このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Predicting Death and ICU Admission in COVID-19 Patients in ED

Predicting ICU Admission and Death for COVID-19 Patients in the Emergency Department. Comparison of Five Scoring Systems.

INTRODUCTION. The novel coronavirus designated SARS-CoV-2, has determined an international outbreak of respiratory illness named Covid-19. Patients with Covid-19 present primarily with fever, myalgia or fatigue, and dry cough. Based on available data from 5% to 10% among hospitalized patients will require ICU admission.

In this context of overflow of critically ill patients, it is mandatory to establish clear and objective criteria to assess and predict a Covid-19 patient's need for ICU admission, and potentially predict death occurrence. Early Warning Scores (EWS) are used in hospitalized patients to predict clinical deterioration. Several study demonstrate the utility of EWS in ED to predict patient outcome.

AIM. The objective of this study is to evaluate five EWSs, to predict the need for ICU admission and the mortality in patients admitted in ED with COVID-19.

METHODS. This is a single-center, retrospective observational study. We will review the clinical records of all the patients consecutively admitted to our ED for Covid-19 over a three-weeks period (March 1 to 21, 2020). We will exclude from study cohort patients aged <18 years old and pregnant women, and patients already on oro-tracheal intubation at ED arrival. Based on clinical records five EWS will be calculated: NEWS, NEWS2, qSOFA, MEWS, REMS.

Study endpoints. The primary study endpoints will be death at 7 days, and need for ICU at 7 days, since ED admission. As secondary endpoints we will evaluate need for ICU and death at 24 and 48 hours since ED admission.

Statistical Analysis Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be used to evaluate the overall performance of the selected EWSs in predicting the defined adverse outcomes. According to Youden's index we will estimate the optimal cut-off points and corresponding sensitivity and specificity at selected score threshold values. The comparison between the ROC AUCs will be made according to DeLong method.

調査の概要

状態

完了

条件

詳細な説明

INTRODUCTION After the first cases identified in Wuhan city (China) on December 2019, the novel coronavirus designated SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global epidemic of respiratory illness named COVID-191. To date, more than, 3,000,000 cases have been reported worldwide, including more than 300,000 deaths.

Typical COVID-19 patients present with fever, myalgia or fatigue, and dry cough. Severe cases progress to severe dyspnoea and hypoxemia within one week after the onset of symptoms 3-5. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the prevalence of hypoxemic respiratory failure is around 20%, and more than 25% of them may require intensive care treatment.

The increasing number of COVID-19 cases has challenged the healthcare systems worldwide. Given the current overflow of critically ill patients in the Emergency Departments (EDs), an early identification of patients who need admittance to an intensive care unit (ICU) because of an increased risk of unfavourable outcome is necessary. Although general guidelines for ICU admission and triage exist, only limited guidance is available for the specific setting of COVID-19 patients.

In this context of overwhelming demand for medical assessment and triage in ED, early warning scores (EWS) may be useful. EWS are based on a rapid and quantitative assessment of changes in vital signs, and were developed to identify and track patients at risk of deterioration in non-critical areas of the hospital in order to ensure an early stabilisation and ICU transfer when appropriate and prevent avoidable cardiac arrest. However, in recent years these scores have been used in ED to predict ICU admission and mortality. Use of EWS has recently been proposed for the triage of COVID-19 patients in ED. However, their usefulness has not been demonstrated yet.

METHODS Study design This is a retrospective observational study conducted in the ED of the largest urban teaching hospital in Rome, a referral center for COVID-19 in central Italy. The participants reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) of all adults (>18y) patients admitted to ED for suspected COVID-19 over three consecutive weeks from March 1 to March 21, 2020, tested for COVID-19 according to the WHO interim guidance.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria Study will include only patients whose diagnosis is confirmed with real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay of nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens.

Will be excluded from the study cohort pregnant women, patients discharged from ED with normal chest x-ray findings, and patients who were already mechanically ventilated on ED arrival. For patients with more than one access to our ED, only the latest access will be included in the analysis.

Study variables The following information will be extracted from digital clinical records: age, sex, clinical history and presentation, temperature, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), arterial blood pressure (BP), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, oxygen therapy, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and chest x-ray findings.Clinical signs, including SpO2, will be assessed on arrival at the ED. National Early Warning Score (NEWS), National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), Quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) will be calculated for each patient. For NEWS2 calculation, patient will be considered at risk of type 2 respiratory failure if had a confirmed history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Study endpoints The primary study endpoints considered will be death or ICU admission within 7 days from arrival at the ED. Secondary endpoints will be death or ICU admission within 24 and 48 hours from ED arrival.

Criteria for ICU admission The criteria for ICU admission of COVID-19 patients in include need for invasive respiratory support, or extra-pulmonary organ failure such as circulatory shock requiring vasopressors, or renal failure. These criteria are expected to be consistent throughout the study period.

Statistical Analysis and sample size Continuous variables will be reported as median [interquartile range], and will be compared at univariate analysis by Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables will be reported as absolute number (percentage), and will be compared by Chi-square test (with Fisher's test if appropriate).

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be used to estimate the overall performance of the evaluated scores in predicting the defined adverse outcomes. For each score threshold values will be calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR). The Youden index will be used to estimate the optimal cut-off points for sensitivity and specificity. The comparison between the ROC AUCs will be made according to DeLong method. A p value ≤ 0.05 will be regarded as significant. Data will be analyzed by IBM SPSS statistics v25® (IBM, IL, USA).

Sample size. For a correct estimation of ROC Curve a minimum of 50 patients for each endpoint should be included in the analysis. Given the estimate flow of at least 300 COVID-19 confirmed patients in the study period, and the actual rate of ICU admission in these patients (about 20%), the sample should be adequate for statistical estimation.

Aim of the study The objective of the present study is to assess the ability of EWS to predict ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department.

Ethical considerations All the patients accessing the "COVID" ED signs a comprehensive ethical agreement for collection of blood samples and clinical data, for bio-bank and research purposes (Informative mod 147 25/06/2019).

研究の種類

観察的

入学 (実際)

300

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • RM
      • Roma、RM、イタリア、0068
        • Marcello Covino

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

サンプリング方法

非確率サンプル

調査対象母集団

Consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to ED

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • COVID 19 confirmed patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <18 years
  • Pregnant women
  • Asymptomatic and normal x-ray findings subjects

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
7-day death
時間枠:7 day
Death by seven day from ED access
7 day
7-day ICU
時間枠:7 day
Admission to ICU by seven day from ED access
7 day

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

捜査官

  • スタディチェア:Francesco Franceschi, MD PhD、Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

一般刊行物

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2020年3月1日

一次修了 (実際)

2020年3月31日

研究の完了 (実際)

2020年4月15日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2020年4月30日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2020年4月30日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2020年5月1日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2020年5月5日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2020年5月1日

最終確認日

2020年4月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • 0017055/20

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

COVIDの臨床試験

3
購読する