Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Ventilação não invasiva versus assistência ventilatória ajustada neuralmente (NAVA) para o tratamento da bronquiolite

10 de novembro de 2026 atualizado por: Montefiore Medical Center

Comparação entre ventilação não invasiva convencional e ventilação não invasiva com assistência ventilatória neuralmente ajustada (NAVA) para o tratamento de bronquiolite

This project aims to answer whether the use of a Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance mode for non-invasive ventilation in pediatric patients with bronchiolitis results in improved comfort and reduced escalations in therapy (including intubation) when compared to using a standard mode of non-invasive ventilation. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) has been shown to result in greater synchrony then the standard mode of non-invasive ventilation. The study team hypothesizes that this improved synchrony can result in important clinical improvements when NAVA is used to treat children with bronchiolitis.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Bronchiolitis is a common diagnosis in pediatric hospitals and critical care units. Viral infection in younger patients often results in increased work of breathing, hypoxemia, impaired ventilation, and increased secretion burden. In some cases, treatment of severe respiratory failure includes intubation and mechanical ventilation. Current practice for patients with bronchiolitis who require hospital admission is to initially provide non-invasive ventilation to improve the patient's respiratory mechanics. This non-invasive respiratory support can range from simple nasal cannula, to high-flow nasal cannula, to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) provides warm, humidified, oxygen-enriched air. Therapy commonly is prescribed with a prescribed fraction of inhaled oxygen (FiO2) delivered at 1-2 L/kg/min. This helps to improve oxygenation as the high rate of flow can "wash-out" carbon dioxide in the upper airways and thus reduce the volume of dead space ventilation.

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) essentially provides a similar method of support as invasive ventilation without the use of endotracheal tube. Prescribed airway support is instead delivered non-invasively through a specialized nasal cannula or for larger children an occlusive facemask of appropriate size. The ventilator provides positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a prescribed delivery rate of a set inspiratory pressure (positive inspiratory pressure, or pressure control). This ventilator support enables the delivery of a set FiO2, helps maintain open airways to reduce atelectasis and allow for improved oxygenation with better V/Q matching, and improves work of breathing. The ventilator analyzes the flow generated by the patient's inspiratory effort and attempts to provide the prescribed positive inspiratory pressure at the time of the patient's own effort.

One of the major drawbacks of non-invasive ventilation for young pediatric patients with bronchiolitis is the difficulty in achieving synchrony between patient effort and ventilator-delivered positive inspiratory pressure. This is secondary to the large air leak given the non-invasive apparatus and the low inspiratory flows generated by this patient population. Thus, the ventilator and patient are often dyssynchronous which may actually increase work of breathing and agitation while impeding on the ventilatory support provided.

Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) attempts to mitigate the harms of ventilator/patient dyssynchrony. This modality utilizes a specialized catheter placed into the esophagus, often via a nasogastric route, which has the capability of monitoring the electrical activity of the patient's diaphragm. This catheter can also be utilized to deliver feeds similarly to a basic nasogastric tube. The NAVA catheter monitors both the activation of the patient's diaphragm (indicating patient respiratory effort) and the strength of this activation in, referred to as the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) and measured in millivolts (µV). Both human and animal studies have positively correlated the peak Edi values with work-of-breathing and demonstrated higher Edi values when respiratory pathology is present . Based on the Edi tracing, the ventilator can then deliver positive inspiratory pressure that is synchronous with both the patient's respiratory effort and proportional to the strength of this effort through a multiplier referred to as the NAVA level on the ventilator. This modality has been shown to improve patient agitation levels, reduce the need for sedating medications, and enhance synchrony in non-invasive ventilation modes.

The current practice model of the investigators entails that patients with bronchiolitis who require more than 1.5 L/kg of HFNC or require non-invasive ventilation, whether via a conventional or NAVA modality, are managed in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Both modalities for non-invasive ventilation (conventional and NAVA) are used routinely. Patient respiratory status is aggregated into a value known as the Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) which accounts for respiratory rate, dyspnea, retractions, and auscultatory findings adjusted for the age of the patient. The RSS value is a validated assessment tool with good interobserver reliability between Medical Doctors (MDs), Registered Nurses (RNs), and Respiratory Therapists (RTs). It is calculated on a 4-hour basis for all patients with bronchiolitis in the investigator's PICU and helps determine clinical improvement or deterioration and better guide decisions to increase or decrease support.

While multiple physiologic studies demonstrate a reduced work of breathing with invasive NAVA ventilation, the majority of pediatric studies focused on non-invasive NAVA ventilation were designed to determine improvements in patient/ventilator synchronization. The investigators' project aims are two-fold. The study team hypothesizes that Edi levels and RSS scores will positively correlate for patients with bronchiolitis, allowing for another metric to gauge clinical status. The investigators also hypothesizes that the improved synchronization on NAVA-NIV may improve respiratory status as measured by RSS scores and Edi levels, reduce further escalations in respiratory support, shorten the length of non-invasive ventilation required, and reduce intubation rates. This improvement will be more substantial when transitioning from HFNC to NAVA-NIV compared to transitioning to conventional-NIV.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

20

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • New York
      • The Bronx, New York, Estados Unidos, 10467
        • Children's Hospital at Montefiore

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

1 segundo a 2 anos (Filho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under the age of two years old with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis presenting to the pediatric ICU
  • Patient's provider believes there is equipoise between the use of NAVA or conventional non-invasive ventilation for the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to utilize a nasogastric tube
  • Patients with a diagnosis of chronic lung disease, cyanotic heart lesions, or congestive heart failure
  • Patients with hypotonia
  • Patients likely to require imminent intubation: >0.60 Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2); Carbon Dioxide (CO2) > 60, frequent apneas, clinician determines patient unlikely to tolerate non-invasive modality)
  • Patients with hemodynamic instability, defined as the need for vasoactive medication

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Standard Non-Invasive Mechanical Servo Ventilation Arm

This arm will utilize a standard mode of non-invasive ventilation within protocol parameters.

The active comparator arm will utilize a standard non-invasive mode to provide ventilation support

Experimental: Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) Non-Invasive Mechanical Servo Ventilation Arm

This arm with utilize a NAVA mode of non-invasive ventilation within protocol parameters.

The experimental arm will utilize a NAVA mode to provide non-invasive ventilation support

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Baseline Respiratory Severity Score (RSS)
Prazo: Approximately one hour after Edi catheter placement

RSS is a validated measure of severity in children with bronchiolitis, scored from 0-12 with higher numbers indicating greater severity. If able, baseline scores will be taken before randomization to either treatment arm.

Approximately one hour after Edi catheter placement
Average Respiratory Severity Score (RSS)
Prazo: 48 hour average, values collected at ~4 hour intervals.

RSS is a validated measure of severity in children with bronchiolitis, scored from 0-12 with higher numbers indicating greater severity. Average RSS values over a 48-hour period will be reported for each treatment arm.

48 hour average, values collected at ~4 hour intervals.
Baseline Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (Edi)
Prazo: Approximately one hour after Edi catheter placement

Measure, in microvolts, recorded by the Edi catheter to reflect activity of diaphragmatic activation. Higher values correspond with increased diaphragmatic activation. If able, will be collected prior to randomization to either treatment arm.

Approximately one hour after Edi catheter placement
Average Baseline Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (Edi)
Prazo: 48 hour average, values collected at ~4 hour intervals.

Measure, in microvolts, recorded by the Edi catheter to reflect activity of diaphragmatic activation. Higher values correspond with increased diaphragmatic activation. Average Edi values over a 48-hour period will be reported for each treatment arm.

48 hour average, values collected at ~4 hour intervals.

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Duration of Non-Invasive Ventilation
Prazo: Time of randomization or start of non-invasive ventilation (whichever occurs last) up to 4 weeks later or time of intubation (whichever occurs first)

The duration, in hours, that a patient requires non-invasive ventilation.

Time of randomization or start of non-invasive ventilation (whichever occurs last) up to 4 weeks later or time of intubation (whichever occurs first)
Number of participants requiring intubation
Prazo: Following start of non-invasive ventilation or randomization (whichever comes last) up to 4 weeks later

If a patient requires intubation due to bronchiolitis, this information will be recorded

Following start of non-invasive ventilation or randomization (whichever comes last) up to 4 weeks later
Frequency of increasing ventilatory support
Prazo: From hours 4-48 of the intervention period

The number of times that a physician increases respiratory support settings on the ventilator (other than FiO2) while remaining within protocol parameters will be documented. The number of events, limited to one event per hour, of increase in respiratory support will be counted during the study period. A greater number of increases in ventilatory support will indicate inadequate response to the treatment arm intervention.

From hours 4-48 of the intervention period
Number of patients requiring dexmedetomidine
Prazo: Through 48 hour study intervention period

The number of patients requiring dexmedetomidine will be tabulated. The use of dexmedetomidine use likely reflects patient agitation and inability to ventilate adequately on non-invasive ventilation. The use of dexmedetomidine may indicate more agitation present within a given treatment arm.

Through 48 hour study intervention period

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Jacqueline Weingarten, MD, Montefiore Medical Center

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

18 de dezembro de 2023

Conclusão Primária (Real)

25 de maio de 2025

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

25 de maio de 2025

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

6 de setembro de 2023

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

18 de setembro de 2023

Primeira postagem (Real)

26 de setembro de 2023

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

13 de novembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

10 de novembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de novembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Sim

produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA

Sim

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever