Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Fördelar med individuell fysisk aktivitetsintervention på hälsorelaterad livskvalitet hos deltagare med kronisk lymfatisk leukemi (QOLIBRI)

2 november 2026 uppdaterad av: Janssen Cilag S.A.S.

Fördelarna med en individuell fysisk aktivitetsintervention på hälsorelaterad livskvalitet hos patienter med kronisk lymfatisk leukemi som får Ibrutinib i verkligheten

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of an individual physical activity intervention (IPAI) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with first line or relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) initiating ibrutinib in a routine clinical practice setting. HRQoL will be measured using functional assessment of cancer therapy - general scale (FACT-G).

Studieöversikt

Status

Rekrytering

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Studietyp

Observationell

Inskrivning (Beräknad)

180

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studiekontakt

Studieorter

      • Toulouse, Frankrike, 31059
        • Rekrytering
        • Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

18 år och äldre (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Testmetod

Sannolikhetsprov

Studera befolkning

The study population will include participants aged at least 18 years of age with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants newly treated with ibrutinib for first line or relapsed CLL (treatment is being initiated or has been initiated within the last 8 days as a maximum)
  • Participants agreed to follow the individual physical activity intervention (IPAI)
  • Participants using or having access to a compatible and appropriate electronic device such as smartphone, laptop or tablet
  • Participants with Internet access at home and email address
  • Participants agreed to wear a connected watch 24 hours a day for all the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant participants or planning to become pregnant while enrolled in this study
  • Participants with inability or deemed unsafe to practice physical activity
  • Participants who have received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 90 days before the inclusion visit
  • Participants who are currently involved in an interventional study
  • Participants with probable difficulties in using the digital tool autonomously

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Observationsmodeller: COHORT
  • Tidsperspektiv: PROSPECTIVE

Kohorter och interventioner

Grupp / Kohort
Intervention / Behandling
Group 1: Individual Physical Activity Intervention

Participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) will be invited to perform physical activity according to a predefined intervention program. This program includes walking and weekly remote adapted physical activity sessions (2 sessions per week, the duration and difficulty of which will be adapted by the adapted physical activity [APA] trainer according to the Participant's abilities).

No drug will be administered as a part of this study. The intervention will consist in an IPAI provided to participants for 6 months to practice physical activity in addition to their medical treatment in routine clinical practice settings. IPAI will be an adaptive program and will comprise two periods, the first period consisting in a supervised 4-month program and the second one in an unsupervised 2-month program to achieve greater autonomy.

No drug will be administered as a part of this study. Participants received ibrutinib as per their routine clinical practice settings.

Group 2: Standard of Care

Participants with CLL will continue physical activity according to their lifestyle and the recommendations of the medical team.

No drug will be administered as a part of this study. Participants received ibrutinib as per their routine clinical practice settings.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) by Using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G) Total Score at Month 4.5
Tidsram: Baseline and Month 4.5

The FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 dimensions: physical well-being (PWB; 7 items), social/family well-being (SWB; 7 items), emotional well-being (EWB; 6 items), and functional well-being (FWB; 7 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total FACT-G score is the summation of 4 subscale scores and ranges from 0-108. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Baseline and Month 4.5

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Change from Baseline in HRQoL by Using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Total Score at Month 4.5, Month 6.5 and Month 12
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

The FACT-Leu questionnaire consists of 44 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), SWB (7 items), EWB (6 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total FACT-Leu score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change from Month 4.5 in HRQoL by Using FACT-Leu Total Score at Month 6.5
Tidsram: Month 4.5 and Month 6.5

The FACT-Leu questionnaire consists of 44 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), SWB (7 items), EWB (6 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total FACT-Leu score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Month 4.5 and Month 6.5
Change from Month 6.5 in HRQoL by Using FACT-Leu Total Score at Month 12
Tidsram: Month 6.5 and Month 12

The FACT-Leu questionnaire consists of 44 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), SWB (7 items), EWB (6 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total FACT-Leu score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Month 6.5 and Month 12
Change from Baseline in HRQoL by Using Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Total Score at Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

The TOI questionnaire consists of 31 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total TOI score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change from Month 4.5 in HRQoL by Using Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Total Score at Month 6.5
Tidsram: Month 4.5 and Month 6.5

The TOI questionnaire consists of 31 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total TOI score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Month 4.5 and Month 6.5
Change from Month 6.5 in HRQoL by Using Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Total Score at Month 12
Tidsram: Month 6.5 and Month 12

The TOI questionnaire consists of 31 questions grouped into 5 dimensions: PWB (7 items), FWB (7 items) and additional concerns (LEUS; 17 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total TOI score is the summation of 5 subscale scores and ranges from 0-176. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Month 6.5 and Month 12
Change from Baseline in HRQoL by Using FACT-G Scale at Month 6.5 and Month 12
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 6.5, and Month 12

The FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 dimensions: physical well-being (PWB; 7 items), social/family well-being (SWB; 7 items), emotional well-being (EWB; 6 items), and functional well-being (FWB; 7 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total FACT-G score is the summation of 4 subscale scores and ranges from 0-108. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Baseline, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change from Month 4.5 in HRQoL by Using FACT-G Scale at Month 6.5
Tidsram: Month 4.5 and Month 6.5

The FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 dimensions: physical well-being (PWB; 7 items), social/family well-being (SWB; 7 items), emotional well-being (EWB; 6 items), and functional well-being (FWB; 7 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total FACT-G score is the summation of 4 subscale scores and ranges from 0-108. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Month 4.5 and Month 6.5
Change from Month 6.5 in HRQoL by Using FACT-G Scale at Month 12
Tidsram: Month 6.5 and Month 12

The FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 dimensions: physical well-being (PWB; 7 items), social/family well-being (SWB; 7 items), emotional well-being (EWB; 6 items), and functional well-being (FWB; 7 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total FACT-G score is the summation of 4 subscale scores and ranges from 0-108. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Month 6.5 and Month 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 5-Point Improvement in the FACT-G Total Score at Months 4.5, 6.5, and 12 as Compared to Baseline
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

The FACT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 dimensions: physical well-being (PWB; 7 items), social/family well-being (SWB; 7 items), emotional well-being (EWB; 6 items), and functional well-being (FWB; 7 items). Each item is given a weighted score of 0 to 4 and the score of each dimension are obtained by addition of the weighted scores of each item corresponding to the dimension. Total FACT-G score is the summation of 4 subscale scores and ranges from 0-108. Higher scores for the scales and subscales indicate better HRQoL.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change from Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total Score at Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

The FACIT-fatigue is a questionnaire that assesses self-reported tiredness, weakness, and difficulty conducting usual activities due to fatigue. The subscale consists of 13-item instrument to measure fatigue. Each of the 13 items has a set of five response categories: Not at all (=0), A little bit (=1), Somewhat (=2), Quite a bit (=3) and Very much (=4). A total FACIT-Fatigue subscale score is calculated as the sum of the 13 item scores (reserved scores [4 - score]) and ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement of fatigue. Items are reverse scored when appropriate to provide a scale in which higher scores represent better functioning or less fatigue.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Total Sleep Time Using Connected Watch
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

Change from baseline in total sleep time (in hours) using connected watch will be assessed.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Total Sleep Score Using Connected Watch
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

Change from baseline in total sleep score (time asleep/time in bed) based on duration, regularity, depth and interruption using connected watch will be assessed.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Sleep Stages Using Connected Watch
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

Change from baseline in sleep stages (deep/light) using connected watch will be assessed.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Score at Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

The HAD scale is a 14-items measure that assesses anxiety and depressive disorders. The scale includes seven questions related to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D). Each item is rated from 0 to 3. Two scores are derived from the scale, one related to anxiety and the other related to depression (maximum score for each score = 21). Higher scores indicate increased anxiety or depression.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Physical Fitness as Measured by Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

The 6MWT is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. It is easy to administer, better tolerated, and more reflective of activities of daily living than the other walk tests.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity as Assessed by Number of Steps per Day Using Connected Watch
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

Change from baseline in physical activity as assessed by number of steps per day using connected watch will be reported.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity as Assessed by the Number of Walking Sessions per Week using Connected Watch
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

Change from baseline in physical activity as assessed by the number of walking sessions per week using connected watch will be reported.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity as Assessed by the Time of Walking Sessions per Week Using Connected Watch
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

Change from baseline in physical activity as assessed by the time of walking sessions per week using connected watch will be reported.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity as Assessed by the Distance of Walking Sessions per Week Using Connected Watch
Tidsram: Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12

Change from baseline in physical activity as assessed by the distance of walking sessions per week using connected watch will be reported.

Baseline, Month 4.5, Month 6.5, and Month 12
Percentage of Participants with Treatment-related Adverse Events
Tidsram: Up to 30 months

Percentage of participants with treatment-related adverse events especially musculoskeletal and cardiovascular treatment-related adverse events will be reported.

Up to 30 months
Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD)
Tidsram: Months 6 and 12

TTD is defined as the time between the first day of ibrutinib treatment and the day that ibrutinib is definitely stopped for whatever reason or death.

Months 6 and 12
Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation
Tidsram: Up to Month 12

Number of participants in each reason for treatment discontinuation will be reported. Reasons for treatment discontinuation are defined as: adverse events, lack of efficacy, patient's convenience, physician's decision, progression, death or other.

Up to Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Still Wear the Connected Watch
Tidsram: Months 1, 3, 4.5, 6.5, and 12

Percentage of participants who still wear the connected watch (adherence) will be assessed.

Months 1, 3, 4.5, 6.5, and 12
Percentage of Participants Retained by the Connected Watch (Start Wearing the Watch)
Tidsram: Months 1, 3, 4.5, 6.5, and 12

Percentage of participants retained by the connected watch (start wearing the watch) will be assessed.

Months 1, 3, 4.5, 6.5, and 12
Percentage of Participants Agreed to Participate in the Study Among Eligible participants with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Initiation Ibrutinib Treatment
Tidsram: During the first 6 months (Feasibility period)

Percentage of participants agreed to participate in the study among eligible participants with CLL initiation ibrutinib treatment will be reported.

During the first 6 months (Feasibility period)
For Group 1: Percentage of Participants Who Still Follow the Individual Physical Activity Intervention (IPAI) Among Those Who Have Started IPAI
Tidsram: Months 1, 3, 4.5, and 6.5

Percentage of participants who still follow the IPAI among those who have started IPAI (Adherence) in group 1 will be assessed.

Months 1, 3, 4.5, and 6.5
For Group 1: Percentage of Participants Who Follow the Adapted Physical Activity (APA) Sessions, the Walking Objectives and the APA Appointment as Scheduled With the APA Among Those Who Have Started IPAI
Tidsram: Months 1, 3, 4.5, and 4.6

Percentage of participants who follow the adapted physical activity sessions, the walking objectives and the APA appointment as scheduled with the APA among those who have started IPAI (Compliance) in group 1 will be assessed.

Months 1, 3, 4.5, and 4.6
For Group 1: Percentage of Participants Retained by the IPAI (First APA Videoconference Attended) Among Participants Enrolled in the Study
Tidsram: Months 1 and 3

Percentage of participants retained by the IPAI (first APA videoconference attended) among participants enrolled in the study will be assessed.

Months 1 and 3
For Group 1: Percentage of Participants who Completed the Supervised Period Among Participants Enrolled in the Study
Tidsram: Month 4.5

Percentage of participants who completed the supervised period among participants enrolled in the study will be assessed.

Month 4.5
For Group 1: Percentage of Participants who Completed the Unsupervised Period Among Participants Enrolled in the Study
Tidsram: Month 6.5

Percentage of participants who completed the unsupervised period among participants enrolled in the study will be assessed.

Month 6.5
For Group 1: Participant Satisfaction With the IPAI Measured With the Satisfaction Likert Scale
Tidsram: Months 4.5, 6.5, and 12

Participant's' satisfaction will be assessed by Likert scales at Months 4.5 and 6.5 regarding coaching, proposed sessions, program content, program duration, impact on APA practice, overall satisfaction, willingness to continue and recommendation to others. Likert scales will assess participant's' satisfaction at Month 12 regarding impact on APA practice, overall satisfaction, willingness to continue and recommendation to others. Only one question is quantitative with score range from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (totally satisfied) for global satisfaction. Participants are considered satisfied when score is greater than or equal to (>=) 6 and highly-satisfied when score is >=8. All other questions are qualitative and have 5-level Likert scales including: very satisfied, rather satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, not really satisfied, not at all satisfied.

Months 4.5, 6.5, and 12

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Sponsor

Utredare

  • Studierektor: Janssen Cilag S.A.S., France Clinical Trial, Janssen Cilag S.A.S.

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

27 maj 2024

Primärt slutförande (Beräknad)

30 oktober 2026

Avslutad studie (Beräknad)

30 november 2027

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

1 mars 2024

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

1 mars 2024

Första postat (Faktisk)

8 mars 2024

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

3 november 2026

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

2 november 2026

Senast verifierad

1 november 2026

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • 54179060CLL4033
  • 54179060CLL4033 (Annan identifierare: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivning

The data sharing policy of Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .