Ziprasidone vs. Sertraline/Haloperidol in Psychotic Depression

August 15, 2014 updated by: Duke University

A Comparison of Two Different Treatments for Major Depression With Psychotic Features: Ziprasidone vs. Combined Sertraline and Haloperidol

The purpose of this study is to compare ziprasidone (Geodon) monotherapy for the treatment of psychotic major depression (PMD)with an antidepressant/antipsychotic combined therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Psychotic depression is a well-established DSM-IV diagnostic subtype indicating the presence of hallucinations and/or delusions as part of the clinical presentation. Currently the treatment of choice for psychotic depression is either electroconvulsive therapy or combination of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. Ziprasidone will be compared to standard of care treatment comprising a combination of an antidepressant, sertraline and an antipsychotic, haloperidol, over a 12-week period. An additional 12-week extension phase is also included for responders to the initial study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
72

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Alexandria University
  • India
      • Bangalore, India, 560029
        • National Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience
  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • University of Southern California

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females, aged 18-70 years
  • If female, must state willingness to use medically accepted methods of birth control (if of reproductive age) and have negative pregnancy test
  • Ability to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent
  • A DSM-IV diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, with psychotic features, based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID)
  • Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (21-item HDRS) greater than or equal to 22

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A current or lifetime DSM-IV diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder
  • A DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence within 3 months of study entry
  • A QTc greater than 460 msec or an abnormal EKG (except minor abnormalities considered by the site investigator to be clinically insignificant)
  • A heart rate less than or equal to 50
  • A personal or family history of QTc
  • Any current or past history of syncope
  • Concurrent treatment with medications associated with prolongation of the QTc
  • Concurrent treatment with medications that may affect magnesium or potassium, such as diuretics
  • Any acute, unstable or serious medical illness (eg, AIDS, history of seizures, history of CVAs).
  • Baseline blood chemistries that are outside local reference ranges and which are felt clinically significant by the site investigator, or a potassium, magnesium or calcium level outside of local reference ranges or liver function tests that are greater than 20% above the upper limit of local reference ranges. If magnesium and/or potassium are below the lower limit of the local laboratory norm, they may be repeated and rechecked during the screening phase, and if within laboratory norms, the subjects may be included.
  • History of unstable cardiovascular disease
  • A significant risk of suicide in the judgement of the site investigator
  • A history of allergy or hypersensitivity to haloperidol, sertraline or ziprasidone
  • Any history of neuroleptic malignant syndrome
  • Treatment with sertraline or ziprasidone within 30 days of study entry
  • History of recent treatment with any long acting psychotropic medications
  • Treatment with a MAO-inhibitor within 14 days of study entry
  • Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days of study entry
  • Current use of carbamazepine, nefazodone, ketoconazole or erythromycin
  • A positive pregnancy test
  • A positive drug screen unless attributable to a prescribed medication (e.g. benzodiazepines)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Ziprasidone
Subjects in this arm received ziprasidone with a placebo to maintain the blind
Drug: Ziprasidone
Target dosage 120-160mg/day based on tolerance
Other Names:
  • Geodon
Active Comparator: Sertraline/Haloperidol
Subjects in this arm received a combination of sertraline and haloperidol with a placebo to maintain the blind. Sertraline dosage was 150-200mg/day and haloperidol was 6-8mg/day based on tolerance.
Drug: Sertraline
Target dosage 150-200mg/day based on tolerance.
Other Names:
  • Zoloft
Drug: Haloperidol
Target dosage 6-8mg/day based on tolerance.
Other Names:
  • Haldol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
21 Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: 12 week
The scale rates 21 symptoms related to major depression. A total score of 0-7 is considered to be normal, scores of 20 or higher indicate moderately severe depression. Total scores range from a minimum of 0(not ill) to a maximum of 64 (severely ill).
12 week
Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A 7 point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. and rated as: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. Overall the scale goes from a minimum of 1(very much improved) to a maximum of 7(very much worse).
12 weeks
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale at 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A rating scale used to measure psychiatric symptoms such as depression, anxiety, hallucinations and unusual behaviour. Each symptom is rated 1-7 and in this version a total of 24 symptoms are scored. Thus the total range of scores is from a minimum of 24 to a maximum of 168. Lower scores are considered better, so the minimum total score of 24 indicates someone with no psychiatric symptoms, while any score over 40 is considered at least moderately severe, with only the most severely ill patients scoring over 60.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Pfizer
National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, India

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Frederick Cassidy, MD, Duke University
  • Principal Investigator: George Simpson, MD, University of Southern California
  • Principal Investigator: Ranga Krishnan, MD, Duke University
  • Principal Investigator: Sumant Khanna, MD, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience
  • Principal Investigator: Adel Elsheshai, MD, Alexandria University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 20, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 21, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 19, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 15, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00008437
  • 3846-05-6R2 (Other Identifier: Duke legacy protocol number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings