bland & Altman technique mean that the CI value could be within 1 and 5 l/min/m2 that could lead to different treatment such as fluid challenge, vasopressor or inotrope infusion.
An interesting method for comparing two techniques measuring the same parameter could be to challenge one technique versus the other one in decision-making. Applying this method to techniques measuring CO, we could search for the interest of a new technique for diagnosing an increase in CO after a fluid challenge for optimizing cardiac preload and hemodynamic status. Esophageal Doppler is classically recommended for optimizing hemodynamic patient in high-risk surgery.
A new device using pulse contour technology has been available since a few years. Therefore, the present study aims at assessing the ability of this device for diagnosing an increase in CO > 15% during patient hemodynamic optimization by fluid challenge.
Studietype
Registrering (Forventet)
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Jean Yves LEFRANT
- E-post: jean.yves.lefrant@chu-nimes.fr
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Nimes 9, Frankrike, 30029
- Rekruttering
- CHU de Nimes
-
Ta kontakt med:
- Jean Yves LEFRANT, MD, PhD
- E-post: jean.yves.lefrant@chu-nimes.fr
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Prøvetakingsmetode
Studiepopulasjon
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patient ASA status 1-3 who were orally informed and did refuse to participate.
- Patient in whom general anesthesia with tracheal intubation were planned.
- Patient in whom an arterial catheter and a monitoring of cardiac output by esophageal Doppler were indicated for hemodynamic optimization
- Patient with cardiac sinusal mode
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient < 18-year-old
- Cardiac arrythmia
- Patient with anomaly in oro-pharyngo-esophageal tractus
- Patients with hemostasis anomaly (PT < 30%, platelets < 50 000 elements/mm3)
- Patient in whom the cardiac output monitoring or measurement was not possible by Esophageal Doppler or echography
- Patients in whom cardiac arrythmia occurred during the procedure of hemodynamic optimization.
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Observasjonsmodeller: Kohort
- Tidsperspektiver: Potensielle
Kohorter og intervensjoner
Gruppe / Kohort |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
---|---|
Hemodynamic optimization
Patients scheduled for intermediate and high-risk abdominal surgery were eligible to participate
|
The stroke volume will be measured before and after 15 minutes fluid challenge with crystalloids
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
Ability of pulse contour for diagnosing a >15% increase in stroke volume
Tidsramme: 15 minutes
|
Ability of pulse contour for diagnosing a >15% increase in stroke volume
|
15 minutes
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
Comparison with the ability of other techniques
Tidsramme: 15 minutes
|
Comparison with the ability of other techniques (Esophagial Doppler, other pulse contour techniques for diagnosing a >15% SV increase)
|
15 minutes
|
Ability for predicting a >15% SV increase
Tidsramme: 15 minutes
|
Ability of Esophagial Doppler and Pulse contour techniques for predicting a >15% SV increase after rapid infusion of 100ml cristalloid over one minute (mini-fluid challenge)
|
15 minutes
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Primær fullføring (Forventet)
Studiet fullført (Forventet)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- LOCAL/2021/PC-01
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .
Kliniske studier på Kirurgi
-
Zagazig UniversityFullførtCervical Spine SurgeryEgypt
-
Zagazig UniversityRekrutteringCervical Spine SurgeryEgypt
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)FullførtFast Track Recovery SurgeryMalaysia
-
Seoul National University HospitalUkjent
-
Karolinska InstitutetErsta Hospital, SwedenFullførtLoopileostomi | Fast Track-program, (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS))Sverige
-
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health...Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanFullførtAuricular akupressur | Cervical Spine SurgeryTaiwan
-
Gangnam Severance HospitalFullførtIntubasjon; Vanskelig | Cervical Spine SurgeryKorea, Republikken
-
University of PittsburghTilbaketrukketPostoperativ smerte | Abdominal Body Contouring SurgeryForente stater
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityHar ikke rekruttert ennåPostoperativ smerte | Erector Spinae Plane Block i Spinal Surgery
-
University Health Network, TorontoTilbaketrukketAwake Craniotomy for Brain Tumor SurgeryCanada