此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

rTMS Study to Improve Functional Performance for Patients With Stroke

2015年12月10日 更新者:Yen-Nung Lin、Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital

The Potential Benefit of 1-Hz rTMS to Improve Gross Motor Function After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

To use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat stroke patients is getting a popular idea. Previous studies seemed to support its effects on facilitating motor recovery after stroke. This study focuses on the motor recovery of lower extremities. Investigators conducted the study to evaluate the treatment effect of rTMS on the functional performance of lower extremities in terms of postural control, balance, and mobility in stroke patients. Investigators hypothesized that these performances could be improved through the better motor control of lower extremities caused by rTMS.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Protocol:

  1. Setting: inpatient rehabilitation department of Shuang-Ho Hospital.
  2. Study population: Patients received inpatient treatment or rehabilitation for stroke in Shuang-Ho Hospital (SHH).
  3. Eligibility. Screening for eligibility was done by the 2 physiatrists from rehabilitation department of SHH.
  4. Study design: controlled trial with stratified randomization
  5. Blinding

    1. The patients were blinded by the real or sham coil of rTMS
    2. The assessors who performed the outcome measurements were blinded to the assignment of treatment.
  6. Measurements.

    1. Baseline demographic records. The stroke severity was measured by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Modified Rankin Scale (MRS), Brunnstrum stage, and Manual muscle test (MMT) before intervention.
    2. Clinical assessments.

      • Postural control was assessed by Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)
      • The motor recovery of lower extremities was assessed by the lower extremity subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE)
      • The balance and gait subscales of Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA-b and POMA-g)
      • Timed Up and Go (TUG) test was used to assess the gross mobility.
      • Barthel Index (BI) for the ADL independence
      • modified Rankin Scale (MRS) for disability classification were also collected.
    3. These measurements (including the clinical and corticomotor excitability assessments) are performed by one researcher who are responsible for the measurements.
  7. Compliance and side effect. The compliance of interventions were investigated. The attendance of treatments (including rTMS sessions and physical therapy sessions) and possible side effect/discomfort were recorded during the interventions by a researcher. He also tries to understand the reason of drop-out from the study.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

60

阶段

  • 第三阶段

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • New Taipei City、台湾
        • Shuang Ho Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 至 80年 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • unilateral hemiplegia caused by the stroke,
  • first ever stroke,
  • time since stroke: 10-90 days,
  • age: 18-80 y/o,
  • Functional ambulation classification (FAC): 0-2,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindication to TMS (eg, pacemaker, seizure history, pregnancy),
  • cranial metal implants
  • intracranial hemorrhage associated with tumor or arteriovenous malformation, craniotomy
  • able to complete Timed Up and Go (TUG) test within 2 minutes
  • unable to walk normally before the stroke
  • those whose motor evoked potentials (MEP) of M1-UH were absent in the pretest

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:阶乘赋值
  • 屏蔽:三倍

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:real rTMS
Experimental included the a daily real rTMS session for 15 mins followed by a physical therapy for 45 mins.
Interventions started on the next weekday after pretest and were performed once a day for 15 consecutive weekdays. Participants in the E and C groups received rTMS (either real or sham, 1 Hz, 15 minutes), followed by a session of physical therapy for 45 minutes.
其他名称:
  • Magstim Rapid2
假比较器:sham rTMS
the control interventions included a daily sham rTMS session for 15 minutes followed by a physical therapy for 45 minutes.
Interventions started on the next weekday after pretest and were performed once a day for 15 consecutive weekdays. Participants in the E and C groups received rTMS (either real or sham, 1 Hz, 15 minutes), followed by a session of physical therapy for 45 minutes.
其他名称:
  • Magstim Rapid2

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
大体时间
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
大体时间:Up to 3 months after interventions completed
Up to 3 months after interventions completed

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
the lower extremity subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE)
大体时间:up to 3 months after the intervention completed
up to 3 months after the intervention completed
The balance and gait subscales of Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA-b and POMA-g)
大体时间:up to 3 months after the interventions completed
up to 3 months after the interventions completed
Barthel Index (BI)
大体时间:Up to 3 months after interventions completed
Up to 3 months after interventions completed
Postural control was assessed by Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS)
大体时间:up to 3 months after the intervention completed
PASS which examines the patient's ability to maintain or change a given posture and is applicable to patients with very poor postural performance. This instrument has been reported to have a good validity and reliability at different recovery stages after stroke, minimal floor and ceiling effect, and be sensitive to changes in severe stroke patients at early stage after stroke.
up to 3 months after the intervention completed
modified Rankin Scale (MRS)
大体时间:Up to 3 months after interventions completed
Up to 3 months after interventions completed

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Yen-Nung Lin, MD, MS、Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2013年1月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2015年12月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2015年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2013年12月4日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2013年12月4日

首次发布 (估计)

2013年12月10日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2015年12月11日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2015年12月10日

最后验证

2015年12月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

rTMS的临床试验

3
订阅