A Study of Flovent in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

September 24, 2020 updated by: Marc Rothenberg, MD

A Double Blinded, Randomized Trial of Swallowed 1760mcg Fluticasone Propionate Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The purpose of this study is to test the effects (both good and bad) of high dose swallowed fluticasone propionate (Flovent) in subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • The Children's Hospital of Denver
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 30 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent for study by subject, or parent/guardian if subject is a minor. Assent will be obtained from all minors 11 years of age and older.
  • Histological findings on esophageal biopsy to include peak eosinophil density ≥ 24 per high power field (400x) in the proximal or distal esophagus validated by a pathologist at CCHMC.
  • Allergy evaluation including skin-prick testing with multiple food antigens to ensure elimination diet is not indicated.
  • Have undergone a minimum 3 months of elimination diet as indicated by skin-prick testing without detectable resolution by repeat endoscopy with biopsies demonstrating persistent EE OR subject/parental refusal to follow elimination diet. If the subject/parent refuses the elimination diet, they are eligible for this study.
  • Treatment with a proton-pump inhibitor for at least two months (rounded to nearest month) prior to endoscopy OR failure of histological improvement as defined by < 1 eosinophil per HPF after 2 month (rounded to nearest month) trial of proton pump inhibitor documented by prior endoscopy. The PPI must be used prior to endoscopy to rule out the possibility of GERD.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of poor tolerance to Fluticasone Propionate (FP), as defined as multiple episodes of oral candidiasis, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression as evidenced by signs of Cushing syndrome, headaches, or increased respiratory infections during exposure to Flovent
  • Unable to cooperate with use of MDI
  • Pregnant females
  • Concurrent or recent (within 3 months) use of systemic corticosteroids.
  • Unable to swallow medicines (i.e., fed only by gastrostomy tube).
  • Comorbid eosinophilic disorders.
  • Previously treated with swallowed glucocorticoid for EE within 3 months of the screening visit. Nasal glucocorticoids taken for EE are permitted.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Flovent 1760 mcg
Fluticasone propionate 880 mcg twice daily for 3 months
Drug: Flovent
1760 mcg daily
Other Names:
  • Fluticasone propionate
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo twice daily for 3 months
Other: Placebo
Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Attained Remission.
Time Frame: 3 months
Remission is considered achieved when the highest eosinophil count per high power field (hpf) in all esophageal biopsies is </= 1 eosinophil/hpf after 3 months of therapy.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Participants With Decreased Cortisol Levels After 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
Blood and saliva cortisol was measured and compared to reference range at 3 months. Participants with measures below the reference range were considered "decreased".
3 months
Association of Subject Age, Body Mass Index Z-score, and Allergic Status to Response to Flovent
Time Frame: 3 months
Strength of the association (odds ratio) of age, body mass index (BMI) z-score , and allergic status with response to Flovent. Allergic status is defined as a history of allergic disease (allergic rhinitis, hay fever, atopic dermatitis, eczema, food anaphylaxis, asthma, or positive skin prick tests). Response is defined as <= 1 eosinophil/high power field in esophageal biopsies.
3 months
EoE Score After 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
The gene expression profile is associated with an EoE score algorithm reflecting disease status and severity in a quantifiable number - called the EoE score, based on a core set of 77 diagnostic genes. The EoE score was calculated for Flovent responders and placebo. Higher scores indicate normalization of genes associated with inflammation and fibrosis (disease severity). Therefore higher scores mean a better outcome. The minimum score is zero. There is no maximum score.
3 months
Association of Compliance With Therapy and Response to Flovent
Time Frame: 3 months
Odds ratio was determined to show the strength of the association between compliance with the drug therapy and response to the drug therapy
3 months
Percent of Participants With Abdominal Pain After Therapy
Time Frame: 3 months
Percent of participants responding that they experienced abdominal pain (i.e. they did not respond "never") after therapy. Responses were dichotomized into "Never" and "sometimes".
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Marc Rothenberg, MD

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marc E. Rothenberg, M.D., Ph.D., Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 22, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 22, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 24, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 24, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 06-10-07

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings