Efficacy of Noninvasive Ventilation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

July 2, 2015 updated by: Columbia University

Prevalence and Severity of Nocturnal Oxygenation and Ventilation Failure in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Using Noninvasive Ventilation

This study will test the hypothesis that noninvasive ventilation (NIV) as prescribed in current medical practice for use in amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients fails to deliver adequate breathing support over a night of use in the patient's home. ALS patients who come to the ALS Center for their routine 3 month follow up exam and are currently using NIV will be asked to complete questionnaires regarding their quality of sleep, quality of life and general level of function, and to undergo a home sleep study, using a safe, comfortable and reliable breathing monitoring system during a night of sleep. If the questionnaires or the sleep study show failure of the breathing device, the investigators will work with the patient to fix the problem and then offer a second study to make sure that the changes were helpful. The results of this study may help to develop subsequent studies and to improve the guidelines used for care of ALS patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), also known as "Lou Gehrig's Disease", is a fatal disorder that causes breathing failure due to progressive weakness of the muscles of breathing. Breathing assist devices known as noninvasive ventilation (NIV) are offered to ALS patients when their breathing function worsens. These devices deliver breathing assistance via a mask on the nose or nose and mouth, and are thought to be particularly important to be used during sleep, when breathing often becomes more shallow and irregular. However, although these devices have become the standard of therapy in ALS patients once their lung function worsens, it remains unclear how effective these devices actually are when a patient is sleeping, partly because of the practical difficulties in applying the device properly and keeping it applied throughout the sleep period, and partly because they are most commonly prescribed without objective evidence regarding how much breathing support the patient needs as the disease progresses and the breathing muscles weaken further.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Eleanor and Lou Gehrig ALS/MDA Center at Columbia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with ALS who are using nocturnal noninvasive ventilation to treat respiratory insufficiency will be screened for eligibility as below.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (El Escorial criteria)
  • age 18 to 18 years old
  • using nocturnal noninvasive ventilation to treat respiratory insufficiency at least 4 hours per night, for at least 4 nights per week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to safely use NIPPV because of bulbar dysfunction
  • indications for tracheostomy assisted ventilation due to inability to clear secretions from the airway
  • presence of comorbid conditions with a life expectancy < 6 months
  • presence of advanced dementia
  • unwillingness to follow up at the Eleanor and Lou Gehrig ALS/MDA Center at Columbia University on a regular basis
  • previously diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea
  • residence outside the New York metropolitan area.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tolerance of bilevel PAP
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
The ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) will be administered to measure tolerance.
Up to 3 months
Score on Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Objective evidence of nocturnal sleep-disordered breathing on the bilevel PAP will be measured.
Up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Columbia University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robert Basner, MD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 27, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 1, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AAAC2000

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Motor Neuron Disease

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings