Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Ventilazione non invasiva e assistenza ventilatoria con regolazione neurale (NAVA) per il trattamento della bronchiolite

10 novembre 2026 aggiornato da: Montefiore Medical Center

Confronto tra ventilazione convenzionale non invasiva e ventilazione assistita con regolazione neurale (NAVA) non invasiva per il trattamento della bronchiolite

This project aims to answer whether the use of a Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance mode for non-invasive ventilation in pediatric patients with bronchiolitis results in improved comfort and reduced escalations in therapy (including intubation) when compared to using a standard mode of non-invasive ventilation. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) has been shown to result in greater synchrony then the standard mode of non-invasive ventilation. The study team hypothesizes that this improved synchrony can result in important clinical improvements when NAVA is used to treat children with bronchiolitis.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Bronchiolitis is a common diagnosis in pediatric hospitals and critical care units. Viral infection in younger patients often results in increased work of breathing, hypoxemia, impaired ventilation, and increased secretion burden. In some cases, treatment of severe respiratory failure includes intubation and mechanical ventilation. Current practice for patients with bronchiolitis who require hospital admission is to initially provide non-invasive ventilation to improve the patient's respiratory mechanics. This non-invasive respiratory support can range from simple nasal cannula, to high-flow nasal cannula, to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) provides warm, humidified, oxygen-enriched air. Therapy commonly is prescribed with a prescribed fraction of inhaled oxygen (FiO2) delivered at 1-2 L/kg/min. This helps to improve oxygenation as the high rate of flow can "wash-out" carbon dioxide in the upper airways and thus reduce the volume of dead space ventilation.

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) essentially provides a similar method of support as invasive ventilation without the use of endotracheal tube. Prescribed airway support is instead delivered non-invasively through a specialized nasal cannula or for larger children an occlusive facemask of appropriate size. The ventilator provides positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a prescribed delivery rate of a set inspiratory pressure (positive inspiratory pressure, or pressure control). This ventilator support enables the delivery of a set FiO2, helps maintain open airways to reduce atelectasis and allow for improved oxygenation with better V/Q matching, and improves work of breathing. The ventilator analyzes the flow generated by the patient's inspiratory effort and attempts to provide the prescribed positive inspiratory pressure at the time of the patient's own effort.

One of the major drawbacks of non-invasive ventilation for young pediatric patients with bronchiolitis is the difficulty in achieving synchrony between patient effort and ventilator-delivered positive inspiratory pressure. This is secondary to the large air leak given the non-invasive apparatus and the low inspiratory flows generated by this patient population. Thus, the ventilator and patient are often dyssynchronous which may actually increase work of breathing and agitation while impeding on the ventilatory support provided.

Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) attempts to mitigate the harms of ventilator/patient dyssynchrony. This modality utilizes a specialized catheter placed into the esophagus, often via a nasogastric route, which has the capability of monitoring the electrical activity of the patient's diaphragm. This catheter can also be utilized to deliver feeds similarly to a basic nasogastric tube. The NAVA catheter monitors both the activation of the patient's diaphragm (indicating patient respiratory effort) and the strength of this activation in, referred to as the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) and measured in millivolts (µV). Both human and animal studies have positively correlated the peak Edi values with work-of-breathing and demonstrated higher Edi values when respiratory pathology is present . Based on the Edi tracing, the ventilator can then deliver positive inspiratory pressure that is synchronous with both the patient's respiratory effort and proportional to the strength of this effort through a multiplier referred to as the NAVA level on the ventilator. This modality has been shown to improve patient agitation levels, reduce the need for sedating medications, and enhance synchrony in non-invasive ventilation modes.

The current practice model of the investigators entails that patients with bronchiolitis who require more than 1.5 L/kg of HFNC or require non-invasive ventilation, whether via a conventional or NAVA modality, are managed in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Both modalities for non-invasive ventilation (conventional and NAVA) are used routinely. Patient respiratory status is aggregated into a value known as the Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) which accounts for respiratory rate, dyspnea, retractions, and auscultatory findings adjusted for the age of the patient. The RSS value is a validated assessment tool with good interobserver reliability between Medical Doctors (MDs), Registered Nurses (RNs), and Respiratory Therapists (RTs). It is calculated on a 4-hour basis for all patients with bronchiolitis in the investigator's PICU and helps determine clinical improvement or deterioration and better guide decisions to increase or decrease support.

While multiple physiologic studies demonstrate a reduced work of breathing with invasive NAVA ventilation, the majority of pediatric studies focused on non-invasive NAVA ventilation were designed to determine improvements in patient/ventilator synchronization. The investigators' project aims are two-fold. The study team hypothesizes that Edi levels and RSS scores will positively correlate for patients with bronchiolitis, allowing for another metric to gauge clinical status. The investigators also hypothesizes that the improved synchronization on NAVA-NIV may improve respiratory status as measured by RSS scores and Edi levels, reduce further escalations in respiratory support, shorten the length of non-invasive ventilation required, and reduce intubation rates. This improvement will be more substantial when transitioning from HFNC to NAVA-NIV compared to transitioning to conventional-NIV.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

20

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • New York
      • The Bronx, New York, Stati Uniti, 10467
        • Children's Hospital at Montefiore

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 1 secondo a 2 anni (Bambino)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under the age of two years old with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis presenting to the pediatric ICU
  • Patient's provider believes there is equipoise between the use of NAVA or conventional non-invasive ventilation for the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to utilize a nasogastric tube
  • Patients with a diagnosis of chronic lung disease, cyanotic heart lesions, or congestive heart failure
  • Patients with hypotonia
  • Patients likely to require imminent intubation: >0.60 Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2); Carbon Dioxide (CO2) > 60, frequent apneas, clinician determines patient unlikely to tolerate non-invasive modality)
  • Patients with hemodynamic instability, defined as the need for vasoactive medication

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore attivo: Standard Non-Invasive Mechanical Servo Ventilation Arm

This arm will utilize a standard mode of non-invasive ventilation within protocol parameters.

The active comparator arm will utilize a standard non-invasive mode to provide ventilation support

Sperimentale: Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) Non-Invasive Mechanical Servo Ventilation Arm

This arm with utilize a NAVA mode of non-invasive ventilation within protocol parameters.

The experimental arm will utilize a NAVA mode to provide non-invasive ventilation support

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Baseline Respiratory Severity Score (RSS)
Lasso di tempo: Approximately one hour after Edi catheter placement

RSS is a validated measure of severity in children with bronchiolitis, scored from 0-12 with higher numbers indicating greater severity. If able, baseline scores will be taken before randomization to either treatment arm.

Approximately one hour after Edi catheter placement
Average Respiratory Severity Score (RSS)
Lasso di tempo: 48 hour average, values collected at ~4 hour intervals.

RSS is a validated measure of severity in children with bronchiolitis, scored from 0-12 with higher numbers indicating greater severity. Average RSS values over a 48-hour period will be reported for each treatment arm.

48 hour average, values collected at ~4 hour intervals.
Baseline Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (Edi)
Lasso di tempo: Approximately one hour after Edi catheter placement

Measure, in microvolts, recorded by the Edi catheter to reflect activity of diaphragmatic activation. Higher values correspond with increased diaphragmatic activation. If able, will be collected prior to randomization to either treatment arm.

Approximately one hour after Edi catheter placement
Average Baseline Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (Edi)
Lasso di tempo: 48 hour average, values collected at ~4 hour intervals.

Measure, in microvolts, recorded by the Edi catheter to reflect activity of diaphragmatic activation. Higher values correspond with increased diaphragmatic activation. Average Edi values over a 48-hour period will be reported for each treatment arm.

48 hour average, values collected at ~4 hour intervals.

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Duration of Non-Invasive Ventilation
Lasso di tempo: Time of randomization or start of non-invasive ventilation (whichever occurs last) up to 4 weeks later or time of intubation (whichever occurs first)

The duration, in hours, that a patient requires non-invasive ventilation.

Time of randomization or start of non-invasive ventilation (whichever occurs last) up to 4 weeks later or time of intubation (whichever occurs first)
Number of participants requiring intubation
Lasso di tempo: Following start of non-invasive ventilation or randomization (whichever comes last) up to 4 weeks later

If a patient requires intubation due to bronchiolitis, this information will be recorded

Following start of non-invasive ventilation or randomization (whichever comes last) up to 4 weeks later
Frequency of increasing ventilatory support
Lasso di tempo: From hours 4-48 of the intervention period

The number of times that a physician increases respiratory support settings on the ventilator (other than FiO2) while remaining within protocol parameters will be documented. The number of events, limited to one event per hour, of increase in respiratory support will be counted during the study period. A greater number of increases in ventilatory support will indicate inadequate response to the treatment arm intervention.

From hours 4-48 of the intervention period
Number of patients requiring dexmedetomidine
Lasso di tempo: Through 48 hour study intervention period

The number of patients requiring dexmedetomidine will be tabulated. The use of dexmedetomidine use likely reflects patient agitation and inability to ventilate adequately on non-invasive ventilation. The use of dexmedetomidine may indicate more agitation present within a given treatment arm.

Through 48 hour study intervention period

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Jacqueline Weingarten, MD, Montefiore Medical Center

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

18 dicembre 2023

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

25 maggio 2025

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

25 maggio 2025

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

6 settembre 2023

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

18 settembre 2023

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

26 settembre 2023

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

13 novembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

10 novembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 novembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

Sì

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

Sì

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi