Randomized Prospective Trial for Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer (CTS-179)

August 16, 2012 updated by: Seung Yong Jeong, National Cancer Center, Korea

A Comparison for Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Surgery for Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiation- Randomized Prospective Trial

The investigators designed the randomized prospective trial of comparing open and laparoscopic resection in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation in order to determine the oncologic and functional efficacy of laparoscopic rectal resection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Title: A comparison for laparoscopically assisted and open surgery for advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation - randomized prospective trial
  2. Principal investigator: Jae Hwan Oh Co-investigator: Seung Yong Jeong, Sung Bum Kang, Hyo Seong Choi, Seok-Byung Lim
  3. Purpose of the study: To compare efficacy of laparoscopic and open resection for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation

  4. Specific aims

    1. comparison of oncologic outcomes
    2. comparison of quality of life
    3. comparison of anorectal function
  5. Materials Rectal cancer <9cm from anal verge, measured by rigid sigmoidoscopy histologically proven adenocarcinoma locally advanced (T3), determined by CT, transrectal ultrasonography, MRI without any contraindication for general anesthesia,operation and chemoradiation Completion of preoperative chemoradiation

  6. Statistics

    1. Sample size calculation for non-inferiority trial: 340
    2. Disease free survival: Log-rank test,Cox regression analysis
    3. QOL and anorectal function: Repeated measured ANCOVA

  7. Methods

    1. operation time of operation : 6-8 weeks after end of preoperative chemoradiation surgical technique standard total mesorectal excision and high ligation of inferior mesenteric vessels
    2. preoperative chemoradiation chemotherapy: 2 cycles of 5-FU (400 mg/m2/day) + LV (20 mg/m2/day) IV bolus, for 3 days in 1st & 5th wks of RT or Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 p.o. bid during RT RT:45 Gy/ 25 fractions to the pelvis, 5.4 Gy/ 3 fractions boost to the primary tumor over 5.5 wks
    3. postoperative chemotherapy 4 cycles of 5-FU (400 mg/m2/day) + LV (20 mg/m2/day) IV bolus, for 5 days, 4 wks interval

    4. oncologic outcomes

      1. Short-term outcomes Surgical length of incision op time blood loss intraoperative complications conversion rate Pathological resection margins (proximal, distal, circumferential) number of harvested lymph nodes length of resected bowel tumor regression grade (Dworak's grading) TNM staging Perioperative recovery duration of use of parenteral narcotics initiation of peristalsis initiation of oral intake duration of hospital stay 30-day postoperative mortality morbidity
      2. Long-term outcomes Primary end point Disease free survival (3 years after surgery) Secondary end points Overall survival Local recurrence Distant metastasis Port-site and wound site recurrence
    5. Quality of life Urinary function Duration of urinary catheterization Residual urine volume at discharge International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Male sexual function International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Female sexual function Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) QOL assessment EORTC QLQ C30 EORTC QLQ CR38
    6. Anorectal function Anorectal manometry Maximum Resting Pressure Maximum Squeezing Pressure High Pressure Zone Sphincter Length Sensory Threshold Rectal Capacity Rectal Compliance Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
340

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Gyeonggi
      • Goyang, Gyeonggi, Korea, Republic of, 410-769
        • National Cancer Center, Korea

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mid to low rectal cancer (within 9cm from AV, measured by RS)
  • Histologically proven adenocarcinoma
  • Locally advanced (T3, determined by CT, MRI and TRUS)
  • Completion of preoperative chemoradiation
  • Age: 18-80
  • Hb ≥ 10g/dl, WBC≥ 3,000/mm3, Plt≥ 100,000/mm3
  • Cr ≤ 1.5 mg/dl
  • Adequate cardiopulmonary function
  • Informed consent from patient or patient's relative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metastasis in liver, lung, brain, bone, paraaortic LN, subclavicular LN, inguinal LN
  • Second primary malignancy (except CIS of the cervix or adequately treated skin cancer or prior malignancy treated more than 5 years ago without recurrence)
  • Cardiopulmonary dysfunction
  • Active, uncontrolled infection
  • Active, uncontrolled psychosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: open rectal resection
conventional open resection
Procedure: open rectal resection
open rectal resection
Active Comparator: laparoscopic rectal resection
Procedure: laparoscopic rectal resection
laparoscopic assisted rectal resection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disease free survival
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Anorectal function
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Overall survival
Time Frame: 3 year, 5 year
3 year, 5 year
Quality of life
Time Frame: preop, postop 3mo, posop 1 yr, 3yr, 5yr
preop, postop 3mo, posop 1 yr, 3yr, 5yr

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Immunologic response
Time Frame: preop, postop 2hr, postop 1day, 5day
preop, postop 2hr, postop 1day, 5day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Cancer Center, Korea

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jae Hwan Oh, M.D., ph.D., National Cancer Center, Korea

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 7, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 8, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 17, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 16, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NCCCTS-06-179

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings