- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07251400
Eficácia Analgésica do Bloqueio do Músculo Erector da Espinha e da Bainha do Reto em Doentes Submetidos a Reparação Laparoscópica de Hérnia Inguinal (analgesia)
A Eficácia Analgésica do Bloqueio do Músculo Erector da Espinha e da Bainha do Reto Guiado por Ultrassom em Doentes Submetidos a Reparação Laparoscópica de Hérnia Inguinal: um Ensaio Controlado Randomizado
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and rectus sheet block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic bilateral hernia repair.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Multiple factors play a critical role in the development of pain after laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair surgery. These include parietal stimulation from the surgical incision, visceral stimulation from the peritoneum, and manipulation of intra-abdominal structures. Somatic innervation of the anterior abdominal wall is provided by the thoracolumbar spinal nerves T6-L1. Innervation of the skin above the umbilicus is provided by cutaneous nerves T6 to T9. The area around the umbilicus is innervated by T10, while the underlying skin is innervated by T11, T12, and L1. The peritoneum contains "silent nociceptors" that are activated by surgical injury and intraperitoneal inflammation and contribute to visceral pain. The neuro-immuno-humoral pain pathways involved in abdominal surgery involve somatic and autonomic nerves. Parasympathetic activation and decreased vagal tone have been shown to influence perioperative outcome because they exacerbate inflammation associated with gastrointestinal dysfunction. Thoracic epidural analgesia is still considered the gold standard for postoperative analgesia in major abdominal surgery; however, concerns about the risk of major complications such as hypotension, motor block, epidural hematoma, and abscess sometimes limit its use. Intravenous morphine administration is a cornerstone of pain management, but the side effects seen after opioid use limit its use. An ideal multimodal analgesic method includes regional blocks (neuraxial blocks [epidural and paravertebral analgesia], plane blocks [transversus abdominis plane blocks and rectus sheath block], intravenous analgesic medications (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors, or single intraoperative dexamethasone), and surgical field infiltration.
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was first described for the treatment of thoracic neuropathic pain and has since become an effective periparavertebral regional anesthesia technique applied to prevent postoperative pain in various surgeries. ESPB was initially applied at the T5 level, but more recently has been shown to be effective in providing comprehensive somatic and visceral abdominal analgesia when applied at the T7-T9 level. It is easier to administer than thoracic epidural anesthesia and thoracic paravertebral block. The effectiveness of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been studied. A study evaluating ESPB with bilateral ultrasound concluded that it provides effective analgesia in patients and significantly reduces analgesia requirements, extending to up to 1 week. Bilateral rectus sheath block (RSB) provides analgesia to the anteromedial abdominal wall and periumbilical area by blocking spinal dermatomes T9, T10, and T11. RSB provides analgesia to the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves and is therefore well-suited for postoperative analgesia for midline abdominal incisions. Although initially developed to provide anterior abdominal muscle relaxation, RSB has subsequently been used for pain relief after abdominal surgery. This fascial plane block involves the deposition of a local anesthetic between the rectus muscle and the posterior sheath to anesthetize the terminal branches of the lower thoracic spinal nerves T7-T12. A recent meta-analysis of 698 patients found that RSB improved pain control and reduced opioid consumption for up to 12 hours postoperatively, with no significant adverse events reported.
The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and rectus sheet block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic bilateral hernia repair. The secondary objective was to compare opioid consumption in the postoperative period.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
Umraniye
-
Istanbul, Umraniye, Turquia (Türkiye), 34034
- Umraniye Education and Research Hospital
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18 and under 70 years of age
- ASA I-III
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with ASA IV,
- known neurological or psychiatric disorders,
- asthma or COPD,
- long-term drug or alcohol abuse,
- diabetes mellitus,
- BMI >35,
- intellectual disability,
- contraindications for EPSP or RSB,
- massive bleeding, coagulopathy
- those with significant systemic conditions undergoing emergency surgery
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Dobro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador Ativo: ESB (Erector spinae plane block) group
The ESP block will be applied under general anesthesia after skin closure lateral decubitus position. The ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation approximately 3 cm lateral to the T7 spinous process. Using the inplane technique, a 22-gauge, 80 mm needle will be advanced craniocaudally, and 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. ESPB will be performed bilaterally, with 30 ml of local anesthetic administered to the plane of the erector spinae on each side. |
postoperative analgesia for inguinal hernia repair
Outros nomes:
|
|
Comparador Ativo: RSB (Bilateral rectus sheath block) group
Before recovery from anesthesia, an ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block will be performed after the skin incision is closed. the rectus sheath and the posterior aspect of the rectus abdominis muscle an 80 mm, 22-gauge short-tapered needle will be advanced anterolaterally to medially using in-plane placement with real-time assessment, Once the tip is correctly positioned in the intended plane, 20 mL of a local anesthetic, typically bupivacaine at a concentration of 0.25%, will be administered on each side for effective analgesia. |
postoperative analgesia for inguinal hernia repair
Outros nomes:
|
|
Comparador Ativo: LA infiltration group
Patients who will receive local anesthesia only for surgical incisions will be considered the control group. 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be applied to the surgical incisions, and no plane block will be performed |
postoperative analgesia for inguinal hernia repair
Outros nomes:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic bilateral hernia repair
Prazo: 24 hours after extubation
|
VAS score |
24 hours after extubation
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Prazo: immediately after the surgery
|
remifentanyl |
immediately after the surgery
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Zeliha Alıcıkuş, asc prof, Umraniye ERH
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- Zeliha20
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .