OPTAMISE: Clinical Effectiveness of Teriparatide After Alendronate or Risedronate Therapy in Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women

January 10, 2011 updated by: Sanofi

Open-Label Study to Determine How Prior Therapy With Alendronate or Risedronate in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Influences the Clinical Effectiveness of Teriparatide

To determine how prior therapy with alendronate or risedronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis influences the clinical effectiveness of teriparatide; The primary objective of the study is to compare the teriparatide (human, recombinant PTH[1-34])-associated change from baseline in a marker of bone formation, N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP), between subjects previously treated with risedronate and those previously treated with alendronate.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

All subjects will be treated with teriparatide (human, recombinant PTH[1-34])(human, recombinant PTH[1-34]), 20 microgram subcutaneously daily for 12 months. Subjects will consist of 290 postmenopausal women previously treated with either risedronate or alendronate for at least 24 months. An approximately equal number of subjects will have been previously treated with risedronate and alendronate, and the subjects will be balanced with regard to duration of previous treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
290

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • New South Wales
      • Cove, New South Wales, Australia
        • sanofi-aventis, Australia
  • Belgium
      • Diegem, Belgium
        • sanofi-aventis, Belgium
  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Laval, Quebec, Canada
        • sanofi-aventis, Canada
  • France
      • Paris, France
        • Sanofi-Aventis, France
  • Netherlands
      • Gouda, Netherlands
        • sanofi-aventis, Netherlands
  • United Kingdom
    • Surrey
      • Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
        • sanofi-aventi, UK
  • United States
    • New Jersey
      • Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States, 08807
        • sanofi-aventis, US

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA include:

  • Post-menopausal women who have used risedronate or alendronate continuously for at least 24 mos prior to enrollment
  • Dosing regimens allowable are continuous (ie, uninterrupted) daily or weekly formulations of risedronate (5 mg once daily [OD] or 35 or 30 mg once a week [OAW]) or alendronate (10 mg OD or 70 mg OAW), for a minimum of 24 months prior to enrollment into study
  • Lumbar spine or total hip BMD T-score 1ess than or equal to -2.0 and >/= 1 prevalent osteoporotic fracture, or lumbar spine or total hip BMD T-score less than or equal to -2.5 with or without and >/= 1 prevalent osteoporotic fracture. The qualifying values must be documented prior to enrollment
  • Vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D) between 16 ng/ml and 80 ng/ml
  • Urine NTX <50 nmol/mmol creatinine (to assure treatment compliance and bone turnover is in the pre-menopausal range)

EXCLUSION CRITERIA include:

  • Impaired renal function, demonstrated by creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min
  • Any condition or disease that may interfere with the evaluation of at least 2 lumbar vertebrae (not necessarily contiguous), determined in a screening radiograph by a radiologist at the central facility (eg, confluent aortic calcifications, severe osteoarthritis, spinal fusion, lumbar spine fractures)
  • Depot injection vitamin D >10,000 IU in the past 9 months prior to starting the investigational product
  • Treatment with antiresorptive agents other than risedronate, alendronate, and hormone replacement therapy within the last 36 months before study entry (ie, ibandronate, pamidronate, etidronate, raloxifene, clodronate, or zoledronate)
  • Use of combination alendronate and risedronate, either simultaneously or sequentially, within 60 months prior to enrollment, or use of any anti-resorptive agent in combination with risedronate or alendronate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compare the PTH-associated change from baseline at Month 3 of procollagen peptide P1NP, in subjects previously treated with Risedronate or Alendronate
Time Frame: at Month 3
at Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compare changes from baseline for subjects previously treated with Risedronate or Alendronate for: P1NP & other biomarkers including bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, serum CTX, urine NTX
Time Frame: at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, & 12 months of treatment
at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, & 12 months of treatment
Compare changes from baseline for subjects previously treated with Risedronate or Alendronate for: Lumbar spine & hip BMD measured by DXA
Time Frame: after 6 & 12 months of treatment
after 6 & 12 months of treatment
Compare changes from baseline for subjects previously treated with Risedronate or Alendronate for: Bone quality parameters captured by central quantitative computed tomography (QCT)
Time Frame: after 12 months of treatment
after 12 months of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sanofi

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Procter and Gamble

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Suzanne Meeves, PharmD, MBA, Sanofi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 12, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 15, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 11, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 10, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HMR4003B_4034
  • EudraCT # :2004-002317-37

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings