Implementatie van veelzijdige patiëntgerichte behandelstrategieën voor intensieve bloeddrukcontrole om cognitieve achteruitgang te minimaliseren (IMPACTS-MIND)
Effectiviteit van het implementeren van een intensieve bloeddrukverlagende interventie bij cognitieve achteruitgang bij patiënten met lage inkomens en minderheidshypertensie
The study will test a multifaceted strategy for implementing an intensive blood pressure intervention protocol targeting systolic BP <120 mmHg on cognitive decline in racial minority and low-income hypertensive patients in primary care. The proposed study will generate urgently needed data on effective, adoptable, and equitable intervention strategies to reduce blood pressure-related cognitive decline in low- income and minority populations. If proven effective, the implementation strategy for intensive blood pressure reduction could be adapted and scaled up in diverse primary care settings to prevent cognitive decline and clinical dementia.
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Toestand
Conditie
Conditie
Interventie / Behandeling
Interventie / Behandeling
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
African American and low-income populations bear a disproportionate burden of dementia and have been underrepresented in trials of cognitive impairment. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) showed that an intensive blood pressure (BP) intervention (target systolic BP <120 mmHg) lowered the risk of cognitive impairment compared to a standard BP intervention (systolic BP target <140 mmHg). The next important step is to determine how the successful SPRINT intensive blood pressure intervention can be implemented in a real-world clinic setting to prevent cognitive decline. The overall objective of the proposed study is to test a multifaceted strategy for implementing an intensive BP intervention protocol adapted from SPRINT targeting systolic BP <120 mmHg on cognitive decline in racial minority and low-income hypertensive patients in resource-constrained primary care practices in Louisiana and Mississippi. The RE-AIM (Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance) framework has been used to guide the development and evaluation of the multifaceted implementation strategy, including protocol-based treatment that employs the SPRINT stepped-care intensive BP management algorithm, dissemination of SPRINT findings, shared- decision making, team-based collaborative care, BP audit and feedback, home BP monitoring, and patient health coaching. Building on the ongoing Implementation of Multifaceted Patient-Centered Treatment Strategies for Intensive Blood Pressure Control (IMPACTS-BP) trial, the investigators will cost-effectively conduct a cluster- randomized trial in 40 primary care clinics that serve low-income populations in Louisiana and Mississippi. The primary outcome in the proposed trial is the net difference in mean change of global cognitive composite z-score from baseline to an average of 36 months between the intervention and enhanced usual care groups. Secondary outcomes include net difference in mean change of executive function and memory composite z-scores, systolic and diastolic BP, adverse effects, and quality of life. Implementation outcomes, including acceptability, adaptation, adoption, feasibility, fidelity, penetrance, and cost-effectiveness, will also be collected and used to improve intervention delivery during the trial. The proposed trial, with a sample size of 40 clinics (31.5 patients/clinic), has 93% statistical power to detect a 0.30 or higher difference in the global cognitive composite z-score at a 2-sided significance level of 0.05 assuming 20% loss to follow-up and an intra-cluster correlation of 0.05. In a meta-analysis of 5 clinical trials, the pooled effect size was 0.35 (95% CI 0.32, 0.38) for the global cognitive composite z-score. This study will generate urgently needed data on effective, adoptable, and equitable intervention strategies to reduce blood pressure-related cognitive decline in low-income and minority populations. If proven effective, the implementation strategy for intensive blood pressure reduction could be adapted and scaled up in diverse primary care settings to prevent cognitive decline and clinical dementia.
Studietype
Studietype
Inschrijving (Werkelijk)
Inschrijving
Fase
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
Studie Locaties
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, Verenigde Staten, 70112
- Tulane University
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria for Primary Care Clinics
- Predominantly managing underserved populations with health disparities (ethnic minorities, low-income groups, and residents of rural areas and inner cities).
- Having electronic medical record systems.
- Serving >200 hypertension patients (ICD-10-CM I10-I15) during the previous year.
- Not participating in other hypertension control programs
- Not sharing providers or nurses/pharmacists with other participating clinics.
Inclusion Criteria for Study Participants
- Men or women aged ≥40 years (2/3 of participants ≥60 years) who receive primary care from participating clinics.
- Systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg at two screening visits for those not taking antihypertensive medication or systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg at two screening visits for those taking antihypertensive medications
- Pregnant women, women planning to become pregnant in the near future, women of childbearing potential and not practicing birth control, and persons who cannot give informed consent will be excluded.
- No diagnosis of dementia at baseline
- Baseline MoCA score ≥ 10.
- No diagnosis of end-stage renal disease, defined as dialysis or transplantation
- Speak English as first language
- No plans to change to a primary healthcare provider outside of their clinic in the near future
- No individuals unlikely to complete the study, such as those who plan to move out of the study area in the near future and temporary migrant and homeless people
- No immediate family members are staff at their clinic
Studie plan
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Preventie
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
- Masker: Geen (open label)
Aantal wapens
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / ArmDeelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / BehandelingInterventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Experimenteel: Intervention
The core component of the intervention is protocol-based treatment using the SPRINT intensive BP management algorithm. Implementation strategies include dissemination of SPRINT study findings, team-based collaborative care and shared-decision making, blood pressure audit and feedback, home blood pressure monitoring, and health coaching. |
The core component of the intervention is protocol-based treatment using the SPRINT intensive BP management algorithm. Implementation strategies include dissemination of SPRINT study findings, team-based collaborative care and shared-decision making, blood pressure audit and feedback, home blood pressure monitoring, and health coaching. |
|
Geen tussenkomst: Enhanced Usual Care
Enhanced usual care will include an education session on the ACC/AHA hypertension guideline to providers and proper BP measurement to providers and staff at enhanced usual care clinics.Otherwise, no active intervention will take place, and all usual care clinics will follow their routine clinic practice. |
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Net difference in mean change in cognitive decline
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
The net difference in mean change of global cognitive composite z-score over an average 36 months between intervention and enhanced usual care groups |
Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Net difference in mean change in MoCA score
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Difference between the intervention and usual care group in mean change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) over an average 36 months. |
Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
|
Net difference in mean change in executive function
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Difference between the intervention and usual care group in mean change in executive function composite z-score (calculated from average of z-scores from individual tests: DSC, Trails A & B, DST, Category Fluency) over an average 36 months. |
Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
|
Net difference in mean change in memory function
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Difference between the intervention and usual care group in mean change in memory composite z-score (calculated from average of z-scores from individual tests: MoCA immediate & delayed word recall, HVLT-R immediate recall) over an average 36 months. |
Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
|
Net difference in mean change in systolic blood pressure
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Difference between the intervention and usual care group in mean change in systolic blood pressure over an average 36 months. |
Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
|
Net difference in mean change in diastolic blood pressure
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Difference between the intervention and usual care group in mean change in diastolic blood pressure over an average 36 months. |
Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Andere uitkomstmaten
Andere uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Side effects
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Difference between the intervention and usual care group in frequency of side effects (collected via detailed questionnaire) over an average 36 months. |
Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Difference between the intervention and usual care group in mean change in health-related quality of life (measured using the 12-Item Short Form Survey) over an average 36 months. |
Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
|
Difference in proportion of patients with adjudicated mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or probable dementia (exploratory outcome)
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Difference in adjudicated MCI and probable dementia at the termination visit between the intervention and usual care group. Based on pre-defined MoCA cutpoints, suspected cases of dementia/MCI will be randomly assigned to two adjudicators, blinded to treatment assignment, with expertise in dementia for review. Data used in the adjudication will include all available cognitive test data, functional assessment, and additional data including demographic information and medical records. |
Baseline to an average of 36 months
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Sponsor
Sponsor
Medewerkers
Medewerkers
Onderzoekers
Onderzoekers
- Hoofdonderzoeker: Katherine T Mills, PhD, Tulane University
- Hoofdonderzoeker: Jeff D Williamson, MD, Wake Forest University
- Hoofdonderzoeker: Jiang He, MD, PhD, Tulane University
Studie record data
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start (Werkelijk)
Studie start
Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)
Primaire voltooiing
Studie voltooiing (Geschat)
Studie voltooiing
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Eerst geplaatst
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Laatste update geplaatst
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatst geverifieerd
Laatst geverifieerd
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- R61AG068481 (Subsidie/contract van de Amerikaanse NIH)
- R33AG068481 (Subsidie/contract van de Amerikaanse NIH)
Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)
Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?
Beschrijving IPD-plan
Our study data sharing plan will comply with all NIH policies for data sharing. Data sharing will be executed through the centralized NIH data repository and will be implemented in a timely manner. Data will be prepared by the Study Data Coordinating Center and sent to the study's NIA Program Official for review prior to release. These data will be free of identifiers that allow identification of individual research participants either directly or through "deductive disclosure." In addition, the investigators will offer, through our public access website, opportunities for outside investigators to collaborate with us using complete study data.
At the completion of the project, the investigators will make all intervention materials and procedure manuals available to the public according to the approved plan for making data and materials available to the scientific community, lay public, and the NIH.
IPD-tijdsbestek voor delen
Study data, including data from baseline and follow-up visits, will be prepared for transmission to the NIH data repository no later than 3 years after the end of the final patient follow-up or 2 years after the main paper of the trial has been published, whichever comes first.
IPD delen Ondersteunend informatietype
- LEERPROTOCOOL
Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .