Effectiveness of Prolonged Use of IUD/Implant for Contraception (EPIC)
調査の概要
詳細な説明
This prospective cohort study will evaluate 675 LNG-IUD users and 675 Etonogestrel (ENG) Implant users who are within 6 months of expiration or beyond the end of the FDA-approved duration. Participants will be contacted via telephone and either scheduled to enroll in person or be mailed the consent form before participation in the EPIC study. After the signed consent form is obtained, participants will also be asked to complete a brief telephone or in-person questionnaire on sociodemographic, medical and reproductive history, sexual and contraceptive history, history of unintended pregnancy and substance abuse. During the informed consent process, implant users will also be offered to participate in an arm of the study that will randomize them (if they consent) to either keeping their subdermal implant in or have it removed and replaced with a new subdermal implant. The randomized control trial subset allows us to compare effectiveness to that of a new implant.
It also allows us to assess "other contraceptive use" (e.g. condom use) in both groups.
Participants will also be asked if they are interested in providing a blood sample for analysis of etonogestrel assay levels at baseline enrollment and annually. If Follow-up phone interviews will occur every 6 months for 36 months beyond the expiration of their method. The investigators will attempt to validate all pregnancy outcomes with medical chart reviews.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis、Indiana、アメリカ、46202
- Indiana University
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis、Missouri、アメリカ、63110
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women age 18-45
- Within 6 months of expiration or beyond the end of the FDA-approved duration of use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD = 5 years) OR the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal implant (ENG implant = 3 years)
- Able to consent in English or Spanish.
- Not pregnant at the time of enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have history of female sterilization procedure
- Desire for conception in the next 12 months
- Not sexually active with a male partner
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
---|---|
実験的:Continued Use Implant Group
Woman randomly assigned to the continued use of their Etonogestrel Implant will continue to use their Etonogestrel Implant for contraception past FDA-approved duration of 36 months.
|
Subdermal arm implant
|
アクティブコンパレータ:New Implant Group
Woman randomly assigned to the new Etonogestrel Implant will have their existing Etonogestrel Implant removed and a new implant placed.
|
Subdermal arm implant
|
介入なし:Observational Continued Use Group
Women who refuse randomization will have an option of continuing to use their existing Etonogestrel Implant beyond the FDA-approved duration (36 months).
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
---|---|---|
Effectiveness
時間枠:Three years
|
Our primary aim is to test the absolute and relative effectiveness of both the LNG-IUD and the ENG implant in a non-inferiority (equivalence) study comparing failure rates of these methods in the 3 years post-FDA approved duration to the failure rates during the first three years.
|
Three years
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
---|---|---|
Unintended pregnancy rates
時間枠:Three years
|
The contraceptive failure (unintended pregnancy) rates for the LNG-IUD and ENG implant users at 12, 24, and 36 months (after FDA-approved duration of use: 5 years for LNG IUD and 3 years for the ENG implant) of the contraceptive method will be compared to those for CHC users.
|
Three years
|
Time to contraceptive failure
時間枠:Three years
|
we will use Kaplan-Meier curves to describe the distribution of time to contraceptive failure for the LNG-IUD and ENG implant users compared to combined hormonal contraceptive users (control).
|
Three years
|
Randomized trial analysis
時間枠:Three years
|
An identical analysis will be performed using the "intention-to-treat" principle (i.e.
analyze the participant according to the assigned group as determined by randomization).
|
Three years
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Jeffrey F Peipert, MD, PhD、Indiana University
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008. Vital Health Stat 23. 2010 Aug;(29):1-44.
- Trussell J, Lalla AM, Doan QV, Reyes E, Pinto L, Gricar J. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception. 2009 Jan;79(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Sep 25. Erratum In: Contraception. 2009 Aug;80(2):229-30.
- Huber J, Wenzl R. Pharmacokinetics of Implanon. An integrated analysis. Contraception. 1998 Dec;58(6 Suppl):85S-90S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00120-6. Erratum In: Contraception 1999 Feb;59(2):145.
- Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, Petrosky E, Madden T, Eisenberg D, Secura G. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1105-1113. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821188ad.
- Singh S, Sedgh G, Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Stud Fam Plann. 2010 Dec;41(4):241-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x.
- Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-9, 46.
- Goodman S, Hendlish SK, Benedict C, Reeves MF, Pera-Floyd M, Foster-Rosales A. Increasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion. Contraception. 2008 Aug;78(2):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
- ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1434-1438. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c6f965.
- Kiriwat O, Patanayindee A, Koetsawang S, Korver T, Bennink HJ. A 4-year pilot study on the efficacy and safety of Implanon, a single-rod hormonal contraceptive implant, in healthy women in Thailand. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1998 Jun;3(2):85-91. doi: 10.3109/13625189809051409.
- Trussell J. Update on the cost-effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception. 2010 Oct;82(4):391. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 May 18. No abstract available.
- Bahamondes L, Faundes A, Sobreira-Lima B, Lui-Filho JF, Pecci P, Matera S. TCu 380A IUD: a reversible permanent contraceptive method in women over 35 years of age. Contraception. 2005 Nov;72(5):337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.12.026. Epub 2005 Jul 18.
- Makarainen L, van Beek A, Tuomivaara L, Asplund B, Coelingh Bennink H. Ovarian function during the use of a single contraceptive implant: Implanon compared with Norplant. Fertil Steril. 1998 Apr;69(4):714-21. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00015-6.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 1603304047
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。
Etonogestrel Implantの臨床試験
-
Polares Medical SAPolares Medical, Inc.まだ募集していません
-
Seoul National University HospitalHansBiomed Co.,Ltd.積極的、募集していない
-
Polares Medical SAPolares Medical, Inc.まだ募集していません
-
Abbott Medical Devices完了