- ICH GCP
- Rejestr badań klinicznych w USA
- Badanie kliniczne NCT03339362
FAcet-joint Injection Clinical and Cost-effective Trial (FACET)
A Multicentre Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Clinical- and Cost-effectiveness of Facet-joint Injections in Selected Patients With Non-specific Low Back Pain: a Feasibility Study
Lumbar facet-joints are small, paired joints in the low back that provide stability, integrity and flexibility of movement to the spine. Diseased facet-joints may cause persistent low back pain, with significant socioeconomic impact. At present, there is insufficient high quality evidence to support the use of lumbar facet-joint injections (FJIs) in treating low back pain of less than 12 months' duration; the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) therefore did not approved their use in their 2009 publication.
This study will investigate the feasibility of conducting a larger, definitive trial to assess lumbar FJIs (a needle is inserted into the facet-joint and steroid injected), by comparing it to a dummy or 'sham' procedure (a needle is inserted near the facet-joint but no therapeutic substance injected).
Patients with persistent low back pain, referred to a community or hospital-based pain, spinal or musculoskeletal clinic by their general practitioner, will be reviewed and assessed by a specialist physician. They will be screened and recruited based on clinical history and examination. Participants will receive diagnostic injections (medial branch nerve blocks); those with a positive response will randomly receive either FJIs or a sham procedure, under x-ray guidance. All participants will receive a combined physical and psychological programme recommended by NICE as a strategy to reduce pain and its impact on the person's day-to-day life, even if the pain cannot be cured completely.
Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires comparing a range of pain and disability-related issues. These will occur at baseline (before treatment) and at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after their injections.
Criteria for the study to be considered successful (and a definitive trial feasible) include the abilities to standardise the methods for injection and to recruit and retain sufficient participants, and the acceptability of the study design to participants and clinicians.
Przegląd badań
Status
Warunki
Interwencja / Leczenie
Szczegółowy opis
Design
This study seeks to examine the feasibility of undertaking a fully powered double-blind randomised controlled trial. Patients with non-specific low back pain of more than three months' duration with confirmed facet-joint disease will be individually randomised 1:1 to receive facet-joint injections plus a combined physical and psychological programme (intervention group) or to a sham (placebo) procedure plus a combined physical and psychological programme (control group).
Setting
The feasibility study will be conducted in three hospital-based pain medicine centres: Barts Health NHS Trust (formerly Barts and The London NHS Trust), Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust.
Target population
Patients will be recruited from pain, spinal and musculoskeletal clinics at the three participating NHS centres and their associated community clinics. Patients will be referred by their general practitioners with low back pain requiring further specialist assessment, for reasons such as uncertain diagnosis, failure of conservative treatment, or expectation of therapeutic interventions. A screening visit will be used to identify eligible patients i.e. pain of at least 3 months' duration and an average pain intensity numerical rating score (NRS) of at least 4/10 in the 7 preceding days, signs and symptoms of facet-joint disease including bilateral localised paraspinal tenderness at 2 lumbar levels, and have received two components of NICE-defined best non-invasive care (education and one of: physical exercise programme, acupuncture, or manual therapy).
Health technologies being assessed
Facet-joint injections of local anaesthetic and steroid for non-specific low back pain. (Delivered in this study as four X-ray guided intra-articular facet-joint injections through a spinal needle at two lumbar levels bilaterally, using 0.5ml 0.5% bupivacaine + 20mg methylprednisolone per joint, under fluoroscopic guidance.)
Measurement of costs and outcomes
The primary outcomes for this feasibility study include: patient recruitment and attrition rates, levels of patient completion of outcomes, acceptability of the study design to patients and clinicians, fidelity of sham injection and process of blinding, and collection of variance outcome data to inform a future sample size calculation.
The investigators have proposed stopping rules for progression to a main trial. The proposed outcomes for the main trial have been selected in accord with IMMPACT recommendations for chronic pain trials and include: pain assessment, psychological well-being, health-related quality of life, functional disability, health care utilisation including analgesic usage, lost productivity and complications/level of adverse events. Outcomes will be collected at clinic visits at baseline (pre-randomisation) and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-randomisation.
Sample size
The investigators will recruit a total of 150 patients who will undergo a diagnostic facet-joint injection to determine eligibility to participate (test positive for facet-joint disease). Sixty participants (40% of all recruited) are expected to have a positive response to the diagnostic test; these 60 patients will be randomly and equally allocated to intervention and control groups. Assuming up to a 33% attrition rate, the investigators will have >24 complete data sets per arm at the end of the study. This sample size will allow us to achieve our various feasibility objectives.
Project timetables including recruitment rate
A retrospective audit of patient throughput in participating clinics shows that recruitment to achieve 30 patients per treatment arm is readily feasible in the time frame of this study. From 1000 new patient attendances for low back pain at the pain services, the investigators expect approximately 1 in 4 patients to be eligible to enter the study. This is based on our clinical experience and published studies based on responses to controlled diagnostic facet-joint injections, performed in accordance with the criteria established by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Of these 250 patients, approximately 60% (150) will consent to enter the study, of whom approximately 40% (60 patients) are expected to have a positive response from diagnostic medial branch nerve blocks.
The investigators anticipate that the project will take a total of 21 months to complete.
Typ studiów
Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)
Faza
- Faza 4
Kontakty i lokalizacje
Lokalizacje studiów
-
-
-
Liverpool, Zjednoczone Królestwo, L9 7LJ
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust
-
London, Zjednoczone Królestwo, EC1A 7BE
- Barts Health NHS Trust
-
-
Essex
-
Basildon, Essex, Zjednoczone Królestwo, SS16 5NL
- Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Kryteria uczestnictwa
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Wiek uprawniający do nauki
Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników
Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki
Opis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18 to 70 years attending pain clinics identified during routine clinical assessment of non-specific low back pain (clinical indicators for pain of facet-joint origin include tenderness over the facet-joints, referred leg pain above the knees, and worsening pain on extension, flexion and rotation).
- Low back pain of greater than three months' duration.
- Average pain intensity score of 4/10 or more in the seven days preceding recruitment despite NICE-recommended treatment (NICE recommends providing patients with advice and information to promote self-management of their low back pain, and offering one of the following treatments, taking into account patient preference: an exercise programme, a course of manual therapy, or a course of acupuncture).
- Dominantly paraspinal (not midline) tenderness at two bilateral lumbar levels.
- At least two components of NICE-recommended best non-invasive care completed, including education and one of a physical exercise programme, acupuncture, and manual therapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient refusal.
- More than four painful lumbar facet-joints.
- Patient has not completed at least two components of NICE-recommended best non-invasive care.
- 'Red flag' signs ('Red flag' signs are possible indicators of serious spinal pathology, and include thoracic pain, fever, unexplained weight loss, bladder or bowel dysfunction, progressive neurological deficit, and saddle anaesthesia).
- Hypersensitivity to study medications or X-ray contrast medium.
- Radicular pain (Radicular pain is defined as pain perceived as arising in a limb or the trunk wall caused by ectopic activation of nociceptive afferent fibres in a spinal nerve or its roots or other neuropathic mechanisms. The pain is lancinating in quality and travels along a narrow band).
- Dominantly midline tenderness over the lumbar spine.
- Any other dominant pain.
- Any major systemic disease or mental health illness that may affect the patient's pain, disability and/or their ability to exercise and rehabilitate.
- Any active neoplastic disease, including primary or secondary neoplasm.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
- Previous lumbar facet-joint injections.
- Previous lumbar spinal surgery.
- Patients with morbid obesity (body mass index of 35 or greater).
- Major trauma or infection to the lumbar spine.
- Participation in another clinical trial in the past thirty days.
- Patients unable to commit to the six-month study duration.
- Patients involved in legal actions or employment or benefit tribunals related to their low back pain.
- Patients with a history of substance abuse.
Plan studiów
Jak projektuje się badanie?
Szczegóły projektu
- Główny cel: Inny
- Przydział: Randomizowane
- Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
- Maskowanie: Podwójnie
Broń i interwencje
Grupa uczestników / Arm |
Interwencja / Leczenie |
|---|---|
|
Aktywny komparator: Active Procedure
All patients will receive 6 X-ray guided peri-articular injections via a spinal needle at 2 bilateral lumbar levels using 0.5ml of 1% Lidocaine. This a test procedure to identify the patient has a 50% pain reduction from baseline pain numerical score. If patients pass this test injection, they will be randomised to the active or sham procedure. 4 X-ray guided intra-articular facet-joint injections via a spinal needle at 2 bilateral lumbar levels, using 0.5ml 0.5% bupivacaine + 20mg methylprednisolone per joint |
If they pass the diagnostic injection with a 50% or more in pain reduction, they are randomised to receive either the active procedure or sham procedure. Active: 4 X-ray guided intra-articular lumbar facet-joint injections via a spinal needle at 2 bilateral lumbar levels using 0.5ml bupivacaine + 20mg methylprednisolone per joint
Inne nazwy:
|
|
Pozorny komparator: Sham procedure
All patients will receive 6 X-ray guided peri-articular injections via a spinal needle at 2 bilateral lumbar levels using 0.5ml of 1% Lidocaine. This a test procedure to identify the patient has a 50% pain reduction from baseline pain numerical score. If patients pass this test injection, they will be randomised to the active or sham procedure. 4 X-ray guided peri-articular injections via a spinal needle at 2 bilateral lumbar levels using 0.5ml normal saline per injection |
If they pass the diagnostic injection with a 50% or more in pain reduction, they are randomised to receive either the active procedure or sham procedure. Sham: 4 X-ray guided peri-articular injections via a spinal needle at 2 bilateral lumbar levels using 0.5ml of 0.9% sodium chloride per joint.
Inne nazwy:
|
Co mierzy badanie?
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain numerical rating scale (NRS)
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (visit 1) and diagnostic injections (visit 2)
|
The rationale for carrying out diagnostic medial branch nerve blocks is because of their safety, simplicity and prognostic value. There is currently no justification for double, comparative blocks as these are associated with a significant false-negative rate and are not shown to be cost-effective. The pain scores at baseline (recruitment) will be recorded using a numerical rating scale (0-10) and will be compared to the score taken 20-40 minutes and 180-200 minutes after the injections. If a positive response of 50% pain reduction is seen, we know the pain is definately coming from the facet- joint which entitles the patient to be eligible for the randomised procedure. |
Baseline (visit 1) and diagnostic injections (visit 2)
|
Miary wyników drugorzędnych
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain intensity and characteristics: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) (Short Form) Modified, with its 11-point NRS Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire.
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (visit 1)
|
Pain assessments to assess change in outcome measure in the form of questionnaires.
|
Baseline (visit 1)
|
|
Change in Pain intensity and characteristics: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) (Short Form) Modified, with its 11-point NRS Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire.
Ramy czasowe: 6 weeks (visit 4)
|
Pain assessments to assess change in outcome measure in the form of questionnaires.
This will be compared with responses from the baseline visit.
|
6 weeks (visit 4)
|
|
Change in Pain intensity and characteristics: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) (Short Form) Modified, with its 11-point NRS Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire.
Ramy czasowe: 3 months (visit 5)
|
Pain assessments to assess change in outcome measure in the form of questionnaires.
This will be compared with responses from the baseline visit.
|
3 months (visit 5)
|
|
Change in Pain intensity and characteristics: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) (Short Form) Modified, with its 11-point NRS Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire.
Ramy czasowe: 6 months (visit 6)
|
Pain assessments to assess change in outcome measure in the form of questionnaires.
This will be compared with responses from the baseline visit.
|
6 months (visit 6)
|
|
Expectation of benefit
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
|
0 to 6 scale, ranging from "expect no improvement" to "expect total improvement".
|
Baseline
|
|
Change in Health-related quality of life: EQ5D-5L, 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) at different follow- up visits
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (visit 1), 6 weeks (visit 4), 3 months (visit 5) and 6 months (visit 6)
|
Pain assessments to assess change in outcome measure in the form of questionnaires.
|
Baseline (visit 1), 6 weeks (visit 4), 3 months (visit 5) and 6 months (visit 6)
|
|
Change in Functional impairment: Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) at different follow-up visits
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (visit 1)
|
Pain assessments to assess change in outcome measure in the form of questionnaires.
|
Baseline (visit 1)
|
|
Change in Co-psychological well-being: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, SF-12, BPI at different follow up visits
Ramy czasowe: 6 weeks (visit 4)
|
Pain assessments to assess change in outcome measure in the form of questionnaires.This will be compared with responses from the baseline visit.
|
6 weeks (visit 4)
|
|
Change in Co-psychological well-being: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, SF-12, BPI at different follow up visits
Ramy czasowe: 3 months (visit 5)
|
Pain assessments to assess change in outcome measure in the form of questionnaires.This will be compared with responses from the baseline visit.
|
3 months (visit 5)
|
|
Change in Co-psychological well-being: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, SF-12, BPI at different follow up visits
Ramy czasowe: 6 months (visit 6)
|
Pain assessments to assess change in outcome measure in the form of questionnaires.This will be compared with responses from the baseline visit.
|
6 months (visit 6)
|
|
Change in Healthcare utilisation and costs, and impact on productivity at different follow up visits
Ramy czasowe: Baseline (visit 1)
|
This will include the use if published national costs to calculate costs of delivering each treatment arm/intervention and downstream healthcare utilization.
The tools to assess this are the Stanford Presenteeism Scale 6, self-reported measures of sickness absence over the previous 3 months, and healthcare utilisation in the form of hospital visits, treatments and medications.
|
Baseline (visit 1)
|
|
Change in Healthcare utilisation and costs, and impact on productivity at different follow up visits
Ramy czasowe: 6 weeks (visit 4)
|
This will include the use if published national costs to calculate costs of delivering each treatment arm/intervention and downstream healthcare utilization.
The tools to assess this are the Stanford Presenteeism Scale 6, self-reported measures of sickness absence over the previous 3 months, and healthcare utilisation in the form of hospital visits, treatments and medications.This will be compared with responses from the baseline visit.
|
6 weeks (visit 4)
|
|
Change in Healthcare utilisation and costs, and impact on productivity at different follow up visits
Ramy czasowe: 3 months (visit 5)
|
This will include the use if published national costs to calculate costs of delivering each treatment arm/intervention and downstream healthcare utilization.
The tools to assess this are the Stanford Presenteeism Scale 6, self-reported measures of sickness absence over the previous 3 months, and healthcare utilisation in the form of hospital visits, treatments and medications.This will be compared with responses from the baseline visit.
|
3 months (visit 5)
|
|
Change in Healthcare utilisation and costs, and impact on productivity at different follow up visits
Ramy czasowe: 6 months (visit 6)
|
This will include the use if published national costs to calculate costs of delivering each treatment arm/intervention and downstream healthcare utilization.
The tools to assess this are the Stanford Presenteeism Scale 6, self-reported measures of sickness absence over the previous 3 months, and healthcare utilisation in the form of hospital visits, treatments and medications.This will be compared with responses from the baseline visit.
|
6 months (visit 6)
|
Współpracownicy i badacze
Sponsor
Współpracownicy
Śledczy
- Dyrektor Studium: Vivek Mehta, MBBS, Barts & The London NHS Trust
Daty zapisu na studia
Główne daty studiów
Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)
Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)
Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)
Daty rejestracji na studia
Pierwszy przesłany
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)
Aktualizacje rekordów badań
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
Ostatnia weryfikacja
Więcej informacji
Terminy związane z tym badaniem
Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH
- Ból
- Objawy neurologiczne
- Ból pleców
- Bóle krzyża
- Fizjologiczne skutki leków
- Depresanty ośrodkowego układu nerwowego
- Agenci autonomiczni
- Agenty obwodowego układu nerwowego
- Agenci systemu sensorycznego
- Środki znieczulające
- Środki przeciwzapalne
- Leki przeciwwymiotne
- Środki żołądkowo-jelitowe
- Glikokortykosteroidy
- Hormony
- Hormony, substytuty hormonów i antagoniści hormonów
- Środki neuroprotekcyjne
- Środki ochronne
- Środki znieczulające, miejscowe
- Octan metyloprednizolonu
- Metyloprednizolon
- Bupiwakaina
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
- Facet-joint feasibility study
Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)
Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?
Opis planu IPD
Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .
Badania kliniczne na Bóle krzyża
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaRekrutacyjnyPasellofemoral Pain, PFPTurcja (Türkiye)
-
Fudan UniversityJeszcze nie rekrutacjaRak Piersi Z Przerzutami Do Mózgu | Rak piersi z ekspresją HER2-lowChiny
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationNieznanyWpływ diety Low FODMAP w porównaniu z dietą bezglutenową na objawy IBS u dzieciIzrael
-
Beijing Sport UniversityJeszcze nie rekrutacjaPasellofemoral Pain, PFP
-
Beijing Sport UniversityJeszcze nie rekrutacja
-
Pamukkale UniversityJeszcze nie rekrutacjaPasellofemoral Pain, PFPTurcja (Türkiye)
-
Beijing Sport UniversityZakończony
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)ZakończonyZespół bólu rzepkowo-udowego | Ból rzepkowo-udowy (PFPS) | Ból rzepkowo-udowy | Pasellofemoral Pain, PFPStany Zjednoczone
-
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2Nanox International Laboratory (Belgique)ZakończonySkuteczność i tolerancja B-Back® na syndrom wypalenia zawodowegoFrancja
-
Daiichi Sankyo Europe, GmbH, a Daiichi Sankyo CompanyRekrutacyjnyRak piersi z przerzutami | Nieoperacyjny rak piersi | Rak piersi z ekspresją HER2-lowWłochy, Hiszpania, Francja, Dania, Austria, Belgia, Szwecja, Norwegia, Szwajcaria, Portugalia
Badania kliniczne na Active Procedure
-
Radicle ScienceJeszcze nie rekrutacjaUwodnienieStany Zjednoczone
-
Auburn UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Society of Addiction PsychologyRekrutacyjnyZaburzenie używania konopi indyjskich, ciężkieStany Zjednoczone
-
Radicle ScienceZakończonyZmęczenieStany Zjednoczone
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute of General Medical Sciences...ZakończonyCovid19 | KoronawirusStany Zjednoczone
-
Radicle ScienceZakończonyZmęczenieStany Zjednoczone
-
Radicle ScienceZakończony
-
Radicle ScienceZakończonyDepresja | Ból | Spać | LękStany Zjednoczone
-
BBraun Medical SASZakończony
-
University of AlbertaZakończonySkolioza; Idiopatyczny, infantylny