此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Predicting Death and ICU Admission in COVID-19 Patients in ED

Predicting ICU Admission and Death for COVID-19 Patients in the Emergency Department. Comparison of Five Scoring Systems.

INTRODUCTION. The novel coronavirus designated SARS-CoV-2, has determined an international outbreak of respiratory illness named Covid-19. Patients with Covid-19 present primarily with fever, myalgia or fatigue, and dry cough. Based on available data from 5% to 10% among hospitalized patients will require ICU admission.

In this context of overflow of critically ill patients, it is mandatory to establish clear and objective criteria to assess and predict a Covid-19 patient's need for ICU admission, and potentially predict death occurrence. Early Warning Scores (EWS) are used in hospitalized patients to predict clinical deterioration. Several study demonstrate the utility of EWS in ED to predict patient outcome.

AIM. The objective of this study is to evaluate five EWSs, to predict the need for ICU admission and the mortality in patients admitted in ED with COVID-19.

METHODS. This is a single-center, retrospective observational study. We will review the clinical records of all the patients consecutively admitted to our ED for Covid-19 over a three-weeks period (March 1 to 21, 2020). We will exclude from study cohort patients aged <18 years old and pregnant women, and patients already on oro-tracheal intubation at ED arrival. Based on clinical records five EWS will be calculated: NEWS, NEWS2, qSOFA, MEWS, REMS.

Study endpoints. The primary study endpoints will be death at 7 days, and need for ICU at 7 days, since ED admission. As secondary endpoints we will evaluate need for ICU and death at 24 and 48 hours since ED admission.

Statistical Analysis Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be used to evaluate the overall performance of the selected EWSs in predicting the defined adverse outcomes. According to Youden's index we will estimate the optimal cut-off points and corresponding sensitivity and specificity at selected score threshold values. The comparison between the ROC AUCs will be made according to DeLong method.

研究概览

地位

完全的

详细说明

INTRODUCTION After the first cases identified in Wuhan city (China) on December 2019, the novel coronavirus designated SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global epidemic of respiratory illness named COVID-191. To date, more than, 3,000,000 cases have been reported worldwide, including more than 300,000 deaths.

Typical COVID-19 patients present with fever, myalgia or fatigue, and dry cough. Severe cases progress to severe dyspnoea and hypoxemia within one week after the onset of symptoms 3-5. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the prevalence of hypoxemic respiratory failure is around 20%, and more than 25% of them may require intensive care treatment.

The increasing number of COVID-19 cases has challenged the healthcare systems worldwide. Given the current overflow of critically ill patients in the Emergency Departments (EDs), an early identification of patients who need admittance to an intensive care unit (ICU) because of an increased risk of unfavourable outcome is necessary. Although general guidelines for ICU admission and triage exist, only limited guidance is available for the specific setting of COVID-19 patients.

In this context of overwhelming demand for medical assessment and triage in ED, early warning scores (EWS) may be useful. EWS are based on a rapid and quantitative assessment of changes in vital signs, and were developed to identify and track patients at risk of deterioration in non-critical areas of the hospital in order to ensure an early stabilisation and ICU transfer when appropriate and prevent avoidable cardiac arrest. However, in recent years these scores have been used in ED to predict ICU admission and mortality. Use of EWS has recently been proposed for the triage of COVID-19 patients in ED. However, their usefulness has not been demonstrated yet.

METHODS Study design This is a retrospective observational study conducted in the ED of the largest urban teaching hospital in Rome, a referral center for COVID-19 in central Italy. The participants reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) of all adults (>18y) patients admitted to ED for suspected COVID-19 over three consecutive weeks from March 1 to March 21, 2020, tested for COVID-19 according to the WHO interim guidance.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria Study will include only patients whose diagnosis is confirmed with real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction assay of nasal and pharyngeal swab specimens.

Will be excluded from the study cohort pregnant women, patients discharged from ED with normal chest x-ray findings, and patients who were already mechanically ventilated on ED arrival. For patients with more than one access to our ED, only the latest access will be included in the analysis.

Study variables The following information will be extracted from digital clinical records: age, sex, clinical history and presentation, temperature, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), arterial blood pressure (BP), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, oxygen therapy, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and chest x-ray findings.Clinical signs, including SpO2, will be assessed on arrival at the ED. National Early Warning Score (NEWS), National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), Quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) will be calculated for each patient. For NEWS2 calculation, patient will be considered at risk of type 2 respiratory failure if had a confirmed history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Study endpoints The primary study endpoints considered will be death or ICU admission within 7 days from arrival at the ED. Secondary endpoints will be death or ICU admission within 24 and 48 hours from ED arrival.

Criteria for ICU admission The criteria for ICU admission of COVID-19 patients in include need for invasive respiratory support, or extra-pulmonary organ failure such as circulatory shock requiring vasopressors, or renal failure. These criteria are expected to be consistent throughout the study period.

Statistical Analysis and sample size Continuous variables will be reported as median [interquartile range], and will be compared at univariate analysis by Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables will be reported as absolute number (percentage), and will be compared by Chi-square test (with Fisher's test if appropriate).

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be used to estimate the overall performance of the evaluated scores in predicting the defined adverse outcomes. For each score threshold values will be calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR). The Youden index will be used to estimate the optimal cut-off points for sensitivity and specificity. The comparison between the ROC AUCs will be made according to DeLong method. A p value ≤ 0.05 will be regarded as significant. Data will be analyzed by IBM SPSS statistics v25® (IBM, IL, USA).

Sample size. For a correct estimation of ROC Curve a minimum of 50 patients for each endpoint should be included in the analysis. Given the estimate flow of at least 300 COVID-19 confirmed patients in the study period, and the actual rate of ICU admission in these patients (about 20%), the sample should be adequate for statistical estimation.

Aim of the study The objective of the present study is to assess the ability of EWS to predict ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19 patients in the emergency department.

Ethical considerations All the patients accessing the "COVID" ED signs a comprehensive ethical agreement for collection of blood samples and clinical data, for bio-bank and research purposes (Informative mod 147 25/06/2019).

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

300

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • RM
      • Roma、RM、意大利、0068
        • Marcello Covino

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to ED

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • COVID 19 confirmed patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <18 years
  • Pregnant women
  • Asymptomatic and normal x-ray findings subjects

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
7-day death
大体时间:7 day
Death by seven day from ED access
7 day
7-day ICU
大体时间:7 day
Admission to ICU by seven day from ED access
7 day

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 学习椅:Francesco Franceschi, MD PhD、Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2020年3月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2020年3月31日

研究完成 (实际的)

2020年4月15日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2020年4月30日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2020年4月30日

首次发布 (实际的)

2020年5月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2020年5月5日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2020年5月1日

最后验证

2020年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 0017055/20

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

冠状病毒病的临床试验

3
订阅